Literature DB >> 7656640

Mechanical ventilation may not be essential for initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

M Noc1, M H Weil, W Tang, T Turner, M Fukui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a rodent model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation in which the inspired gas mixture was enriched with oxygen, resuscitability and survival were unaffected by positive pressure ventilation. In the present study, in a larger animal model, tidal volumes generated during precordial compression and with spontaneous gasping were quantitated.
METHODS: Domestic pigs with an average weight of 34 kg were anesthetized with pentobarbital. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced electrically. Precordial compression was begun after 4 min of untreated VF. Each of 22 animals received one of two interventions in conjunction with precordial compression: positive pressure ventilation with oxygen or oxygen supplied at the port of a tracheal tube at ambient pressure. After 8 min of precordial compression, defibrillation was attempted.
RESULTS: Only very moderate increases in arterial PCO2 were documented during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the absence of mechanical ventilation but arterial oxygen tension was consistently in excess of 100 mm Hg. Cardiac resuscitability and 48-h survival were approximately the same in animals maintained on inspired oxygen whether or not they were mechanically ventilated (7/11 or 8/11). In the absence of mechanical ventilation, precordial compression and spontaneous gasping yielded minute volumes that exceeded 5 L.
CONCLUSION: Positive pressure mechanical ventilation did not improve resuscitability or postresuscitation outcome in this porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7656640     DOI: 10.1378/chest.108.3.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  11 in total

1.  A randomized trial of continuous versus interrupted chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: rationale for and design of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Continuous Chest Compressions Trial.

Authors:  Siobhan P Brown; Henry Wang; Tom P Aufderheide; Christian Vaillancourt; Robert H Schmicker; Sheldon Cheskes; Ron Straight; Peter Kudenchuk; Laurie Morrison; M Riccardo Colella; Joseph Condle; George Gamez; David Hostler; Tami Kayea; Sally Ragsdale; Shannon Stephens; Graham Nichol
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Chest compressions versus ventilation plus chest compressions in a pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest animal model.

Authors:  Jose María Iglesias; Jesús López-Herce; Javier Urbano; Maria José Solana; Santiago Mencía; Jimena Del Castillo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Chest compressions versus ventilation plus chest compressions: a randomized trial in a pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest animal model.

Authors:  Marta Botran; Jesus Lopez-Herce; Javier Urbano; Maria J Solana; Ana Garcia; Angel Carrillo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Continued breathing followed by gasping or apnea in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Mathias Zuercher; Gordon A Ewy; Ronald W Hilwig; Arthur B Sanders; Charles W Otto; Robert A Berg; Karl B Kern
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Gasping in response to basic resuscitation efforts: observation in a Swine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Mathias Zuercher; Gordon A Ewy; Charles W Otto; Ronald W Hilwig; Bentley J Bobrow; Lani Clark; Vatsal Chikani; Arthur B Sanders; Robert A Berg; Karl B Kern
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2010-05-31

Review 6.  ["Topless" cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Fashion or science?].

Authors:  K Markstaller; B Eberle; W F Dick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Load-distributing band improves ventilation and hemodynamics during resuscitation in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Jun-Yuan Wu; Chun-Sheng Li
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Katja Lah; Miljenko Križmarić; Stefek Grmec
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  A protease-activated receptor 1 antagonist protects against global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury after asphyxial cardiac arrest in rabbits.

Authors:  Jing-Ning Yang; Jun Chen; Min Xiao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Rethinking bystander CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Scott A Crane; Clifton W Callaway; Eric B Milbrandt; David T Huang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.