Literature DB >> 25748267

Using patient-reported outcomes in routine practice: three novel use cases and implications.

Helena Hvitfeldt Forsberg1, Eugene C Nelson, Robert Reid, David Grossman, Melanie P Mastanduno, Lisa Torrey Weiss, Elliott S Fisher, James N Weinstein.   

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can show how patients perceive their illness burden over time. Active use of PROs by clinicians at the point of service can help illuminate the patients' longitudinal changes in outcomes, thereby advancing shared decision making, patient engagement, and self-care. This article offers principles and lessons learned from using PROs and provides 3 case studies to demonstrate how to overcome the challenges in using PROs in routine clinical practice to improve outcomes. These cases demonstrate that it is possible to embed patient-generated data into the flow of care and to track outcomes for improvement and research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25748267     DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage        ISSN: 0148-9917


  15 in total

Review 1.  Can the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Improve the Delivery of Person-Centered Diabetes Care? A Review of Recent Developments and a Case Study.

Authors:  Soren E Skovlund; T H Lichtenberg; D Hessler; N Ejskjaer
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Adoption of Patient-Reported Outcomes by Health Systems and Physician Practices in the USA.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Martin J Kyalwazi; Valerie A Lewis; Karl Rubio; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  Quality in practice: implementation of a clinical outcomes registry in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Frank Zackary Jenio; Corey Scholes; Maimuna Marenah; Jinjie Li; Mac Cowley; Milad Ebrahimi; Meredith Harrison-Brown; William D Murrell
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-04

4.  Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data Into Clinical Care Settings or Clinical Decision-Making: Lessons Learned From Project HealthDesign.

Authors:  Deborah J Cohen; Sara R Keller; Gillian R Hayes; David A Dorr; Joan S Ash; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2016-10-19

5.  The Effect of Pet Therapy and Artist Interactions on Quality of Life in Brain Tumor Patients: A Cross-Section of Art and Medicine in Dialog.

Authors:  Stefan Petranek; Jennifer Pencek; Mahua Dey
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-27

6.  Data Management for Applications of Patient Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  E A Bayliss; H A Tabano; T M Gill; K Anzuoni; M Tai-Seale; H G Allore; D A Ganz; S Dublin; A L Gruber-Baldini; A L Adams; K M Mazor
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2018-05-10

7.  The Munich Ankle Questionnaire (MAQ): a self-assessment tool for a comprehensive evaluation of ankle disorders.

Authors:  Frederik Greve; Karl Friedrich Braun; Veronika Vitzthum; Michael Zyskowski; Michael Müller; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Peter Biberthaler; Marc Beirer
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.175

8.  Remote follow-up using patient-reported outcome measures in patients with chronic kidney disease: the PROKID study - study protocol for a non-inferiority pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Birgith Engelst Grove; Per Ivarsen; Annette de Thurah; Liv Marit Schougaard; Derek Kyte; Niels Henrik Hjøllund
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science.

Authors:  Eugene C Nelson; Mary Dixon-Woods; Paul B Batalden; Karen Homa; Aricca D Van Citters; Tamara S Morgan; Elena Eftimovska; Elliott S Fisher; John Ovretveit; Wade Harrison; Cristin Lind; Staffan Lindblad
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-07-01

10.  Converging and diverging needs between patients and providers who are collecting and using patient-generated health data: an integrative review.

Authors:  Meghan J Reading; Jacqueline A Merrill
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.