Rachel L Bachrach1, John R Blosnich2, Emily C Williams3. 1. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive C, Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA; Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive C, Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA. Electronic address: Rachel.Bachrach2@va.gov. 2. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive C, Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Montefiore, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Suite W933, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: John.Blosnich@va.gov. 3. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, 1660 Columbian Way S. (S-152), Seattle, WA 98108, USA; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: Emily.Williams3@va.gov.
Abstract
AIMS: Unhealthy alcohol use is common among adults, and in particular, Veterans. Routine alcohol screening followed by brief intervention is recommended and considered a prevention priority in primary care settings. While previous studies have found that Veterans enrolled in the Veteran's Health Administration (VA) receive high rates of screening and brief intervention, less than 50% of Veterans receive VA health care. No study has evaluated receipt of these services in a general sample of Veterans. Therefore, in a nationally-representative sample, we examine whether Veteran status was associated with receiving alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care. METHODS: Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, we identified adults who endorsed visiting a doctor for routine checkup at least once in the past two years and responded to an optional module assessing alcohol-related care (N = 92,206; 14.1% Veterans). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between Veteran status and screening and brief intervention outcomes. We also evaluate differences in alcohol-related care across Veteran status stratified by gender. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics likely to confound the association. RESULTS: Overall, Veterans were more likely than non-Veterans to be screened for alcohol quantity and heavy episodic drinking (ps < 0.05), and more likely to endorse receiving brief intervention advice about alcohol's harmful effects (p < .001). Veteran status predicted an increased likelihood of being screened and receipt of advice about alcohol's harmful effects, but did not predict the likelihood of receiving advice to reduce or abstain from drinking (AOR = 1.00, 95% C.I. [0.80-1.26]). Analyses stratified by gender indicated a similar pattern of results for males as the overall sample. Results among females indicated Veteran status predicted the likelihood of being asked about heavy episodic drinking (AOR = 1.47, 95% C.I. [1.09-1.99]) and being offered advice about the harmful effects of alcohol (AOR = 1.62, 95% C.I. [1.06-2.48]). Female Veterans were not more likely than female non-Veterans to be advised to reduce and/or abstain from drinking. CONCLUSIONS: Screening about any alcohol use was common while report of screening for quantity and heavy episodic drinking occurrence and report of brief intervention were less common. Veterans were more likely than non-Veterans to report receiving recommended care, though rates of advice to reduce or abstain from drinking did not differ across groups. Persistent gaps in delivery of recommended alcohol-related care, especially for particularly vulnerable subpopulations such as women Veterans, suggest a need for quality improvement. Published by Elsevier Inc.
AIMS: Unhealthy alcohol use is common among adults, and in particular, Veterans. Routine alcohol screening followed by brief intervention is recommended and considered a prevention priority in primary care settings. While previous studies have found that Veterans enrolled in the Veteran's Health Administration (VA) receive high rates of screening and brief intervention, less than 50% of Veterans receive VA health care. No study has evaluated receipt of these services in a general sample of Veterans. Therefore, in a nationally-representative sample, we examine whether Veteran status was associated with receiving alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care. METHODS: Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, we identified adults who endorsed visiting a doctor for routine checkup at least once in the past two years and responded to an optional module assessing alcohol-related care (N = 92,206; 14.1% Veterans). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between Veteran status and screening and brief intervention outcomes. We also evaluate differences in alcohol-related care across Veteran status stratified by gender. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics likely to confound the association. RESULTS: Overall, Veterans were more likely than non-Veterans to be screened for alcohol quantity and heavy episodic drinking (ps < 0.05), and more likely to endorse receiving brief intervention advice about alcohol's harmful effects (p < .001). Veteran status predicted an increased likelihood of being screened and receipt of advice about alcohol's harmful effects, but did not predict the likelihood of receiving advice to reduce or abstain from drinking (AOR = 1.00, 95% C.I. [0.80-1.26]). Analyses stratified by gender indicated a similar pattern of results for males as the overall sample. Results among females indicated Veteran status predicted the likelihood of being asked about heavy episodic drinking (AOR = 1.47, 95% C.I. [1.09-1.99]) and being offered advice about the harmful effects of alcohol (AOR = 1.62, 95% C.I. [1.06-2.48]). Female Veterans were not more likely than female non-Veterans to be advised to reduce and/or abstain from drinking. CONCLUSIONS: Screening about any alcohol use was common while report of screening for quantity and heavy episodic drinking occurrence and report of brief intervention were less common. Veterans were more likely than non-Veterans to report receiving recommended care, though rates of advice to reduce or abstain from drinking did not differ across groups. Persistent gaps in delivery of recommended alcohol-related care, especially for particularly vulnerable subpopulations such as women Veterans, suggest a need for quality improvement. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Britta L Anderson; Elizabeth Parra Dang; R Louise Floyd; Robert Sokol; Jeanne Mahoney; Jay Schulkin Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Gwen T Lapham; Carol E Achtmeyer; Emily C Williams; Eric J Hawkins; Daniel R Kivlahan; Katharine A Bradley Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Emily C Williams; Anna D Rubinsky; Laura J Chavez; Gwen T Lapham; Stacey E Rittmueller; Carol E Achtmeyer; Katharine A Bradley Journal: Addiction Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Daniel E Jonas; James C Garbutt; Halle R Amick; Janice M Brown; Kimberly A Brownley; Carol L Council; Anthony J Viera; Tania M Wilkins; Cody J Schwartz; Emily M Richmond; John Yeatts; Tammeka Swinson Evans; Sally D Wood; Russell P Harris Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Evelyn P Whitlock; Michael R Polen; Carla A Green; Tracy Orleans; Jonathan Klein Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-04-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Emily C Williams; Olivia V Fletcher; Madeline C Frost; Alex H S Harris; Donna L Washington; Katherine J Hoggatt Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Jessica A Chen; Joseph E Glass; Kara M K Bensley; Simon B Goldberg; Keren Lehavot; Emily C Williams Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-07-15
Authors: Maria R Khan; Kailyn E Young; Ellen C Caniglia; David A Fiellin; Stephen A Maisto; Brandon D L Marshall; E Jennifer Edelman; Julie R Gaither; Natalie E Chichetto; Janet Tate; Kendall J Bryant; MacRegga Severe; Elizabeth R Stevens; Amy Justice; Scott R Braithwaite Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-03-02
Authors: Isabel G Jacobson; Emily C Williams; Amber D Seelig; Alyson J Littman; Charles C Maynard; Jonathan B Bricker; Rudolph P Rull; Edward J Boyko Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2020 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Nadia Minian; Anna Ivanova; Sabrina Voci; Scott Veldhuizen; Laurie Zawertailo; Dolly Baliunas; Aliya Noormohamed; Norman Giesbrecht; Peter Selby Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.390