Literature DB >> 25742461

Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.

Go Wakabayashi1, Daniel Cherqui, David A Geller, Joseph F Buell, Hironori Kaneko, Ho Seong Han, Horacio Asbun, Nicholas OʼRourke, Minoru Tanabe, Alan J Koffron, Allan Tsung, Olivier Soubrane, Marcel Autran Machado, Brice Gayet, Roberto I Troisi, Patrick Pessaux, Ronald M Van Dam, Olivier Scatton, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Giulio Belli, Choon Hyuck David Kwon, Bjørn Edwin, Gi Hong Choi, Luca Antonio Aldrighetti, Xiujun Cai, Sean Cleary, Kuo-Hsin Chen, Michael R Schön, Atsushi Sugioka, Chung-Ngai Tang, Paulo Herman, Juan Pekolj, Xiao-Ping Chen, Ibrahim Dagher, William Jarnagin, Masakazu Yamamoto, Russell Strong, Palepu Jagannath, Chung-Mau Lo, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Norihiro Kokudo, Jeffrey Barkun, Steven M Strasberg.   

Abstract

The use of laparoscopy for liver surgery is increasing rapidly. The Second International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resections (LLR) was held in Morioka, Japan, from October 4 to 6, 2014 to evaluate the current status of laparoscopic liver surgery and to provide recommendations to aid its future development. Seventeen questions were addressed. The first 7 questions focused on outcomes that reflect the benefits and risks of LLR. These questions were addressed using the Zurich-Danish consensus conference model in which the literature and expert opinion were weighed by a 9-member jury, who evaluated LLR outcomes using GRADE and a list of comparators. The jury also graded LLRs by the Balliol Classification of IDEAL. The jury concluded that MINOR LLRs had become standard practice (IDEAL 3) and that MAJOR liver resections were still innovative procedures in the exploration phase (IDEAL 2b). Continued cautious introduction of MAJOR LLRs was recommended. All of the evidence available for scrutiny was of LOW quality by GRADE, which prompted the recommendation for higher quality evaluative studies. The last 10 questions focused on technical questions and the recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion. Recommendations were made regarding preoperative evaluation, bleeding controls, transection methods, anatomic approaches, and equipment. Both experts and jury recognized the need for a formal structure of education for those interested in performing major laparoscopic LLR because of the steep learning curve.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25742461     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  389 in total

1.  Expanding indications and regional diversity in laparoscopic liver resection unveiled by the International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection (INSTALL) study.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Osamu Itano; Yuko Kitagawa; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Learning curve of self-taught laparoscopic liver surgeons in left lateral sectionectomy: results from an international multi-institutional analysis on 245 cases.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Leonid I Barkhatov; Federico Tomassini; Federica Cipriani; Airazat M Kazaryan; Bjǿrn Edwin; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Roberto I Troisi; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  National trends with a laparoscopic liver resection: results from a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jin He; Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Kenzo Hirose; Martin Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Safety analysis of the oncological outcome after vein-preserving surgery for colorectal liver metastases detached from the main hepatic veins.

Authors:  Federico Tomassini; Italo Bonadio; Peter Smeets; Karen De Paepe; Giammauro Berardi; Liesbeth Ferdinande; Stéphanie Laurent; Louis J Libbrecht; Karen Geboes; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Professor Daniel Cherqui: my experiences with laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Michael D Kluger; Eunice X Xu
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Learning curve in laparoscopic liver surgery: a fellow's perspective.

Authors:  Adrian Kah Heng Chiow; Ser Yee Lee; Chung Yip Chan; Siong San Tan
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 7.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Minimally invasive resection of posterosuperior liver tumors in the supine position using intra-abdominal trocars.

Authors:  Emin Kose; Bora Kahramangil; Husnu Aydin; Mustafa Donmez; Federico Aucejo; Cristiano Quintini; John Fung; Eren Berber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Patricio M Polanco
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2016-03-08

10.  Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Training Course on Thiel-Embalmed Human Cadavers: Program Evaluation, Trainer's Long-Term Feedback and Steps Forward.

Authors:  Nikdokht Rashidian; Wouter Willaert; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Vincenzo Scuderi; Francesca Tozzi; Aude Vanlander; Katharina D'Herde; Adnan Alseidi; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.