| Literature DB >> 25737598 |
B Slippers1, J Roux2, M J Wingfield1, F J J van der Walt2, F Jami2, J W M Mehl2, G J Marais3.
Abstract
Identification of fungi and the International Code of Nomenclature underpinning this process, rests strongly on the characterisation of morphological structures. Yet, the value of these characters to define species in many groups has become questionable or even superfluous. This has emerged as DNA-based techniques have increasingly revealed cryptic species and species complexes. This problem is vividly illustrated in the present study where 105 isolates of the Botryosphaeriales were recovered from both healthy and diseased woody tissues of native Acacia spp. in Namibia and South Africa. Thirteen phylogenetically distinct groups were identified based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) rDNA PCR-RFLP and translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF1-α) sequence data, two loci that are known to be reliable markers to distinguish species in the Botryosphaeriales. Four of these groups could be linked reliably to sequence data for formerly described species, including Botryosphaeria dothidea, Dothiorella dulcispinae, Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae and Spencermartinsia viticola. Nine groups, however, could not be linked to any other species known from culture and for which sequence data are available. These groups are, therefore, described as Aplosporella africana, A. papillata, Botryosphaeria auasmontanum, Dothiorella capri-amissi, Do. oblonga, Lasiodiplodia pyriformis, Spencermartinsia rosulata, Sphaeropsis variabilis and an undescribed Neofusicoccum sp. The species described here could not be reliably compared with the thousands of taxa described in these genera from other hosts and regions, where only morphological data are available. Such comparison would be possible only if all previously described taxa are epitypified, which is not a viable objective for the two families, Botryosphaeriaceae and Aplosporellaceae, in the Botryosphaeriales identified here. The extent of diversity of the Botryosphaeriales revealed in this and other recent studies is expected to reflect that of other undersampled regions and hosts, and illustrates the urgency to find more effective ways to describe species in this, and indeed other, groups of fungi.Entities:
Keywords: Botryosphaeriales; morphotaxa; phylogeny; taxonomy; tree health
Year: 2014 PMID: 25737598 PMCID: PMC4312931 DOI: 10.3767/003158514X684780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Persoonia ISSN: 0031-5850 Impact factor: 11.051
Isolates of the Botryosphaeriales from this study, as well as previously identified reference isolates linked to some of them, that were used for phylogenetic and/or taxonomic studies.
| Identity | Culture no. | Host | Locality | Collectors | GenBank accession numbers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | TEF1-α | |||||
| Dordabis, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101315 | EU101360 | |||
| Grootfontein, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101316 | EU101361 | |||
| Dordabis, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101317 | EU101362 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101328 | EU101373 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101329 | EU101374 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101330 | EU101375 | |||
| Windhoek, Namibia | F.J.J van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101303 | EU101348 | |||
| CMW 8000 | Crocifisso, Switzerland | B. Slippers | AY236949 | AY236898 | ||
| Dordabis, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101304 | EU101349 | |||
| Windhoek, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101305 | EU101350 | |||
| CMW 25404, CBS 121878 | Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101324 | EU101369 | ||
| CMW 25405 | Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101325 | EU101370 | ||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101323 | EU101368 | |||
| CBS 130413 | Pretoria, South Africa | F. Jami & M. Gryzenhout | JQ239400 | JQ239387 | ||
| CBS 130414 | Pretoria, South Africa | F. Jami & M. Gryzenhout | JQ239401 | JQ239388 | ||
| CBS 130415 | Pretoria, South Africa | F. Jami & M. Gryzenhout | JQ239402 | JQ239389 | ||
| Rundu, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101299 | EU101344 | |||
| Pretoria, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & R.N. Heath | EU101300 | EU101345 | |||
| Pretoria, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & R.N. Heath | EU101301 | EU101346 | |||
| Rundu, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101310 | EU101355 | |||
| Rundu, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101311 | EU101356 | |||
| Dordabis, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101307 | EU101352 | |||
| Dordabis, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101308 | EU101353 | |||
| Windhoek, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101302 | EU101347 | |||
| Windhoek, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101290 | EU101335 | |||
| Pretoria, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & R.N. Heath | EU101293 | EU101338 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101318 | EU101363 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101319 | EU101364 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101320 | EU101365 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101321 | EU101366 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101322 | EU101367 | |||
| CBS 117009 | Vimbodí, Spain | J. Luque & R. Mateu | AY905554 | AY905559 | ||
| Pretoria, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & R.N. Heath | EU101295 | EU101340 | |||
| Pretoria, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & R.N. Heath | EU101296 | EU101341 | |||
| CBS 117008 | Sant Sadurní d’Anoia, Spain | J. Luque & J. Reyes | AY905557 | AY905560 | ||
| Windhoek, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101313 | EU101358 | |||
| Windhoek, Namibia | F.J.J. van der Walt & J. Roux | EU101314 | EU101359 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101326 | EU101371 | |||
| Northern Cape, South Africa | F.J.J. van der Walt & G.J. Marais | EU101327 | EU101372 | |||
| MUCC 684 | Western Australia, Yalgorup | R. Adair & T. Burgess | EU675682 | EU686573 | ||
| MUCC 685 | Western Australia, Yalgorup | R. Adair & T. Burgess | EU675681 | EU686572 | ||
