Literature DB >> 25733553

Health literacy and informed decision making regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Iris van der Heide1, Ellen Uiters2, A Jantine Schuit3, Jany Rademakers4, Mirjam Fransen5.   

Abstract

Making an informed decision about participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening may be challenging for invitees with lower health literacy skills. The aim of this systematic review is to explore to what extent the level of a person's health literacy is related to their informed decision making concerning CRC screening. We searched for peer-reviewed studies published between 1950 and May 2013 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciSearch and PsycINFO. Studies were included when health literacy was studied in relation to concepts underpinning informed decision making (awareness, risk perception, perceived barriers and benefits, knowledge, attitude, deliberation). The quality of the studies was determined and related to the study results. The search returned 2254 papers. Eight studies in total were included, among which seven focused on knowledge, four focused on attitudes or beliefs concerning CRC screening, and one focused on risk perception. The studies found either no association or a positive association between health literacy and concepts underpinning informed decision making. Some studies showed that higher health literacy was associated with more CRC screening knowledge and a more positive attitude toward CRC screening. The results of studies that obtained a lower quality score were no different than studies that obtained a higher quality score. In order to obtain more insight into the association between health literacy and informed decision making in CRC cancer screening, future research should study the multiple aspects of informed decision making in conjunction instead of single aspects.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733553     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  16 in total

1.  Decisional balance and self-efficacy mediate the association among provider advice, health literacy and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Qian-Li Xue; Benita Walton-Moss; Marie T Nolan; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.398

2.  Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ashley J Housten; Geetanjali R Kamath; Therese B Bevers; Scott B Cantor; Nickell Dixon; Andre Hite; Michael A Kallen; Viola B Leal; Liang Li; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  A lack of information engagement among colorectal cancer screening non-attenders: cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Lindsay C Kobayashi; Jo Waller; Christian von Wagner; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Health literacy in pregnant women facing prenatal screening may explain their intention to use a patient decision aid: a short report.

Authors:  Agathe Delanoë; Johanie Lépine; Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero; Hubert Robitaille; Stéphane Turcotte; Isabelle Lévesque; Brenda J Wilson; Anik M C Giguère; France Légaré
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-07-11

5.  Role of Psychosocial Factors and Health Literacy in Pregnant Women's Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: A Theory-Based Web Survey.

Authors:  Agathe Delanoë; Johanie Lépine; Stéphane Turcotte; Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero; Hubert Robitaille; Anik Mc Giguère; Brenda J Wilson; Holly O Witteman; Isabelle Lévesque; Laurence Guillaumie; France Légaré
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?

Authors:  Linda N Douma; Ellen Uiters; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Ethnic minority women prefer strong recommendations to be screened for cancer.

Authors:  Laura A V Marlow; Susanne F Meisel; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Videos improve patient understanding of chemotherapy terminology in a rural setting.

Authors:  Hannah Claire Sibold; Mary Catherine Thomson; Rachel Hianik; Eli R Abernethy; Gavin P Campbell; Bradley Sumrall; Melissa Dillmon; Josh Simmons; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Margie D Dixon; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy.

Authors:  M L Essink-Bot; E Dekker; D R M Timmermans; E Uiters; M P Fransen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Health literacy skills for informed decision making in colorectal cancer screening: Perceptions of screening invitees and experts.

Authors:  Anke J Woudstra; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Ellen Uiters; Evelien Dekker; Ellen M A Smets; Mirjam P Fransen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.