Literature DB >> 25732491

Reference-based benefit design changes consumers' choices and employers' payments for ambulatory surgery.

James C Robinson1, Timothy Brown2, Christopher Whaley3.   

Abstract

Some employers are using reference-based benefit (RBB) designs, also known as "reference-based pricing," to encourage patients to select lower-price ambulatory surgery centers instead of expensive hospital outpatient departments. This article analyzes the impact of such benefit designs for cataract removal surgery from the period 2009-13, using data on 2,347 surgical patients covered by the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), in comparison to 14,867 patients enrolled in non-CalPERS Anthem Blue Cross plans, which are not covered by RBB. After adjusting for changes in patient case-mix and other factors, the shift to RBB was associated with an increase in ambulatory surgery center use by 8.6 percentage points compared to trends among Anthem enrollees. Total employer and employee payments per procedure, after adjusting for changes in case-mix severity and market factors, declined by 19.7 percent compared with Anthem enrollees not subject to RBB. Consumer cost-sharing requirements increased for CalPERS patients who continued to use hospital outpatient departments but who were not exempted from RBB because of geographic or clinical factors. Reference-based benefits for cataract surgery saved CalPERS $1.3 million in the two years after implementation. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Business Of Health; Consumer Issues; Health Spending; Managed Care—Consumers < Managed Care; Managed Competition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732491     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  11 in total

1.  If reference-based benefit designs work, why are they not widely adopted? Insurers and administrators not doing enough to address price variation.

Authors:  Dennis P Scanlon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Trends in Use of Ambulatory Surgery Centers for Cataract Surgery in the United States, 2001-2014.

Authors:  Brian C Stagg; Nidhi Talwar; Cynthia Mattox; Paul P Lee; Joshua D Stein
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Association of Reference Pricing with Drug Selection and Spending.

Authors:  James C Robinson; Christopher M Whaley; Timothy T Brown
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Consumer Choice Between Hospital-Based and Freestanding Facilities for Arthroscopy: Impact on Prices, Spending, and Surgical Complications.

Authors:  James C Robinson; Timothy T Brown; Christopher Whaley; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The Influence of Cost Information on Treatment Choice: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Thompson Zhuang; Joost T P Kortlever; Lauren M Shapiro; Laurence Baker; Alex H S Harris; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Reference-Based Benefits for Colonoscopy and Arthroscopy: Large Differences in Patient Payments Across Procedures but Similar Behavioral Responses.

Authors:  Timothy T Brown; Chaoran Guo; Christopher Whaley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Cost Comparison of Outpatient Versus Inpatient Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dustin L Richter; David R Diduch
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-03-14

8.  The moral hazard effects of consumer responses to targeted cost-sharing.

Authors:  Christopher M Whaley; Chaoran Guo; Timothy T Brown
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Unplanned hospital visits after ambulatory surgical care.

Authors:  Tasce Bongiovanni; Craig Parzynski; Isuru Ranasinghe; Michael A Steinman; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Using the deductible for patient channeling: did preferred providers gain patient volume?

Authors:  Stéphanie A van der Geest; Marco Varkevisser
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.