Literature DB >> 23506366

What do college student drinkers want to know? Student perceptions of alcohol-related feedback.

Mary Beth Miller1, Thad R Leffingwell.   

Abstract

Despite major advances and success in finding effective interventions for problematic drinking among college students, personalized feedback interventions (PFIs) continue to include a range of components that vary widely across intervention trials. To facilitate research regarding which feedback components may be most effective, the present research provides preliminary evidence regarding student perceptions of and preferences for different types of feedback components. Undergraduate student drinkers (n = 397, 41% male) rated their affinity for and skepticism of 14 feedback components and identified the feedback components that they most preferred. The majority of students preferred information regarding descriptive normative comparisons and the practical costs of drinking, whereas few reported a desire to learn behavioral strategies to limit risk or didactic information. High-risk drinkers (n = 228) reported lower ratings for all feedback components than did low-risk drinkers, and men (n = 162, 41%) provided significantly lower ratings for all feedback components than did women. This is the first study to document student preferences for the different feedback components included in PFIs. The current study generates hypotheses regarding components that may increase the efficacy of current feedback interventions for high-risk drinking. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23506366     DOI: 10.1037/a0031380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  7 in total

1.  Using online crowdsourcing to understand young adult attitudes toward expert-authored messages aimed at reducing hazardous alcohol consumption and to collect peer-authored messages.

Authors:  Jeffrey Kristan; Brian Suffoletto
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  In pursuit of a self-sustaining college alcohol intervention: Deploying gamified PNF in the real world.

Authors:  Andrew M Earle; Joseph W LaBrie; Sarah C Boyle; Daniel Smith
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Mandated college students' response to sequentially administered alcohol interventions in a randomized clinical trial using stepped care.

Authors:  Brian Borsari; Molly Magill; Nadine R Mastroleo; John T P Hustad; Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw; Nancy P Barnett; Christopher W Kahler; Erica Eaton; Peter M Monti
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2015-10-12

4.  Descriptive norms and expectancies as mediators of a brief motivational intervention for mandated college students receiving stepped care for alcohol use.

Authors:  Ali M Yurasek; Brian Borsari; Molly Magill; Nadine R Mastroleo; John T P Hustad; Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw; Nancy P Barnett; Christopher W Kahler; Peter M Monti
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2015-06-22

5.  Do my peers approve? Interest in injunctive norms feedback delivered online to college student drinkers.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Mary Beth Miller; Sara G Balestrieri; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Phone-delivered brief motivational interventions for mandated college students delivered during the summer months.

Authors:  Brian Borsari; Erica Eaton Short; Nadine R Mastroleo; John T P Hustad; Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw; Nancy P Barnett; Christopher W Kahler; Peter M Monti
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-01-13

7.  Patients' experiences of alcohol screening and advice in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Amy O'Donnell; Barbara Hanratty; Bernd Schulte; Eileen Kaner
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.