1 Names in bold signify ex-type cultures, or from samples that have been linked morphologically to the type material.
2 CBS: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CMW: CMW- FABI, University of Pretoria, South Africa; MUCC: Culture Collection, Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Mie University, Tsu, Mie prefecture, Japan.
3 Isolates for which sequences were determined in this study are indicated in bold.
Fig. 1Maximum Likelihood tree of the combined dataset of ITS rDNA and TEF-1α loci sequences. Bootstrap values for ML and MP (italics) above 70 % are given at the nodes. Where both values were 100 %, the values are not shown but the branch is bolded. Isolates sequenced in this study are shown in bold. The species identified in the study are numbered 1–13, with these numbers bolded for species described in this study. The tree was rooted to Guignardia sp. (MUCC 684 and MUCC 685). Botryosphaeriaceae are shaded in blue and Aplosporellaceae in green.
Polymorphic nucleotides from sequence data of the ITS and TEF1-α to show the relationship between Spencermartinsia viticola and S. rosulata. Polymorphisms unique to S. rosulata are in bold type and shaded. Isolates from this study are indicated in bold.
| Identity | Culture no. | ITS | EF1-α | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 85 | 49 | 72 | 203 | 204 | 245 | ||
| C | T | C | C | C | A | G | ||
| C | T | C | C | C | A | G | ||
| CBS 117006 | C | T | C | C | C | A | G | |
| CBS 117009 | C | T | C | C | C | A | G | |
| CBS 117008 | C | T | C | C | C | A | G | |
Sequence differences of the ITS and EF1-α gene regions to show the relationship between Botryosphaeria dothidea and B. auasmontanum. Differences unique to B. auasmontanum are in bold type and shaded. Isolates from this study are indicated in bold.
| Identity | Culture no. | ITS | EF1-α | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56 | 57 | 91–106 | 110 | 133–135 | 214–230 | 236–239 | ||
| CMW 8000 | – | – | GCCGCGGTTCTCCGCG | C | GGG | CTCCGCATCTGGATTTT | TTGT | |
| CBS 116742 | – | – | GCCGCGGTTCTCCGCG | C | GGG | CTCCGCATCTGGATTTT | TTGT | |
| CBS 116743 | – | – | GCCGCGGTTCTCCGCG | C | GGG | CTCCGCATCTGGATTTT | TTGT | |
Polymorphic nucleotides (or alleles) from sequence data of the ITS and TEF1-α to show the relationship between Lasiodiplodia crassispora and the sibling species L. pyriformis. Polymorphisms unique to L. pyriformis are in bold type and shaded. Isolates from this study are indicated in bold.
| Identity | Culture no. | ITS | EF1-α |
|---|---|---|---|
| 466 | 555 | ||
| CMW13488 | T | G | |
| WAC12533 | T | G | |
| WAC12534 | T | G |
Fig. 2Maximum Likelihood tree of the combined dataset of ITS rDNA, TEF-1α and β-tubulin loci sequences for species closely related to Sphaeropsis variabilis. Bootstrap values for ML and MP (italics) above 70 % are given at the nodes. Where both values were 100 %, the values are not shown but the branch is bolded. Isolates sequenced in this study are shown in bold. The tree was rooted to Lasiodiplodia theobromae (CMW 9074 and CBS 16496).
Fig. 3The distribution and numbers of isolates of Botryosphaeriales identified during this study from Acacia spp. in Namibia and South Africa.
Fig. 4Conidia of newly described species of Botryosphaeriales, as well as species with newly described forms; a. Aplosporella africana; b. A. papillata; c. Dichomera state of Botryosphaeria dothidea; d. Dothiorella oblonga; e. B. auasmontanum; f. Lasiodiplodia pyriformis. — Scale bar = 10 μm.
Fig. 5Conidia of newly described species of the Botryosphaeriaceae. a. Neofusicoccum sp.; b. Sphaeropsis variabilis; c. Dothiorella capria-missi; d. S. rosulata. — Scale bar = 10 μm.