Neetha Gandikota1, Sidonie Hartridge-Lambert2, Jocelyn C Migliacci2, Joachim Yahalom3, Carol S Portlock2, Heiko Schöder1. 1. Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the need for surveillance imaging in early-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) after planned combined-modality therapy (CMT). METHODS: Primary early-stage cHL patients who underwent CMT were included. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), CT, or both were performed at the initial staging, during or after chemotherapy, and for at least 2 years during follow-up. Imaging studies and medical records were reviewed to determine if and when relapse had occurred. Radiation doses and costs were also calculated from follow-up imaging. RESULTS: The study included 78 patients with a median follow-up of 46 months; 85% of the patients had stage II disease (32% with bulky disease). Four of 77 interim PET scans were positive; none of these patients relapsed during follow-up, which ranged from 24 to 80 months. After a total of 466 follow-up imaging studies (91% with CT and 9% with PET/CT), no cHL relapse was detected. Eleven abnormal findings were noted on surveillance imaging: 9 were false-positives, and 2 were second primary malignancies. The average cumulative dose per patient from follow-up imaging was 107 mSv, which translated into an estimated lifetime excess cancer risk of 0.5%; the estimated total costs were $296,817 according to Medicare reimbursements. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance imaging with either CT or PET/CT can be omitted safely for early-stage cHL treated with a combination of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine and radiation therapy because the risk of relapse is extremely low. This observation also applies to patients with bulky disease. The elimination of surveillance imaging will also reduce healthcare expenses and cumulative radiation doses in these predominantly young patients.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the need for surveillance imaging in early-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) after planned combined-modality therapy (CMT). METHODS: Primary early-stage cHL patients who underwent CMT were included. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), CT, or both were performed at the initial staging, during or after chemotherapy, and for at least 2 years during follow-up. Imaging studies and medical records were reviewed to determine if and when relapse had occurred. Radiation doses and costs were also calculated from follow-up imaging. RESULTS: The study included 78 patients with a median follow-up of 46 months; 85% of the patients had stage II disease (32% with bulky disease). Four of 77 interim PET scans were positive; none of these patients relapsed during follow-up, which ranged from 24 to 80 months. After a total of 466 follow-up imaging studies (91% with CT and 9% with PET/CT), no cHL relapse was detected. Eleven abnormal findings were noted on surveillance imaging: 9 were false-positives, and 2 were second primary malignancies. The average cumulative dose per patient from follow-up imaging was 107 mSv, which translated into an estimated lifetime excess cancer risk of 0.5%; the estimated total costs were $296,817 according to Medicare reimbursements. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance imaging with either CT or PET/CT can be omitted safely for early-stage cHL treated with a combination of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine and radiation therapy because the risk of relapse is extremely low. This observation also applies to patients with bulky disease. The elimination of surveillance imaging will also reduce healthcare expenses and cumulative radiation doses in these predominantly young patients.
Authors: T A Lister; D Crowther; S B Sutcliffe; E Glatstein; G P Canellos; R C Young; S A Rosenberg; C A Coltman; M Tubiana Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1989-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John M M Raemaekers; Marc P E André; Massimo Federico; Theodore Girinsky; Reman Oumedaly; Ercole Brusamolino; Pauline Brice; Christophe Fermé; Richard van der Maazen; Manuel Gotti; Reda Bouabdallah; Catherine J Sebban; Yolande Lievens; Allessandro Re; Aspasia Stamatoullas; Frank Morschhauser; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Elisabetta Abruzzese; Pierre Olivier; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Gustaaf van Imhoff; Tiana Raveloarivahy; Monica Bellei; Thierry van der Borght; Stephane Bardet; Annibale Versari; Martin Hutchings; Michel Meignan; Catherine Fortpied Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alfred Ian Lee; Dan S Zuckerman; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Suzanne L Aquino; Diane Crowley; Christiana Toomey; Ann S Lacasce; Yang Feng; Donna S Neuberg; Ephraim P Hochberg Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Olav Favier; Natacha Heutte; Aspasia Stamatoullas-Bastard; Patrice Carde; Mars B Van't Veer; Berthe M P Aleman; Evert M Noordijk; José Thomas; Christophe Fermé; Michel Henry-Amar Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Vatsal Patel; Michael Buckstein; Rodolfo Perini; Christine Hill-Kayser; Jakub Svoboda; John P Plastaras Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2013-02-12
Authors: T C El-Galaly; Karen Juul Mylam; Martin Bøgsted; Peter Brown; Maria Rossing; Anne Ortved Gang; Anne Haglund; Bente Arboe; Michael Roost Clausen; Paw Jensen; Michael Pedersen; Anne Bukh; Bo Amdi Jensen; Christian Bjørn Poulsen; Francesco d'Amore; Martin Hutchings Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2014-02-24 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: A Rueda Domínguez; J Alfaro Lizaso; L de la Cruz Merino; J Gumá I Padró; C Quero Blanco; J Gómez Codina; M Llanos Muñoz; N Martinez Banaclocha; D Rodriguez Abreu; M Provencio Pulla Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Ka-Won Kang; Se Ryeon Lee; Dae Sik Kim; Eun Sang Yu; Hwa Jung Sung; Seok Jin Kim; Chul Won Choi; Yong Park; Byung Soo Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 3.240