Literature DB >> 25726119

Parasites and parasite management practices of organic and conventional dairy herds in Minnesota.

U S Sorge1, R D Moon2, B E Stromberg3, S L Schroth4, L Michels4, L J Wolff4, D F Kelton5, B J Heins6.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence and practices used to manage internal helminth parasites and external arthropod parasites on organic and conventional dairy herds in Minnesota. All organic (ORG) dairy herds in Minnesota (n=114) and a convenience sample of conventional herds were invited to participate in the study. Thirty-five ORG herds and 28 conventional herds were visited once in summer and fall of 2012. Conventional dairy herds were split into small conventional (SC,<200 cows) and medium-sized conventional herds (MC, ≥200 cows) so that SC herds were comparable in size to the ORG herds. Dairy managers were surveyed to assess their farm management practices and perceptions about parasites, hygiene scores were recorded for adult stock, and fecal samples were collected from a nominal 20 breeding-age heifers to characterize abundance of internal parasites. Nonparametric tests were used to compare fecal egg counts per gram (FEC) among farms grouped by management systems and practices. Organic farms had more designated pasture and were more likely to use rotational grazing compared with conventional farms, but the stocking densities of animals on pasture were similar among farm types. The overall FEC were very low, and only a few individual ORG heifers had FEC >500 eggs/gram. Samples from heifers on ORG farms had significantly more strongyle-type eggs than those on SC and MC farms (ORG: 6.6±2.1; SC: 0.5±0.3; MC: 0.8±0.7), but egg counts of other types of gastrointestinal parasites did not differ significantly among the 3 herd groups. Fly control measures were applied mainly to milking cows and preweaned calves and were used on 88.6% of ORG herds, 60.0% of SC herds, and 91.7% of MC herds. Approximately half of the producers reported having seen skin conditions suggestive of lice or tail mange in their cattle during the previous winter (ORG: 48.6%, SC: 57.1%, MC: 53.9%). Although most conventional producers reported treating these skin conditions, most organic producers stated they had not treated them. In conclusion, gastrointestinal parasite egg counts were low overall at the time of the survey, and most surveyed producers did not perceive gastrointestinal parasites to be a problem for their animals' health. Independent of the herd type, fly control was mostly targeted at the lactating herd and preweaned calves.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cattle; ectoparasite; flies; gastrointestinal parasite; organic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25726119     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of spatiotemporal patterns of historic natural Anthrax outbreaks in Minnesota and Kazakhstan.

Authors:  Kaushi S T Kanankege; Sarsenbay K Abdrakhmanov; Julio Alvarez; Linda Glaser; Jeffrey B Bender; Yersyn Y Mukhanbetkaliyev; Fedor I Korennoy; Ablaikhan S Kadyrov; Aruzhan S Abdrakhmanova; Andres M Perez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Animal Welfare and Parasite Infections in Organic and Conventional Dairy Farms: A Comparative Pilot Study in Central Italy.

Authors:  Matteo Chincarini; Lydia Lanzoni; Jorgelina Di Pasquale; Simone Morelli; Giorgio Vignola; Barbara Paoletti; Angela Di Cesare
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Prevalence of Anaplasma marginale in cattle blood samples collected from two important livestock regions in Punjab (Pakistan) with a note on epidemiology and phylogeny of parasite.

Authors:  Shahzadi Noor Ul Ain Zafar; Adil Khan; Sadaf Niaz; Munir Aktas; Sezayi Ozubek; Muhammad Farooq; Muhammad Moeen Adil; Zbigniew Zając; Furhan Iqbal; Ahmad R Alhimaidi; Ayman A Swelum
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Alternative Practices in Organic Dairy Production and Effects on Animal Behavior, Health, and Welfare.

Authors:  Hannah N Phillips; Bradley J Heins
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Survey of Management Practices and Farmers' Perceptions of Diseases on Organic Dairy Cattle Farms in California.

Authors:  Sejin Cheong; Juliette Di Francesco; Kyuyoung Lee; Richard Van Vleck Pereira; Randi Black; Betsy Karle; Melissa Lema; Alda F A Pires
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 6.  Historical Evolution of Cattle Management and Herd Health of Dairy Farms in OECD Countries.

Authors:  Ivo Medeiros; Aitor Fernandez-Novo; Susana Astiz; João Simões
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.