Literature DB >> 25728756

Miniaturized Reveal LINQ insertable cardiac monitoring system: First-in-human experience.

Helmut Pürerfellner1, Prashanthan Sanders2, Evgeny Pokushalov3, Marco Di Bacco4, Tracy Bergemann5, Lukas R C Dekker6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Reveal LINQ is a miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) with wireless telemetry for remote monitoring of patients with suspected arrhythmias.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the functionality of the Reveal LINQ system by measuring R-wave sensing and data transmission.
METHODS: The Reveal LINQ Usability Study was a nonrandomized, prospective, multicenter trial. The study enrolled 30 patients with any indication for an ICM. Data were collected at baseline, implantation, and 1-month follow-up visits and through daily wireless transmissions.
RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled and had a Reveal LINQ device implanted. The mean age was 55 ± 15 years. All patients had successful implantation of the ICM in one of the recommended locations. Ease of implantation procedure was rated as easy or very easy for 90% of implantations. R-wave amplitudes were 0.584 ± 0.325 mV at implantation and 0.596 ± 0.336 mV at 1 month (P = .8). Automatic transmissions were successful 79.5% (69.5%-86.9%) of the time. Transmission failures that caused a delay in data transfer occurred because of incomplete data reception or patients being out of range in 45% and 42% of instances, respectively. For all patients, transmission failures were followed by successful automated or manual transmission of information on a subsequent day. The devices stored 217 arrhythmic episodes during 30 days of follow-up, identified as atrial fibrillation (n = 111), asystole (n = 95), bradycardia (n = 4), fast ventricular tachycardia (n = 1), and ventricular tachycardia ( n = 6). No serious procedure- or system-related adverse events occurred during the 1-month follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: The miniaturized Reveal LINQ ICM supports arrhythmia detection and monitoring, achieving adequate sensing performance without safety issues. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01965899.
Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arrhythmia; Atrial fibrillation; Remote monitoring; Syncope

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728756     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  21 in total

Review 1.  Current rare indications and future directions for implantable loop recorders.

Authors:  Simon Wechselberger; Christopher Piorkowski; Matthias Pohl
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Atrial Fibrillation Monitoring in Cryptogenic Stroke: the Gaps Between Evidence and Practice.

Authors:  Krittapoom Akrawinthawong; Karthik Venkatesh Prasad; Ali Akbar Mehdirad; Scott Wayne Ferreira
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Placement of Reveal LINQ Device in the Left Anterior Axillary Position.

Authors:  Heather Anderson; Joseph Dearani; M Yasir Qureshi; Kimberly Holst; Patrick O'Leary; Bryan Cannon; Philip Wackel
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  PULSE-SMART: Pulse-Based Arrhythmia Discrimination Using a Novel Smartphone Application.

Authors:  David D McMANUS; Jo Woon Chong; Apurv Soni; Jane S Saczynski; Nada Esa; Craig Napolitano; Chad E Darling; Edward Boyer; Rochelle K Rosen; Kevin C Floyd; Ki H Chon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-11-13

5.  Recommendations on the utilization of telemedicine in cardiology.

Authors:  Michael Gruska; Gerhard Aigner; Johann Altenberger; Dagmar Burkart-Küttner; Lukas Fiedler; Marianne Gwechenberger; Peter Lercher; Martin Martinek; Michael Nürnberg; Gerhard Pölzl; Gerold Porenta; Stefan Sauermann; Christoph Schukro; Daniel Scherr; Clemens Steinwender; Markus Stühlinger; Alexander Teubl
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Detection of Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Ablation: Conventional Versus Continuous Monitoring.

Authors:  Ralph J Damiano; Christopher P Lawrance; Lindsey L Saint; Matthew C Henn; Laurie A Sinn; Jane Kruse; Marye J Gleva; Hersh S Maniar; Patrick M McCarthy; Richard Lee
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Implantable cardiac monitors to detect atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Steven J Edwards; Victoria Wakefield; Tracey Jhita; Kayleigh Kew; Peter Cain; Gemma Marceniuk
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Effect of citric-acid dialysate on the QTC-interval.

Authors:  Karlien J Ter Meulen; Ben J M Hermans; Frank M van der Sande; Bernard Canaud; Constantijn J A M Konings; Jeroen P Kooman; Tammo Delhaas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Auxiliary Diagnostic Value of a Novel Wearable Electrocardiogram-Recording System for Arrhythmia Detection: Diagnostic Trial.

Authors:  Shaomin Zhang; Hong Xian; Yi Chen; Yue Liao; Nan Zhang; Xinyu Guo; Ming Yang; Jinhui Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 10.  Heart Rhythm Monitoring Strategies for Cryptogenic Stroke: 2015 Diagnostics and Monitoring Stroke Focus Group Report.

Authors:  Gregory W Albers; Richard A Bernstein; Johannes Brachmann; John Camm; J Donald Easton; Peter Fromm; Shinya Goto; Christopher B Granger; Stefan H Hohnloser; Elaine Hylek; Amir K Jaffer; Derk W Krieger; Rod Passman; Jesse M Pines; Shelby D Reed; Peter M Rothwell; Peter R Kowey
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.