| Literature DB >> 35280590 |
Shahzadi Noor Ul Ain Zafar1, Adil Khan2, Sadaf Niaz3, Munir Aktas4, Sezayi Ozubek4, Muhammad Farooq5, Muhammad Moeen Adil5, Zbigniew Zając6, Furhan Iqbal1, Ahmad R Alhimaidi7, Ayman A Swelum8.
Abstract
Anaplasmosis, caused by intracellular gram-negative bacteria Anaplasma marginale is one of the most frequently reported tick-borne disease (TBDs) in tropical and sub-tropical countries, including Pakistan. In the present study, a total of 428 cattle blood samples were collected to examine the prevalence and phylogenetic origin of A. marginale in two important livestock regions of Punjab Province in Pakistan, i.e. Lodhran and Dera Ghazi Khan Districts. In addition, association between occurrence of A. marginale in cattle blood and selected epidemiological factors has been also investigated. The presence of A. marginale genetic material was confirmed in 9% of the tested blood samples taken from cattle in Lodhran and in 17% from Dera Ghazi Khan. Prevalence of A. marginale was significantly higher in cattle from Dera Ghazi Khan. All the cattle breeds from both districts were equally susceptible to A. marginale infection. We reported higher prevalence of A. marginale in cattle living indoors or with other dairy animals in Dera Ghazi Khan district. However, no such relationship was observed in the Lodhran district. Sequencing of the msp1b gene shows 96-99% similarity of A. marginale in the study area to those reported from other parts of Pakistan, South Africa, and Israel. We recommend that large scale tick and tick-borne disease control strategies must be implemented in both districts.Entities:
Keywords: Cattle; Molecular characterization; Pakistan; Punjab
Year: 2021 PMID: 35280590 PMCID: PMC8913547 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.11.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 2Map of Pakistan with highlighted Punjab Province and Lodhran and Dera Ghazi Khan districts. Map was generated in the Datawrapper 1.25 web tool (Datawrapper GmbH, ) and modified in GIMP 2.10 software (GIMP Development Team, ).
Comparison of A. marginale prevalence in blood samples of various cattle breeds collected from two Lodhran and Dera Ghazi Khan districts.
| Breed | Districts | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lohdran | Dera Ghazi Khan | |||||||
| Number of tested blood samples | p-value | Number of tested blood samples | p-value | |||||
| Cholistani | 87 | 8 (9%) | 79 (91%) | 0.60 | – | – | – | – |
| Sahiwal | 122 | 12 (10%) | 110 (90%) | 51 | 13 (25%) | 38 (75%) | 0.20 | |
| Crossbreed | 9 | 0 (0%) | 9 (100%) | 19 | 5 (26%) | 14 (74%) | ||
| Dajli | – | – | – | – | 57 | 6 (11%) | 51 (89%) | |
| Holstein Friesian | – | – | – | – | 37 | 5 (14%) | 32 (86%) | |
| Australian Ayrshire | – | – | – | – | 35 | 6 (17%) | 29 (83%) | |
| Jersey | – | – | – | – | 11 | 1 (9%) | 10 (91%) | |
| Total | 218 | 20 (9%) | 198 (90%) | 210 | 3 (17%) | 174 (83%) | ||
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree of A. marginale based on partial msp1bgen sequences from isolates taken from cattle blood samples in Pakistan and cattle worldwide, available in GenBank. Four new sequences of A. marginale obtained in the present study are represented in bold. Scale bar represents 0.2 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Association of A. marginale prevalence and epidemiological parameters from Lodhran and Dera Gahzi Khan districts. Based on age, 5 years old animals were considered young while older than 5 years were mature.
| Parameters | Districts | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lohdran | Dera Ghazi Khan | ||||||
| p-value | p-value | ||||||
| Gender | Male | 2 (8%) | 23 (92%) | 1.00 | 18 (24%) | 58 (76%) | 0.08 |
| Female | 18 (9%) | 175 (91%) | 18 (13%) | 116 (87%) | |||
| Age | >5 year | 12 (10%) | 106 (90%) | 0.6 | 25 (18%) | 112 (82%) | 0.7 |
| <5 year | 08 (9%) | 92 (92%) | 11 (15%) | 62 (85%) | |||
| Health status | Healthy | 20 (10%) | 189 (91%) | 1.00 | – | – | – |
| Fever | 0 (0%) | 09 (100 %) | – | – | – | ||
| Dogs presence | Present | 11 (9%) | 118 (90%) | 0.8 | 21 (14%) | 131 (86%) | 0.04 |
| Absent | 9 (10%) | 80 (90%) | 15 (26%) | 43 (74%) | |||
| Presence of feeding ticks | Present | 5 (10%) | 46 (90%) | 0.8 | 36 (18%) | 161(82%) | 0.1 |
| Absent | 15 (9%) | 152 (91%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (100%) | |||
| Living environment | Outdoor | – | – | – | 22 (14%) | 134 (86%) | 0.05 |
| Indoor | – | – | – | 14 (26%) | 40 (74%) | ||
| Presence of other dairy animals | Present | – | – | – | 28 (15%) | 158 (85%) | 0.03 |
| Absent | – | – | – | 8 (33%) | 16 (67%) | ||
| Water supply | Pump | – | – | – | 16 (19%) | 69 (81%) | 0.7 |
| Pool | – | – | – | 20(16%) | 105(84%) | ||