Literature DB >> 20564135

Surveillance imaging of Hodgkin lymphoma patients in first remission: a clinical and economic analysis.

Alfred Ian Lee1, Dan S Zuckerman, Annick D Van den Abbeele, Suzanne L Aquino, Diane Crowley, Christiana Toomey, Ann S Lacasce, Yang Feng, Donna S Neuberg, Ephraim P Hochberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) achieve disease remission after primary therapy. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no consensus exists for postremission surveillance imaging.
METHODS: Retrospectively analyzed were 192 adult patients with classic HL in first remission. Events were defined as recurrent HL or secondary malignancies. Primary outcome was positive predictive value (PPV) of surveillance positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT scans in event detection. Secondary outcomes were costs and radiation exposures of surveillance scans.
RESULTS: Sixteen events (12 recurrent HL cases and 4 secondary malignancies) were detected during a median follow-up of 31 months. The PPV of surveillance PET/CT was 22.9% compared with 28.6% for CT (P=.73). Factors that were found to significantly improve the PPV of scans in detecting recurrent HL included PET and CT concordance, involvement of a prior disease site, or the occurrence of a radiographic abnormality within 12 months. There were too few events to determine whether event detection by PET/CT versus CT or the presence of symptoms at the time of event detection affected overall outcomes. The cost to detect a single event was approximately $100,000. Radiation exposure to detect a single event was 146.6 millisieverts per patient for each of 9 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with HL in first disease remission, surveillance radiography appears to be expensive, with limited clinical impact. Surveillance CT is generally adequate. Copyright (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20564135     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  23 in total

1.  Role of [18F]-FDG-PET/MDCT in evaluating early response in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  A Orlacchio; O Schillaci; E Gaspari; F Della Gatta; R Danieli; F Bolacchi; C Ragano Caracciolo; A Mancini; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography surveillance in patients with lymphoma: a fox hunt?

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Lale Kostakoglu
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Is routine pelvic surveillance imaging necessary in patients with Wilms tumor?

Authors:  Sue C Kaste; Samuel L Brady; Brian Yee; Valerie J McPherson; Robert A Kaufman; Catherine A Billups; Najat C Daw; Alberto S Pappo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Appropriate surveillance for late complications in patients in remission from Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Deborah L Darrington; Julie M Vose
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  Baseline and ongoing PET-derived factors predict detrimental effect or potential utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT) performed for surveillance in asymptomatic lymphoma patients in first remission.

Authors:  Silvia Morbelli; Selene Capitanio; Fabrizio De Carli; Francesca Bongioanni; Enrico De Astis; Maurizio Miglino; Maria Teresa Verardi; Ambra Buschiazzo; Francesco Fiz; Cecilia Marini; Elena Pomposelli; Gianmario Sambuceti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Surveillance Scans in Lymphoma: Friend or Foe?

Authors:  Tycel Phillips; Jessica Mercer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-02

8.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography surveillance in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma in first remission has a low positive predictive value and high costs.

Authors:  Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly; Karen Juul Mylam; Peter Brown; Lena Specht; Ilse Christiansen; Lars Munksgaard; Hans Erik Johnsen; Annika Loft; Anne Bukh; Victor Iyer; Anne Lerberg Nielsen; Martin Hutchings
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Searching for Evidence-Based Reassurance Where None Could Be Found.

Authors:  Rozalina G McCoy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The lack of evidence for PET or PET/CT surveillance of patients with treated lymphoma, colorectal cancer, and head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kamal Patel; Nira Hadar; Jounghee Lee; Barry A Siegel; Bruce E Hillner; Joseph Lau
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.