H Mocikova1, P Obrtlikova, B Vackova, M Trneny. 1. First Department of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic. heidi.mocikova@seznam.cz
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Routine positron emission tomography (PET) in follow-up of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after treatment is still controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the clinical impact of routine PET examination during the follow-up for relapse detection in PET-negative HL patients at the end of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PET scans were carried out in 113 HL patients at the end of therapy and during the follow-up either in regular intervals or in a suspected relapse. Median follow-up of the group was 34 months. RESULTS: Overall 327 PET scans were evaluated in 113 patients (median three PET scans per patient). At the end of therapy, 94 (83.2%) patients were PET negative and 19 (16.8%) PET positive. Regular follow-up PET scans in 67 of 94 PET-negative patients correctly identified tumor in 6 of 155 PET scans (3.9%). In 27 of 94 patients with clinically suspected relapse, 5 of 27 PET scans (18.5%) confirmed tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that there is no need for regular follow-up with PET scans in PET-negative patients at the end of therapy: the ratio of true-positive PET scans during the follow-up is low (3.9%). Positive PET at the end of therapy and during follow-up should be evaluated with caution.
BACKGROUND: Routine positron emission tomography (PET) in follow-up of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after treatment is still controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the clinical impact of routine PET examination during the follow-up for relapse detection in PET-negative HL patients at the end of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PET scans were carried out in 113 HL patients at the end of therapy and during the follow-up either in regular intervals or in a suspected relapse. Median follow-up of the group was 34 months. RESULTS: Overall 327 PET scans were evaluated in 113 patients (median three PET scans per patient). At the end of therapy, 94 (83.2%) patients were PET negative and 19 (16.8%) PET positive. Regular follow-up PET scans in 67 of 94 PET-negative patients correctly identified tumor in 6 of 155 PET scans (3.9%). In 27 of 94 patients with clinically suspected relapse, 5 of 27 PET scans (18.5%) confirmed tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that there is no need for regular follow-up with PET scans in PET-negative patients at the end of therapy: the ratio of true-positive PET scans during the follow-up is low (3.9%). Positive PET at the end of therapy and during follow-up should be evaluated with caution.
Authors: Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly; Karen Juul Mylam; Peter Brown; Lena Specht; Ilse Christiansen; Lars Munksgaard; Hans Erik Johnsen; Annika Loft; Anne Bukh; Victor Iyer; Anne Lerberg Nielsen; Martin Hutchings Journal: Haematologica Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Richard T Hoppe; Ranjana H Advani; Weiyun Z Ai; Richard F Ambinder; Patricia Aoun; Celeste M Bello; Cecil M Benitez; Philip J Bierman; Kristie A Blum; Robert Chen; Bouthaina Dabaja; Andres Forero; Leo I Gordon; Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Ephraim P Hochberg; Jiayi Huang; Patrick B Johnston; Nadia Khan; David G Maloney; Peter M Mauch; Monika Metzger; Joseph O Moore; David Morgan; Craig H Moskowitz; Carolyn Mulroney; Matthew Poppe; Rachel Rabinovitch; Stuart Seropian; Christina Tsien; Jane N Winter; Joachim Yahalom; Jennifer L Burns; Hema Sundar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Neetha Gandikota; Sidonie Hartridge-Lambert; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Joachim Yahalom; Carol S Portlock; Heiko Schöder Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 6.860