| Literature DB >> 25737808 |
Philip M Ashton1, Neil Perry1, Richard Ellis2, Liljana Petrovska2, John Wain3, Kathie A Grant1, Claire Jenkins1, Tim J Dallman1.
Abstract
The ability of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) to cause severe illness in humans is determined by multiple host factors and bacterial characteristics, including Shiga toxin (Stx) subtype. Given the link between Stx2a subtype and disease severity, we sought to identify the stx subtypes present in whole genome sequences (WGS) of 444 isolates of STEC O157. Difficulties in assembling the stx genes in some strains were overcome by using two complementary bioinformatics methods: mapping and de novo assembly. We compared the WGS analysis with the results obtained using a PCR approach and investigated the diversity within and between the subtypes. All strains of STEC O157 in this study had stx1a, stx2a or stx2c or a combination of these three genes. There was over 99% (442/444) concordance between PCR and WGS. When common source strains were excluded, 236/349 strains of STEC O157 had multiple copies of different Stx subtypes and 54 had multiple copies of the same Stx subtype. Of those strains harbouring multiple copies of the same Stx subtype, 33 had variants between the alleles while 21 had identical copies. Strains harbouring Stx2a only were most commonly found to have multiple alleles of the same subtype (42%). Both the PCR and WGS approach to stx subtyping provided a good level of sensitivity and specificity. In addition, the WGS data also showed there were a significant proportion of strains harbouring multiple alleles of the same Stx subtype associated with clinical disease in England.Entities:
Keywords: E. coli; Genomics; O157; Sequencing; Stx
Year: 2015 PMID: 25737808 PMCID: PMC4338798 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Comparison of stx2 subtyping of 444 strains by sequencing and PCR.
Strains that had discrepant results between sequencing and PCR were subjected to a ‘second pass’ PCR.
| Subtype | Sequencing | Subtyping PCR | Subtyping PCR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2a | 82 | 89 | 82 |
| 2c | 194 | 196 | 196 |
| 2a/2c | 167 | 155 | 166 |
| No result | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Total | 444 | 444 | 444 |
Frequency of stx subtype profiles including stx1, derived from WGS analysis, not including outbreak strains.
When a multi subtype result has a ‘?,’ it indicates that the only evidence suggesting the presence of multiple copies was the relative coverage (as opposed to having mixed positions as well).
| Frequency | |
|---|---|
| 1a/2a | 9 |
| 1a/2a/2c | 3 |
| 1a/2c | 64 |
| 1a/multi-stx2c? | 10 |
| 2a | 30 |
| 2a/2c | 136 |
| 2c | 51 |
| multi-1a?/2c | 9 |
| multi-1a/2c | 3 |
| multi-stx2a | 31 |
| multi-stx2c?/multi-1a? | 2 |
| No stx detected | 1 |
Figure 1Coverage of stx1a, normalised by whole genome coverage.
Histogram of coverage of stx1a normalised by whole genome coverage.
Figure 2Coverage of stx2a, normalised by whole genome coverage.
Histogram of coverage of stx2a normalised by whole genome coverage.
Figure 3Coverage of stx2c, normalised by whole genome coverage.
Histogram of coverage of stx2c normalised by whole genome coverage.
Figure 4Minimum spanning tree of stx1a.
Red, previously identified and observed in this study; purple, previously identified but not observed in this study; light blue, novel allele.
Figure 5Minimum spanning tree of stx2a.
Colour as in Fig. 4.
Figure 6Minimum spanning tree of stx2c.
Colour as in Fig. 4.