Literature DB >> 25731927

Low-load resistance training promotes muscular adaptation regardless of vascular occlusion, load, or volume.

Larissa Corrêa Barcelos1, Paulo Ricardo Prado Nunes, Luís Ronan Marquez Ferreira de Souza, Anselmo Alves de Oliveira, Roberto Furlanetto, Moacir Marocolo, Fábio Lera Orsatti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigates the impact of two different intensities and different volumes of low-load resistance training (LLRT) with and without blood flow restriction on the adaptation of muscle strength and size.
METHODS: The sample was divided into five groups: one set of 20 % of one repetition maximum (1RM), three sets of 20 % of 1RM, one set of 50 % of 1RM, three sets of 50 % of 1RM, or control. LLRT was performed with (OC) or without (NOC) vascular occlusion, which was selected randomly for each subject. The maximal muscle strength (leg extension; 1RM) and the cross-sectional area (quadriceps; CSA) were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of LLRT.
RESULTS: 1RM performance was increased in both groups after 8 weeks of training: OC (1 × 50 % = 20.6 %; 3 × 50 % = 20.9 %; 1 × 20 % = 26.6 %; 3 × 20 % = 21.6 %) and NOC (1 × 50 % = 18.6 %; 3 × 50 % = 26.8 %; 1 × 20 % = 18.5 %; 3 × 20 % = 21.6 %; 3 × 20 % = 24.7 %) compared with the control group (-1.7 %). Additionally, the CSA was increased in both groups: OC (1 × 50 % = 2.4 %; 3 × 50 % = 3.8 %; 1 × 20 % = 4.6 %; 3 × 20 % = 4.8 %) and NOC (1 × 50 % = 2.4 %; 3 × 50 % = 1.5 %; 1 × 20 % = 4.3 %; 3 × 20 % = 3.8 %) compared with the control group (-0.7 %). There were no significant differences between the OC and NOC groups.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that 8 weeks of LLRT until failure in novice young lifters, regardless of occlusion, load or volume, produces similar magnitudes of muscular hypertrophy and strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25731927     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-015-3141-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  30 in total

Review 1.  Bigger weights may not beget bigger muscles: evidence from acute muscle protein synthetic responses after resistance exercise.

Authors:  Nicholas A Burd; Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.665

2.  Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.

Authors:  Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Leigh Breen; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-04-19

Review 3.  Cross education: possible mechanisms for the contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Blood flow restricted exercise and skeletal muscle health.

Authors:  Todd M Manini; Brian C Clark
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  Acute low-load resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction increased protein signalling and number of satellite cells in human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; William Apro; Gøran Paulsen; Tormod S Nilsen; Eva Blomstrand; Truls Raastad
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.

Authors:  Catherine O Fritz; Peter E Morris; Jennifer J Richler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08-08

7.  Low intensity blood flow restriction training: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy P Loenneke; Jacob M Wilson; Pedro J Marín; Michael C Zourdos; Michael G Bemben
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Effects of resistance training combined with vascular occlusion or hypoxia on neuromuscular function in athletes.

Authors:  Apiwan Manimmanakorn; Nuttaset Manimmanakorn; Robert Taylor; Nick Draper; Francois Billaut; Jeremy P Shearman; Michael J Hamlin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Motor unit recruitment during prolonged isometric contractions.

Authors:  N Fallentin; K Jørgensen; E B Simonsen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

Review 10.  Ischemic strength training: a low-load alternative to heavy resistance exercise?

Authors:  M Wernbom; J Augustsson; T Raastad
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 4.221

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of exercise intensity and occlusion pressure after 12 weeks of resistance training with blood-flow restriction.

Authors:  Manoel E Lixandrão; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Gilberto Laurentino; Cleiton A Libardi; André Y Aihara; Fabiano N Cardoso; Valmor Tricoli; Hamilton Roschel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Do metabolites that are produced during resistance exercise enhance muscle hypertrophy?

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; Matthew B Jessee; Samuel L Buckner; J Grant Mouser; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of 4 weeks of low-load unilateral resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on strength, thickness, V wave, and H reflex of the soleus muscle in men.

Authors:  David Colomer-Poveda; Salvador Romero-Arenas; Antonio Vera-Ibáñez; Manuel Viñuela-García; Gonzalo Márquez
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Intramuscular anabolic signaling and endocrine response following high volume and high intensity resistance exercise protocols in trained men.

Authors:  Adam M Gonzalez; Jay R Hoffman; Jeremy R Townsend; Adam R Jajtner; Carleigh H Boone; Kyle S Beyer; Kayla M Baker; Adam J Wells; Gerald T Mangine; Edward H Robinson; David D Church; Leonardo P Oliveira; Darryn S Willoughby; David H Fukuda; Jeffrey R Stout
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-07

Review 5.  Chronic Effects of Resistance Training in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Wanderson Divino Nilo Dos Santos; Paulo Gentil; Rafael Felipe de Moraes; João Batista Ferreira Júnior; Mário Hebling Campos; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; Ruffo Freitas Júnior; Martim Bottaro; Carlos Alexandre Vieira
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Cardiovascular response to bouts of exercise with blood flow restriction.

Authors:  Kestutis Bunevicius; Arturas Sujeta; Kristina Poderiene; Birute Zachariene; Viktoras Silinskas; Rimantas Minkevicius; Jonas Poderys
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-12-27

7.  Ability to predict repetitions to momentary failure is not perfectly accurate, though improves with resistance training experience.

Authors:  James Steele; Andreas Endres; James Fisher; Paulo Gentil; Jürgen Giessing
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The influence of considering individual resistance training variables as a whole on muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Philip M Lyristakis; Daniel W T Wundersitz; Emma K Zadow; George Mnatzaganian; Brett A Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.