Literature DB >> 25731916

Factors Underlying Quality Problems with Alcohol Screening Prompted by a Clinical Reminder in Primary Care: A Multi-site Qualitative Study.

Emily C Williams1, Carol E Achtmeyer, Rachel M Thomas, Joel R Grossbard, Gwen T Lapham, Laura J Chavez, Evette J Ludman, Douglas Berger, Katharine A Bradley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population-based alcohol screening is recommended in primary care, and increasingly incentivized by policies, yet is challenging to implement. The U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VA) achieved high rates of screening using a national performance measure and associated electronic clinical reminder to prompt and facilitate screening and document results. However, the sensitivity of alcohol screening for identifying unhealthy alcohol use is low in VA clinics.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand factors that might contribute to low sensitivity of alcohol screening.
DESIGN: This was an observational, qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included clinical staff responsible for conducting alcohol screening and nine independently managed primary care clinics of a single VA medical center in the Northwestern U.S. APPROACH: Four researchers observed clinical staff as they conducted alcohol screening. Observers took handwritten notes, which were transcribed and coded iteratively. Template analysis identified a priori and emergent themes. KEY
RESULTS: We observed 72 instances of alcohol screening conducted by 31 participating staff. Observations confirmed known challenges to implementation of care using clinical reminders, including workflow and flexibility limitations. Three themes specific to alcohol screening emerged. First, most observed screening was conducted verbally, guided by the clinical reminder, although some variability in approaches to screening (e.g., paper-based or laminate-based screening) was observed. Second, specific verbal screening practices that might contribute to low sensitivity of clinical screening were identified, including conducting non-verbatim screening and making inferences, assumptions, and/or suggestions to input responses. Third, staff introduced and adapted screening questions to enhance patient comfort.
CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study in nine clinics found that implementation of alcohol screening facilitated by a clinical reminder resulted primarily in verbal screening in which questions were not asked vertbatim and were otherwise adapted. Non-verbal approaches to screening, or patient self-administration, may enhance validity and standardization of screening while simultaneously addressing limitations of the clinical reminder and issues related to perceived discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25731916      PMCID: PMC4510245          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3248-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  49 in total

1.  Meeting the challenges for research and practice for brief alcohol intervention.

Authors:  Anne Moyer; John W Finney
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Variation in implementation and use of computerized clinical reminders in an integrated healthcare system.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Juliet N Woods; Steven M Asch; Peter Glassman; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 3.  Effectiveness of strategies to implement brief alcohol intervention in primary healthcare. A systematic review.

Authors:  Per Nilsen; Mauri Aalto; Preben Bendtsen; Kaija Seppä
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Qualitative evaluation to explain success of multifaceted technology-driven hypertension intervention.

Authors:  Mari Millery; Donna Shelley; Daren Wu; Pamela Ferrari; Tuo-Yen Tseng; Helene Kopal
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Electronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinical reminder system improves adherence to practice guidelines among the University of Washington HIV Study Cohort.

Authors:  Mari M Kitahata; Peter W Dillingham; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Susan E Buskin; Jeffrey L Jones; Robert D Harrington; Thomas M Hooton; King K Holmes
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Examining quality issues in alcohol misuse screening.

Authors:  Eric J Hawkins; Daniel R Kivlahan; Emily C Williams; Steven M Wright; Thomas Craig; Katharine A Bradley
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.716

9.  Central implementation strategies outperform local ones in improving HIV testing in Veterans Healthcare Administration facilities.

Authors:  Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Tuyen Hoang; Herschel Knapp; Jane Burgess; Michael D Fletcher; Allen L Gifford; Steven M Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Effectiveness of the AUDIT-C as a screening test for alcohol misuse in three race/ethnic groups.

Authors:  Danielle Frank; Anna F DeBenedetti; Robert J Volk; Emily C Williams; Daniel R Kivlahan; Katharine A Bradley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  In the Clinic. Alcohol Use.

Authors:  E Jennifer Edelman; David A Fiellin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Utility of routine alcohol screening for monitoring changes in alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Anna D Rubinsky; Laura J Chavez; Douglas Berger; Gwen T Lapham; Eric J Hawkins; Emily C Williams; Katharine A Bradley
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Capsule Commentary on Williams et al., Factors Underlying Quality Problems with Alcohol Screening Prompted by a Clinical Reminder in Primary Care: A Multisite Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sarah M Bagley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Implementing electronic substance use disorder and depression and anxiety screening and behavioral interventions in primary care clinics serving people with HIV: Protocol for the Promoting Access to Care Engagement (PACE) trial.

Authors:  Derek D Satre; Alexandra N Anderson; Amy S Leibowitz; Tory Levine-Hall; Sally Slome; Jason Flamm; C Bradley Hare; Jennifer McNeely; Constance M Weisner; Michael A Horberg; Paul Volberding; Michael J Silverberg
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Receipt of alcohol-related care among patients with HCV and unhealthy alcohol use.

Authors:  Mandy D Owens; George N Ioannou; Judith L Tsui; E Jennifer Edelman; Preston A Greene; Emily C Williams
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Comparison of AUDIT-C collected via electronic medical record and self-administered research survey in HIV infected and uninfected patients.

Authors:  Kathleen A McGinnis; Janet P Tate; Emily C Williams; Melissa Skanderson; Kendall J Bryant; Adam J Gordon; Kevin L Kraemer; Stephen A Maisto; Steven Crystal; David A Fiellin; Amy C Justice
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Alcohol screening and brief intervention in a representative sample of veterans receiving primary care services.

Authors:  Rachel L Bachrach; John R Blosnich; Emily C Williams
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-09-08

8.  Differences in Receipt of Alcohol-Related Care Across Rurality Among VA Patients Living With HIV With Unhealthy Alcohol Use.

Authors:  Kara M Bensley; John Fortney; Gary Chan; Julia C Dombrowski; India Ornelas; Anna D Rubinsky; Gwen T Lapham; Joseph E Glass; Emily C Williams
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Feasibility and acceptability of an audio computer-assisted self-interview version of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in primary care patients.

Authors:  Suzanne E Spear; Michele Shedlin; Brian Gilberti; Maya Fiellin; Jennifer McNeely
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.716

10.  Alcohol screening scores and the risk of intensive care unit admission and hospital readmission.

Authors:  Brendan J Clark; Anna D Rubinsky; P Michael Ho; David H Au; Laura J Chavez; Marc Moss; Katharine A Bradley
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.