Suzanne E Spear1, Michele Shedlin2, Brian Gilberti3, Maya Fiellin3, Jennifer McNeely3. 1. a California State University , Northridge , California , USA. 2. b New York University College of Nursing , New York , New York , USA. 3. c New York University School of Medicine , New York , New York , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study explores the feasibility and acceptability of a computer self-administered approach to substance use screening from the perspective of primary care patients. METHODS: Forty-eight patients from a large safety net hospital in New York City completed an audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) version of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) and a qualitative interview to assess feasibility and acceptability, comprehension, comfort with screening questions, and preferences for screening mode (interviewer or computer). Qualitative data analysis organized the participants' feedback into major themes. RESULTS: Participants overwhelmingly reported being comfortable with the ACASI ASSIST. Mean administration time was 5.2 minutes (range: 1.6-14.8 minutes). The major themes from the qualitative interviews were (1) ACASI ASSIST is feasible and acceptable to patients, (2) Social stigma around substance use is a barrier to patient disclosure, and (3) ACASI screening should not preclude personal interaction with providers. CONCLUSIONS: The ACASI ASSIST is an appropriate and feasible approach to substance use screening in primary care. Because of the highly sensitive nature of substance use, screening tools must explain the purpose of screening, assure patients that their privacy is protected, and inform patients of the opportunity to discuss their screening results with their provider.
BACKGROUND: This study explores the feasibility and acceptability of a computer self-administered approach to substance use screening from the perspective of primary care patients. METHODS: Forty-eight patients from a large safety net hospital in New York City completed an audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) version of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) and a qualitative interview to assess feasibility and acceptability, comprehension, comfort with screening questions, and preferences for screening mode (interviewer or computer). Qualitative data analysis organized the participants' feedback into major themes. RESULTS:Participants overwhelmingly reported being comfortable with the ACASI ASSIST. Mean administration time was 5.2 minutes (range: 1.6-14.8 minutes). The major themes from the qualitative interviews were (1) ACASI ASSIST is feasible and acceptable to patients, (2) Social stigma around substance use is a barrier to patient disclosure, and (3) ACASI screening should not preclude personal interaction with providers. CONCLUSIONS: The ACASI ASSIST is an appropriate and feasible approach to substance use screening in primary care. Because of the highly sensitive nature of substance use, screening tools must explain the purpose of screening, assure patients that their privacy is protected, and inform patients of the opportunity to discuss their screening results with their provider.
Entities:
Keywords:
ACASI; ASSIST; prevention; screening; substance use
Authors: M Mofizul Islam; Libby Topp; Katherine M Conigrave; Ann White; Sharon E Reid; Sara Grummett; Paul S Haber; Carolyn A Day Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2012-08-29
Authors: Katharine A Bradley; Gwen T Lapham; Eric J Hawkins; Carol E Achtmeyer; Emily C Williams; Rachel M Thomas; Daniel R Kivlahan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Richard Saitz; Tibor P Palfai; Naomi Freedner; Michael R Winter; Alexandra Macdonald; John Lu; Al Ozonoff; David L Rosenbloom; William Dejong Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2006-11-26 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Theresa E Perlis; Don C Des Jarlais; Samuel R Friedman; Kamyar Arasteh; Charles F Turner Journal: Addiction Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Jennifer McNeely; Shiela M Strauss; John Rotrosen; Arianne Ramautar; Marc N Gourevitch Journal: Addiction Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Evelyn P Whitlock; Michael R Polen; Carla A Green; Tracy Orleans; Jonathan Klein Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-04-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Graeme B Wilson; Catherine A Lock; Nick Heather; Paul Cassidy; Marilyn M Christie; Eileen F S Kaner Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Norah Mulvaney-Day; Tina Marshall; Kathryn Downey Piscopo; Neil Korsen; Sean Lynch; Lucy H Karnell; Garrett E Moran; Allen S Daniels; Sushmita Shoma Ghose Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jennifer McNeely; Angéline Adam; John Rotrosen; Sarah E Wakeman; Timothy E Wilens; Joseph Kannry; Richard N Rosenthal; Aimee Wahle; Seth Pitts; Sarah Farkas; Carmen Rosa; Lauren Peccoralo; Eva Waite; Aida Vega; Jennifer Kent; Catherine K Craven; Tamar A Kaminski; Elizabeth Firmin; Benjamin Isenberg; Melanie Harris; Andre Kushniruk; Leah Hamilton Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-05-03
Authors: Jennifer McNeely; Pritika C Kumar; Traci Rieckmann; Erica Sedlander; Sarah Farkas; Christine Chollak; Joseph L Kannry; Aida Vega; Eva A Waite; Lauren A Peccoralo; Richard N Rosenthal; Dennis McCarty; John Rotrosen Journal: Addict Sci Clin Pract Date: 2018-04-09
Authors: Anne K Monroe; Sarah M Jabour; Sebastian Peña; Jeanne C Keruly; Richard D Moore; Geetanjali Chander; Kristin A Riekert Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jennifer McNeely; Li-Tzy Wu; Geetha Subramaniam; Gaurav Sharma; Lauretta A Cathers; Dace Svikis; Luke Sleiter; Linnea Russell; Courtney Nordeck; Anjalee Sharma; Kevin E O'Grady; Leah B Bouk; Carol Cushing; Jacqueline King; Aimee Wahle; Robert P Schwartz Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 25.391