Literature DB >> 25729452

Using online crowdsourcing to understand young adult attitudes toward expert-authored messages aimed at reducing hazardous alcohol consumption and to collect peer-authored messages.

Jeffrey Kristan1, Brian Suffoletto1.   

Abstract

Text message delivered prevention interventions have the potential to improve health behaviors on a large scale, including reducing hazardous alcohol consumption in young adults. Online crowdsourcing can be used to efficiently develop relevant messages, but remains largely understudied. This study aims to use online crowdsourcing to evaluate young adult attitudes toward expert-authored messages and to collect peer-authored messages. We designed an online survey with four drinking scenarios and a demographic questionnaire. We made it available to people who reported age 18-25 years, residence in the US, and any lifetime alcohol consumption via the Amazon Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing platform. Participants rated 71 sample text messages on instrumental (helpful) and affective (interesting) attitude scales and generated their own messages. All messages were coded as informational, motivational, or strategy facilitating. We examined differences in attitudes by message type and by drinking status and sex. We surveyed 272 participants in 48 h, and 222 were included in analysis for a total participant payment cost of $178. Sample mean age was 23 years old, with 50 % being female, 65 % being of white race, and 78 % scored as hazardous drinkers. Informational messages were rated the most helpful, whereas motivational messages were rated the most interesting. Hazardous drinkers rated informational messages less helpful than non-hazardous drinkers. Men reported messages less helpful and interesting than women for most categories. Young adults authored 161 messages, with the highest proportion being motivational. Young adults had variable instrumental and affective attitudes toward expert-authored messages. They generated a substantial number of peer-authored messages that could enhance relevance of future alcohol prevention interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crowdsourcing; Intervention; Young adult

Year:  2015        PMID: 25729452      PMCID: PMC4332899          DOI: 10.1007/s13142-014-0298-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  25 in total

1.  Prevention efforts underlying decreases in binge drinking at institutions of higher education.

Authors:  Andris Ziemelis; Ronald B Bucknam; Abdulaziz M Elfessi
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2002-03

2.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Christina N Benac; Melissa S Harris
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Which heavy drinking college students benefit from a brief motivational intervention?

Authors:  Kate B Carey; James M Henson; Michael P Carey; Stephen A Maisto
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-08

4.  Correlates of protective behavior utilization among heavy-drinking college students.

Authors:  Scott T Walters; Bahman S Roudsari; Amanda M Vader; T Robert Harris
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Susan A Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Impact of a text messaging pilot program on patient medication adherence.

Authors:  Kalee F Foreman; Karen M Stockl; Lisa B Le; Eric Fisk; Sameer M Shah; Heidi C Lew; Brian K Solow; Bradford S Curtis
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research.

Authors:  Tara S Behrend; David J Sharek; Adam W Meade; Eric N Wiebe
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-09

8.  What do college student drinkers want to know? Student perceptions of alcohol-related feedback.

Authors:  Mary Beth Miller; Thad R Leffingwell
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-03

9.  Crowdsourced peer- versus expert-written smoking-cessation messages.

Authors:  Heather L Coley; Rajani S Sadasivam; Jessica H Williams; Julie E Volkman; Yu-Mei Schoenberger; Connie L Kohler; Heather Sobko; Midge N Ray; Jeroan J Allison; Daniel E Ford; Gregg H Gilbert; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Using crowdsourcing technology for testing multilingual public health promotion materials.

Authors:  Anne M Turner; Katrin Kirchhoff; Daniel Capurro
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  21 in total

1.  Crowdsourced Health Data: Comparability to a US National Survey, 2013-2015.

Authors:  Veronica Yank; Sanjhavi Agarwal; Pooja Loftus; Steven Asch; David Rehkopf
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Patient engagement and the design of digital health.

Authors:  Faith Birnbaum; Dana Lewis; Rochelle K Rosen; Megan L Ranney
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  "Energy is a Finite Resource": Designing Technology to Support Individuals across Fluctuating Symptoms of Depression.

Authors:  Rachel Kornfield; Renwen Zhang; Jennifer Nicholas; Stephen M Schueller; Scott A Cambo; David C Mohr; Madhu Reddy
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2020-04

4.  Involving Crowdworkers with Lived Experience in Content-Development for Push-Based Digital Mental Health Tools: Lessons Learned from Crowdsourcing Mental Health Messages.

Authors:  Rachel Kornfield; David C Mohr; Rachel Ranney; Emily G Lattie; Jonah Meyerhoff; Joseph J Williams; Madhu Reddy
Journal:  Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact       Date:  2022-04-07

5.  What Would an HIV Cure Mean to You? Qualitative Analysis from a Crowdsourcing Contest in Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Alice Zhang; Xin Pan; Feng Wu; Yang Zhao; Fengyu Hu; Linghua Li; Weiping Cai; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.205

6.  Crowdsourcing and the Accuracy of Online Information Regarding Weight Gain in Pregnancy: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Tammy Chang; Bianca A Verma; Trevor Shull; Michelle H Moniz; Lauren Kohatsu; Melissa A Plegue; Kevyn Collins-Thompson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Process evaluation of TXT2BFiT: a multi-component mHealth randomised controlled trial to prevent weight gain in young adults.

Authors:  Stephanie R Partridge; Margaret Allman-Farinelli; Kevin McGeechan; Kate Balestracci; Annette T Y Wong; Lana Hebden; Mark F Harris; Adrian Bauman; Philayrath Phongsavan
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Improving Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: Can Mobile Health Interventions Affect Behavior?

Authors:  Lauren S Chernick
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  An Interactive Text Message Intervention to Reduce Binge Drinking in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 9-Month Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian Suffoletto; Jeffrey Kristan; Tammy Chung; Kwonho Jeong; Anthony Fabio; Peter Monti; Duncan B Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Optimizing a Text Message Intervention to Reduce Heavy Drinking in Young Adults: Focus Group Findings.

Authors:  Brian Suffoletto; Jeffrey Kristan; Laurel Person Mecca; Tammy Chung; Duncan B Clark
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.