Literature DB >> 30103654

Reference-Based Benefits for Colonoscopy and Arthroscopy: Large Differences in Patient Payments Across Procedures but Similar Behavioral Responses.

Timothy T Brown1, Chaoran Guo1,2, Christopher Whaley1,3.   

Abstract

This study examines how reference-based benefits (RBB) affect patient out-of-pocket payments across outpatient procedures. The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) implemented RBB asymmetrically for outpatient procedures in 2012, only applying RBB to outpatient procedures performed in a hospital outpatient department (HOPD), and not applying RBB to outpatient procedures performed in a lower cost ambulatory surgery center. Using claims data (2009-2013) on arthroscopy and colonoscopy services, we found that for colonoscopy, CalPERS patients paid an average of 63.9% (p < .01) more for HOPDs than ambulatory surgery centers in 2012. For arthroscopy, no statistically different cost sharing was found on average. However, high-priced HOPDs were 17.3% and 17.9% less likely to be chosen by CalPERS patients in 2012 for colonoscopy and arthroscopy, respectively. These magnitudes increased in 2013 to 25.2% and 24.2% less, respectively. Overall, responsiveness to RBB with regard to the most expensive HOPDs was similar despite varying cost sharing by procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost sharing; difference-in-differences; reference pricing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30103654      PMCID: PMC7853083          DOI: 10.1177/1077558718793325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  9 in total

1.  Reference Pricing Changes The 'Choice Architecture' Of Health Care For Consumers.

Authors:  James C Robinson; Timothy T Brown; Christopher Whaley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Physician response to pay-for-performance: evidence from a natural experiment.

Authors:  Jinhu Li; Jeremiah Hurley; Philip DeCicca; Gioia Buckley
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 4.  The association between health care quality and cost: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter S Hussey; Samuel Wertheimer; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Consumer Choice Between Hospital-Based and Freestanding Facilities for Arthroscopy: Impact on Prices, Spending, and Surgical Complications.

Authors:  James C Robinson; Timothy T Brown; Christopher Whaley; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Reference-based benefit design changes consumers' choices and employers' payments for ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  James C Robinson; Timothy Brown; Christopher Whaley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Increases in consumer cost sharing redirect patient volumes and reduce hospital prices for orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  James C Robinson; Timothy T Brown
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Association of Reference Payment for Colonoscopy With Consumer Choices, Insurer Spending, and Procedural Complications.

Authors:  James C Robinson; Timothy T Brown; Christopher Whaley; Emily Finlayson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Interaction terms in nonlinear models.

Authors:  Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Edward C Norton; Bryan Dowd
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.734

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.