Literature DB >> 2572911

Endosonography: promising method for diagnosis of extrahepatic cholestasis.

P Amouyal1, L Palazzo, G Amouyal, P Ponsot, D Mompoint, V Vilgrain, B Gayet, J F Fléjou, J A Paolaggi.   

Abstract

Endosonography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography (CT) were carried out prospectively in 52 patients with extrahepatic cholestasis. 35 patients had extrahepatic biliary obstructions (21 tumorous, 14 non-tumorous) and 17, with recent gallstone migration within the bile duct, had no extrahepatic obstruction at the time of investigation. The definitive diagnosis was established by surgery (in 39 patients), by transendoscopic sphincterotomy (11 patients), or by retrograde biliary opacification (2 patients). Endosonography was significantly more sensitive than ultrasonography or CT (100% vs 80% and 83%, respectively) in making a positive diagnosis of obstruction. Endosonography was also significantly more accurate than ultrasonography or CT (97% vs 49% and 66%) in diagnosing the cause of the obstruction and more effective in the assessment of the locoregional spread of tumorous obstructions (75% vs 38% and 62%). Thus, endosonography was superior to ultrasonography and CT in the diagnosis and staging of biliary obstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2572911     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91801-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  14 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasonography for evaluating patients with recurrent pancreatitis.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Petrone; Paolo G Arcidiacono; Pier Alberto Testoni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Biliary tract obstruction in chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Abdul A Abdallah; Jake E J Krige; Philippus C Bornman
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Endoscopic ultrasound examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract using a curved-array transducer. A preliminary report.

Authors:  P Vilmann; S Khattar; S Hancke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and microscopic examination of duodenal bile in the diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis in 45 patients with normal conventional ultrasonography.

Authors:  P Dahan; C Andant; P Lévy; P Amouyal; G Amouyal; M Dumont; S Erlinger; A Sauvanet; J Belghiti; M Zins; V Vilgrain; P Bernades
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound in common bile duct dilatation with normal liver enzymes.

Authors:  Claudio De Angelis; Milena Marietti; Mauro Bruno; Rinaldo Pellicano; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 6.  The role of endoscopic ultrasound in hepatobiliary disease.

Authors:  David A Schwartz; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-02

7.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary pathology.

Authors:  S Palmucci; L A Mauro; S La Scola; S Incarbone; G Bonanno; P Milone; A Russo; G C Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Pancreatico-biliary endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review of the levels of evidence, performance and outcomes.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Dimitrios Kypraios; Giancarlo Caletti; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Management of biliary and duodenal complications of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Joseph D Vijungco; Richard A Prinz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.