M Garnier1, C Quesnel2, J-P Fulgencio3, M Degrain4, G Carteaux5, F Bonnet2, T Similowski6, A Demoule7. 1. Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Hôpital Tenon Faculté de Médecine Pierre & Marie Curie marcgarnier@gmail.com. 2. Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Hôpital Tenon Faculté de Médecine Pierre & Marie Curie. 3. Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Hôpital Tenon. 4. Agence Générale des Equipements et Produits de Santé, APHP, Paris, France. 5. Medical Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Albert Chenevier-Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France. 6. Medical Intensive Care Unit and Respiratory Division, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière Faculté de Médecine Pierre & Marie Curie ER10. 7. Medical Intensive Care Unit and Respiratory Division, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière Faculté de Médecine Pierre & Marie Curie INSERM U974, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Independent bench studies using specific ventilation scenarios allow testing of the performance of ventilators in conditions similar to clinical settings. The aims of this study were to determine the accuracy of the latest generation ventilators to deliver chosen parameters in various typical conditions and to provide clinicians with a comprehensive report on their performance. METHODS: Thirteen modern intensive care unit ventilators were evaluated on the ASL5000 test lung with and without leakage for: (i) accuracy to deliver exact tidal volume (VT) and PEEP in assist-control ventilation (ACV); (ii) performance of trigger and pressurization in pressure support ventilation (PSV); and (iii) quality of non-invasive ventilation algorithms. RESULTS: In ACV, only six ventilators delivered an accurate VT and nine an accurate PEEP. Eleven devices failed to compensate VT and four the PEEP in leakage conditions. Inspiratory delays differed significantly among ventilators in invasive PSV (range 75-149 ms, P=0.03) and non-invasive PSV (range 78-165 ms, P<0.001). The percentage of the ideal curve (concomitantly evaluating the pressurization speed and the levels of pressure reached) also differed significantly (range 57-86% for invasive PSV, P=0.04; and 60-90% for non-invasive PSV, P<0.001). Non-invasive ventilation algorithms efficiently prevented the decrease in pressurization capacities and PEEP levels induced by leaks in, respectively, 10 and 12 out of the 13 ventilators. CONCLUSIONS: We observed real heterogeneity of performance amongst the latest generation of intensive care unit ventilators. Although non-invasive ventilation algorithms appear to maintain adequate pressurization efficiently in the case of leakage, basic functions, such as delivered VT in ACV and pressurization in PSV, are often less reliable than the values displayed by the device suggest.
BACKGROUND: Independent bench studies using specific ventilation scenarios allow testing of the performance of ventilators in conditions similar to clinical settings. The aims of this study were to determine the accuracy of the latest generation ventilators to deliver chosen parameters in various typical conditions and to provide clinicians with a comprehensive report on their performance. METHODS: Thirteen modern intensive care unit ventilators were evaluated on the ASL5000 test lung with and without leakage for: (i) accuracy to deliver exact tidal volume (VT) and PEEP in assist-control ventilation (ACV); (ii) performance of trigger and pressurization in pressure support ventilation (PSV); and (iii) quality of non-invasive ventilation algorithms. RESULTS: In ACV, only six ventilators delivered an accurate VT and nine an accurate PEEP. Eleven devices failed to compensate VT and four the PEEP in leakage conditions. Inspiratory delays differed significantly among ventilators in invasive PSV (range 75-149 ms, P=0.03) and non-invasive PSV (range 78-165 ms, P<0.001). The percentage of the ideal curve (concomitantly evaluating the pressurization speed and the levels of pressure reached) also differed significantly (range 57-86% for invasive PSV, P=0.04; and 60-90% for non-invasive PSV, P<0.001). Non-invasive ventilation algorithms efficiently prevented the decrease in pressurization capacities and PEEP levels induced by leaks in, respectively, 10 and 12 out of the 13 ventilators. CONCLUSIONS: We observed real heterogeneity of performance amongst the latest generation of intensive care unit ventilators. Although non-invasive ventilation algorithms appear to maintain adequate pressurization efficiently in the case of leakage, basic functions, such as delivered VT in ACV and pressurization in PSV, are often less reliable than the values displayed by the device suggest.
Authors: Nicolas Dufour; Fouad Fadel; Bruno Gelée; Jean-Louis Dubost; Sophie Ardiot; Pascal Di Donato; Jean-Damien Ricard Journal: Int Med Case Rep J Date: 2020-10-15