Literature DB >> 31795820

Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.

Ashley J Housten1, Geetanjali R Kamath1, Therese B Bevers2, Scott B Cantor1, Nickell Dixon3, Andre Hite4, Michael A Kallen5, Viola B Leal1, Liang Li6, Robert J Volk1.   

Abstract

Introduction. Enhanced visual effects, like animation, have the potential to improve comprehension of probabilistic risk information, particularly for those with lower health literacy. We tested the effect of presentation format on comprehension of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening probabilities to identify optimal risk communication strategies. Methods. Participants from a community foodbank and a cancer prevention center were randomized to 1 of 3 CRC screening risk presentations. The presentations used identical content but varied in format: 1) video with animated pictographs, 2) video with static pictographs, and 3) audiobooklet with static pictographs. Participants completed pre- and postpresentation surveys. The primary outcome was knowledge of probability/risk information regarding CRC screening, calculated as total, verbatim, and gist scores. Results. In total, 187 participants completed the study and were included in this analysis. Median age was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 14 years), most participants were women (63%), and almost half had a high school education or less (46%). Approximately one-quarter had inadequate health literacy (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults marginal/inadequate: 28%; Brief Health Literacy Screener low: 18%), and about half had low numeracy (Subjective Numeracy Scale low: 54%; Graphical Literacy Measure low: 50%). We found no significant differences in total, verbatim, or gist knowledge across presentation formats (all P > 0.05). Discussion. Use of an animated pictograph to communicate risk does not appear to augment or impede knowledge of risk information. Regardless of health literacy level, difficulty understanding pictographs presenting numerical information persists. There may be a benefit to teaching or priming individuals on how to interpret numerical information presented in pictographs before communicating risk using visual methods. Trial Registry: NCT02151032.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; health literacy; shared decision making (SDM)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31795820      PMCID: PMC7286076          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19890296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  39 in total

1.  Effect of various risk/benefit trade-offs on parents' understanding of a pediatric research study.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Terri Voepel-Lewis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Graph literacy: a cross-cultural comparison.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010-07

4.  Representing randomness in the communication of individualized cancer risk estimates: effects on cancer risk perceptions, worry, and subjective uncertainty about risk.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; William M P Klein; Bill Killam; Tom Lehman; Holly Massett; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-03-05

5.  The influence of graphic format on breast cancer risk communication.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Ann B Nattinger; Timothy L McAuliffe
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006-09

6.  Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.

Authors:  Lisa D Chew; Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joseph P Grill; Annamay Snyder; Katharine A Bradley; Sean M Nugent; Alisha D Baines; Michelle Vanryn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel; Aleksandra Jankovic; Holly A Derry; Dylan M Smith
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Todd R Roberts; Holly A Derry; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-03

9.  Acceptability and preliminary feasibility of an internet/CD-ROM-based education and decision program for early-stage prostate cancer patients: randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Michael A Diefenbach; Nihal E Mohamed; Brian P Butz; Natan Bar-Chama; Richard Stock; Jamie Cesaretti; Waleed Hassan; David Samadi; Simon J Hall
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.

Authors:  Lyndal J Trevena; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Adrian Edwards; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Mirta Galesic; Paul K J Han; John King; Margaret L Lawson; Suzanne K Linder; Isaac Lipkus; Elissa Ozanne; Ellen Peters; Danielle Timmermans; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of a Genomic Test on Treatment Decision in a Predominantly African American Population With Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Adam B Murphy; Michael R Abern; Li Liu; Heidy Wang; Courtney M P Hollowell; Roohollah Sharifi; Patricia Vidal; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Marin Sekosan; Karen Ferrer; Shoujin Wu; Marlene Gallegos; Patrice King-Lee; Lisa K Sharp; Carol E Ferrans; Peter H Gann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Getting Rid of Patient's Misconceptions About the Radiology Department Using Animated Video in the Waiting Room.

Authors:  Michel Lavaerts; Hilde Vandenhout; Raymond Oyen; Chantal Van Ongeval
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.894

3.  Testing the Effectiveness of an Animated Decision Aid to Improve Recruitment of Control Participants in a Case-Control Study: Web-Based Experiment.

Authors:  Sandro T Stoffel; Jing Hui Law; Robert Kerrison; Hannah R Brewer; James M Flanagan; Yasemin Hirst
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 7.076

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.