Literature DB >> 25728722

A randomized trial of continuous versus interrupted chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: rationale for and design of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Continuous Chest Compressions Trial.

Siobhan P Brown1, Henry Wang2, Tom P Aufderheide3, Christian Vaillancourt4, Robert H Schmicker5, Sheldon Cheskes6, Ron Straight7, Peter Kudenchuk5, Laurie Morrison6, M Riccardo Colella3, Joseph Condle8, George Gamez9, David Hostler8, Tami Kayea9, Sally Ragsdale5, Shannon Stephens2, Graham Nichol5.   

Abstract

The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium is conducting a randomized trial comparing survival with hospital discharge after continuous chest compressions without interruption for ventilation versus currently recommended American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation with interrupted chest compressions in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without obvious trauma or respiratory cause. Emergency medical services perform study cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 3 intervals of manual chest compressions (each ~2 minutes) or until restoration of spontaneous circulation. Patients randomized to the continuous chest compression intervention receive 200 chest compressions with positive pressure ventilations at a rate of 10/min without interruption in compressions. Those randomized to the interrupted chest compression study arm receive chest compressions interrupted for positive pressure ventilations at a compression:ventilation ratio of 30:2. In either group, each interval of compressions is followed by rhythm analysis and defibrillation as required. Insertion of an advanced airway is deferred for the first ≥6 minutes to reduce interruptions in either study arm. The study uses a cluster randomized design with every-6-month crossovers. The primary outcome is survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes are neurologically intact survival and adverse events. A maximum of 23,600 patients (11,800 per group) enrolled during the post-run-in phase of the study will provide ≥90% power to detect a relative change of 16% in the rate of survival to discharge, 8.1% to 9.4% with overall significance level of 0.05. If this trial demonstrates improved survival with either strategy, >3,000 premature deaths from cardiac arrest would be averted annually.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25728722      PMCID: PMC4363111          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  43 in total

1.  Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Benjamin S Abella; Jason P Alvarado; Helge Myklebust; Dana P Edelson; Anne Barry; Nicholas O'Hearn; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Lance B Becker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Cardiocerebral resuscitation: the new cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Gordon A Ewy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Hawthorne effect: implications for prehospital research.

Authors:  J P Campbell; V A Maxey; W A Watson
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Improved outcome for patients with a cardiac arrest by supervision of the emergency medical services system.

Authors:  J G van der Hoeven; J de Koning; P K van der Weyden; A E Meinders
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.422

6.  The need for ventilatory support during bystander CPR.

Authors:  R A Berg; D Wilcoxson; R W Hilwig; K B Kern; A B Sanders; C W Otto; D K Eklund; G A Ewy
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  "Bystander" chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless "cardiac arrest".

Authors:  R A Berg; R W Hilwig; K B Kern; G A Ewy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Observations of ventilation during resuscitation in a canine model.

Authors:  N C Chandra; K G Gruben; J E Tsitlik; R Brower; A D Guerci; H H Halperin; M L Weisfeldt; S Permutt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Ventilation caused by external chest compression is unable to sustain effective gas exchange during CPR: a comparison with mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  A H Idris; M J Banner; V Wenzel; R S Fuerst; L B Becker; R J Melker
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Mechanical ventilation may not be essential for initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  M Noc; M H Weil; W Tang; T Turner; M Fukui
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  7 in total

1.  To interrupt, or not to interrupt chest compressions for ventilation: that is the question!

Authors:  Elisabete Aramendi; Unai Irusta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Design and implementation of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART).

Authors:  Henry E Wang; David K Prince; Shannon W Stephens; Heather Herren; Mohamud Daya; Neal Richmond; Jestin Carlson; Craig Warden; M Riccardo Colella; Ashley Brienza; Tom P Aufderheide; Ahamed H Idris; Robert Schmicker; Susanne May; Graham Nichol
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Compression-to-ventilation ratio and incidence of rearrest-A secondary analysis of the ROC CCC trial.

Authors:  David D Salcido; Robert H Schmicker; Jason E Buick; Sheldon Cheskes; Brian Grunau; Peter Kudenchuk; Brian Leroux; Stephanie Zellner; Dana Zive; Tom P Aufderheide; Allison C Koller; Heather Herren; Jack Nuttall; Matthew L Sundermann; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  CPR compression strategy 30:2 is difficult to adhere to, but has better survival than continuous chest compressions when done correctly.

Authors:  Robert H Schmicker; Graham Nichol; Peter Kudenchuk; Jim Christenson; Christian Vaillancourt; Henry E Wang; Tom P Aufderheide; Ahamed H Idris; Mohamud R Daya
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  A Local Sensitivity Analysis of the Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is a Local Protocol Change Required?

Authors:  Brian Grunau; Joel Singer; Terry Lee; Frank X Scheuermeyer; Ron Straight; Robert Schlamp; Robert Wand; William F Dick; Helen Connolly; Sarah Pennington; Jim Christenson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-09-29

6.  After the lights and sirens: Patient access delay in cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jordan L Singer; Vincent N Mosesso
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Door-to-Targeted Temperature Management Initiation Time and Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights From the Continuous Chest Compressions Trial.

Authors:  Dylan Stanger; Takahisa Kawano; Navraj Malhi; Brian Grunau; John Tallon; Graham C Wong; James Christenson; Christopher B Fordyce
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.