Literature DB >> 25745089

Radiation dose and prognosis of ultra-low-dose stress-first myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with chest pain using a high-efficiency camera.

Andrew J Einstein1, Lynne L Johnson2, Albert J DeLuca2, Andrew C Kontak2, Daniel W Groves2, Jennifer Stant2, Ted Pozniakoff2, Bin Cheng3, LeRoy E Rabbani2, Sabahat Bokhari2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Although SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) provides valuable information about patients with chest pain, there is growing concern regarding its radiation burden and lengthy duration. New high-efficiency (HE) cameras and stress-first protocols both offer the potential to markedly reduce radiation. No previous study has assessed outcomes and radiation doses of patients undergoing MPI on an HE-SPECT camera using an ultra-low-dose stress-first protocol.
METHODS: One hundred patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who were candidates for stress-first MPI underwent injection of approximately 185 MBq (5 mCi) of (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin at peak stress, followed by supine and prone imaging on an HE-SPECT camera. Same-day rest imaging was performed on patients with any abnormality on imaging after stress. Radiation effective dose was calculated from administered and residual activities. Patients were contacted 3 mo after discharge, and electronic records were accessed to evaluate the need for reevaluation for chest pain, additional imaging, or cardiac events.
RESULTS: Stress-only imaging was performed in 69 patients, for whom radiation effective dose averaged 0.99 mSv and study duration, 117 min. Radiation dose averaged 2.22 mSv over all patients. At 3 mo, 96 patients were free of major adverse cardiac events, repeat hospital chest pain evaluation, and repeat imaging or stress testing. One year after MPI and hospital discharge, all patients were living and without acute coronary syndrome.
CONCLUSION: HE-SPECT stress-only imaging can be performed in more than two thirds of chest pain patients without a high pretest probability of a stress perfusion defect, with excellent prognosis, a radiation dose averaging 1 mSv, and a test duration of less than 2 h.
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SPECT; high-efficiency camera; myocardial perfusion imaging; radiation dose reduction; stress-first; stress-only

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25745089     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.150664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  23 in total

1.  Opportunities for improvement on current nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure in Latin America: Findings from the 65-country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols cross-sectional Study (INCAPS).

Authors:  João V Vitola; Fernando Mut; Erick Alexánderson; Thomas N B Pascual; Mathew Mercuri; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nathan Better; Madan M Rehani; Ravi Kashyap; Maurizio Dondi; Diana Paez; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  SPECT: Workhorse of state of the art nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Ultra-low-dose computed tomography for attenuation correction of cadmium-zinc-telluride single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Marvin Grossmann; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Fabiola A Bechtiger; Michael Messerli; Moritz Schwyzer; Dominik C Benz; Ken Kudura; Catherine Gebhard; Christoph Gräni; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Dose reduction is good but it is image quality that matters.

Authors:  R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Brian G Abbott; James A Case; Sharmila Dorbala; Andrew J Einstein; James R Galt; Robert Pagnanelli; Renée P Bullock-Palmer; Prem Soman; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Using advanced technology to reduce the dose of SPECT MPI radiation.

Authors:  Randall C Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Which SPECT for today, which SPECT for tomorrow?

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  The time is now: Dose reduction for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  W Lane Duvall; Tarun S Tandon; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  A world view of nuclear cardiology practices: Think globally, act locally.

Authors:  Thomas A Holly
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.