Literature DB >> 25726138

Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing.

Motoko Araki1, Tetsuya Ishii2.   

Abstract

Although genome-editing technologies facilitate efficient plant breeding without introducing a transgene, it is creating indistinct boundaries in the regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Rapid advances in plant breeding by genome-editing require the establishment of a new global policy for the new biotechnology, while filling the gap between process-based and product-based GMO regulations. In this Opinion article we review recent developments in producing major crops using genome-editing, and we propose a regulatory model that takes into account the various methodologies to achieve genetic modifications as well as the resulting types of mutation. Moreover, we discuss the future integration of genome-editing crops into society, specifically a possible response to the 'Right to Know' movement which demands labeling of food that contains genetically engineered ingredients.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  GMO; breeding; crops; genome editing; regulations; society

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25726138     DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Plant Sci        ISSN: 1360-1385            Impact factor:   18.313


  35 in total

1.  Genome-based establishment of a high-yielding heterotic pattern for hybrid wheat breeding.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Zuo Li; Guozheng Liu; Yong Jiang; Hans Peter Maurer; Tobias Würschum; Hans-Peter Mock; Andrea Matros; Erhard Ebmeyer; Ralf Schachschneider; Ebrahim Kazman; Johannes Schacht; Manje Gowda; C Friedrich H Longin; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A technological and regulatory outlook on CRISPR crop editing.

Authors:  Rea Globus; Udi Qimron
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 3.  CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding.

Authors:  Sukumar Biswas; Dabing Zhang; Jianxin Shi
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Motoko Araki
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 5.  Orthodox Seeds and Resurrection Plants: Two of a Kind?

Authors:  Maria-Cecília D Costa; Keren Cooper; Henk W M Hilhorst; Jill M Farrant
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 6.  Application and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in fruit crops.

Authors:  Junhui Zhou; Dongdong Li; Guoming Wang; Fuxi Wang; Merixia Kunjal; Dirk Joldersma; Zhongchi Liu
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 7.061

7.  Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Motoko Araki
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.570

8.  Lipofection-mediated genome editing using DNA-free delivery of the Cas9/gRNA ribonucleoprotein into plant cells.

Authors:  Wusheng Liu; Mary R Rudis; Matthew H Cheplick; Reginald J Millwood; Jian-Ping Yang; Christine A Ondzighi-Assoume; Garrett A Montgomery; Kellie P Burris; Mitra Mazarei; Jonathan D Chesnut; Charles Neal Stewart
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 9.  Genetically modified crop regulations: scope and opportunity using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approach.

Authors:  Shweta Gupta; Adarsh Kumar; Rupali Patel; Vinay Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 10.  Advances in application of genome editing in tomato and recent development of genome editing technology.

Authors:  Xuehan Xia; Xinhua Cheng; Rui Li; Juanni Yao; Zhengguo Li; Yulin Cheng
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.574

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.