Literature DB >> 25745109

Mapping and Quantitation of the Interaction between the Recombination Activating Gene Proteins RAG1 and RAG2.

Yu-Hang Zhang1, Keerthi Shetty1, Marius D Surleac2, Andrei J Petrescu2, David G Schatz3.   

Abstract

The RAG endonuclease consists of RAG1, which contains the active site for DNA cleavage, and RAG2, an accessory factor whose interaction with RAG1 is critical for catalytic function. How RAG2 activates RAG1 is not understood. Here, we used biolayer interferometry and pulldown assays to identify regions of RAG1 necessary for interaction with RAG2 and to measure the RAG1-RAG2 binding affinity (KD ∼0.4 μM) (where RAG1 and RAG2 are recombination activating genes 1 or 2). Using the Hermes transposase as a guide, we constructed a 36-kDa "mini" RAG1 capable of interacting robustly with RAG2. Mini-RAG1 consists primarily of the catalytic center and the residues N-terminal to it, but it lacks a zinc finger region in RAG1 previously implicated in binding RAG2. The ability of Mini-RAG1 to interact with RAG2 depends on a predicted α-helix (amino acids 997-1008) near the RAG1 C terminus and a region of RAG1 from amino acids 479 to 559. Two adjacent acidic amino acids in this region (Asp-546 and Glu-547) are important for both the RAG1-RAG2 interaction and recombination activity, with Asp-546 of particular importance. Structural modeling of Mini-RAG1 suggests that Asp-546/Glu-547 lie near the predicted 997-1008 α-helix and components of the active site, raising the possibility that RAG2 binding alters the structure of the RAG1 active site. Quantitative Western blotting allowed us to estimate that mouse thymocytes contain on average ∼1,800 monomers of RAG1 and ∼15,000 molecules of RAG2, implying that nuclear concentrations of RAG1 and RAG2 are below the KD value for their interaction, which could help limit off-target RAG activity.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amino Acid; Biosensor; DNA Cleavage; DNA Recombination; Protein Structure; Protein-Protein Interaction; RAG1; RAG2; V(D)J Recombination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25745109      PMCID: PMC4424321          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.638627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  47 in total

1.  Detection of RAG protein-V(D)J recombination signal interactions near the site of DNA cleavage by UV cross-linking.

Authors:  Q M Eastman; I J Villey; D G Schatz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Complementation of V(D)J recombination deficiency in RAG-1(-/-) B cells reveals a requirement for novel elements in the N-terminus of RAG-1.

Authors:  C A Roman; S R Cherry; D Baltimore
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 3.  The roles of the RAG1 and RAG2 "non-core" regions in V(D)J recombination and lymphocyte development.

Authors:  Jessica M Jones; Carrie Simkus
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Monomer-dimer equilibrium in glutathione transferases: a critical re-examination.

Authors:  Raffaele Fabrini; Anastasia De Luca; Lorenzo Stella; Giampiero Mei; Barbara Orioni; Sarah Ciccone; Giorgio Federici; Mario Lo Bello; Giorgio Ricci
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Definition of a large region of RAG1 that is important for coimmunoprecipitation of RAG2.

Authors:  C J McMahan; M J Sadofsky; D G Schatz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction.

Authors:  Ambrish Roy; Alper Kucukural; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  RAG-2 promotes heptamer occupancy by RAG-1 in the assembly of a V(D)J initiation complex.

Authors:  P C Swanson; S Desiderio
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Protein 8-class secondary structure prediction using conditional neural fields.

Authors:  Zhiyong Wang; Feng Zhao; Jian Peng; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 9.  The origins of the Rag genes--from transposition to V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Sebastian D Fugmann
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 11.130

10.  The V(D)J recombination activating protein RAG2 consists of a six-bladed propeller and a PHD fingerlike domain, as revealed by sequence analysis.

Authors:  I Callebaut; J P Mornon
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.261

View more
  10 in total

1.  Immature Lymphocytes Inhibit Rag1 and Rag2 Transcription and V(D)J Recombination in Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Megan R Fisher; Adrian Rivera-Reyes; Noah B Bloch; David G Schatz; Craig H Bassing
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  VprBP (DCAF1) Regulates RAG1 Expression Independently of Dicer by Mediating RAG1 Degradation.

Authors:  N Max Schabla; Greg A Perry; Victoria L Palmer; Patrick C Swanson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 3.  Riches in RAGs: Revealing the V(D)J Recombinase through High-Resolution Structures.

Authors:  Karla K Rodgers
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Recruitment of RAG1 and RAG2 to Chromatinized DNA during V(D)J Recombination.

Authors:  Keerthi Shetty; David G Schatz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Binding and allosteric transmission of histone H3 Lys-4 trimethylation to the recombinase RAG-1 are separable functions of the RAG-2 plant homeodomain finger.

Authors:  Meiling R May; John T Bettridge; Stephen Desiderio
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Collaboration of RAG2 with RAG1-like proteins during the evolution of V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Lina Marcela Carmona; Sebastian D Fugmann; David G Schatz
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Roles of the C-terminal domains of topoisomerase IIα and topoisomerase IIβ in regulation of the decatenation checkpoint.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kozuki; Kenichi Chikamori; Marius D Surleac; Marius A Micluta; Andrei J Petrescu; Eric J Norris; Paul Elson; Gerald A Hoeltge; Dale R Grabowski; Andrew C G Porter; Ram N Ganapathi; Mahrukh K Ganapathi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  EDEM3 Domains Cooperate to Perform Its Overall Cell Functioning.

Authors:  Georgiana Manica; Simona Ghenea; Cristian V A Munteanu; Eliza C Martin; Cristian Butnaru; Marius Surleac; Gabriela N Chiritoiu; Petruta R Alexandru; Andrei-Jose Petrescu; Stefana M Petrescu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  RAG1 splicing mutation causes enhanced B cell differentiation and autoantibody production.

Authors:  Qing Min; Xin Meng; Qinhua Zhou; Ying Wang; Yaxuan Li; Nannan Lai; Ermeng Xiong; Wenjie Wang; Shoya Yasuda; Meiping Yu; Hai Zhang; Jinqiao Sun; Xiaochuan Wang; Ji-Yang Wang
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-10-08

10.  Rapid generation of novel models of RAG1 deficiency by CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutagenesis in murine zygotes.

Authors:  Lisa Ott de Bruin; Wei Yang; Kelly Capuder; Yu Nee Lee; Maddalena Antolini; Robin Meyers; Martin Gellert; Kiran Musunuru; John Manis; Luigi Notarangelo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.