Yen N Truong1, Lynn M Yee2, Aaron B Caughey3, Yvonne W Cheng4. 1. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA. Electronic address: yen.truong@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu. 2. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR. 4. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine whether women who adhered to Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) had improved perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women with term singleton vertex births in the United States from 2011 through 2012. Women with medical or obstetric complications were excluded. Prepregnancy body mass index was calculated using reported weight and height. Women were categorized into 4 groups based on GWG and prepregnancy body mass index: (1) weight gain less than, (2) weight gain within, (3) weight gain 1-19 lb in excess of, and (4) weight gain ≥20 lb in excess of the IOM guidelines. The χ(2) test and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Compared to women who had GWG within the IOM guidelines, women with excessive weight gain, particularly ≥20 lb, were more likely to have adverse maternal outcomes (preeclampsia: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.82-2.93; eclampsia: aOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.27-2.78; cesarean: aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 2.14-2.19), blood transfusion (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.33), and neonatal outcomes (5-minute Apgar <4: aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.31; ventilation use >6 hours: aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.33; seizure: aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.24-1.89). Women who gained less than IOM guidelines had lower risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and obstetric interventions but were more likely to have small-for-gestational-age neonates (aOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.52-1.59). CONCLUSION: Women whose GWG is in excess of IOM guidelines have higher risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, particularly in women with ≥20 lb excess weight gain above guidelines while women who had weight gain below the IOM guidelines were less likely to have maternal morbidity but had higher odds of small for gestational age.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine whether women who adhered to Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) had improved perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women with term singleton vertex births in the United States from 2011 through 2012. Women with medical or obstetric complications were excluded. Prepregnancy body mass index was calculated using reported weight and height. Women were categorized into 4 groups based on GWG and prepregnancy body mass index: (1) weight gain less than, (2) weight gain within, (3) weight gain 1-19 lb in excess of, and (4) weight gain ≥20 lb in excess of the IOM guidelines. The χ(2) test and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Compared to women who had GWG within the IOM guidelines, women with excessive weight gain, particularly ≥20 lb, were more likely to have adverse maternal outcomes (preeclampsia: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.82-2.93; eclampsia: aOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.27-2.78; cesarean: aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 2.14-2.19), blood transfusion (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.33), and neonatal outcomes (5-minute Apgar <4: aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.31; ventilation use >6 hours: aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.33; seizure: aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.24-1.89). Women who gained less than IOM guidelines had lower risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and obstetric interventions but were more likely to have small-for-gestational-age neonates (aOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.52-1.59). CONCLUSION:Women whose GWG is in excess of IOM guidelines have higher risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, particularly in women with ≥20 lb excess weight gain above guidelines while women who had weight gain below the IOM guidelines were less likely to have maternal morbidity but had higher odds of small for gestational age.
Authors: Bat Zion Shachar; Jonathan A Mayo; Henry C Lee; Suzan L Carmichael; David K Stevenson; Gary M Shaw; Jeffery B Gould Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Neeta L Vora; Matthew R Grace; Lisa Smeester; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Rebecca C Fry; Victoria Bae-Jump; Kim Boggess Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Emily F Gregory; Matthew A Goldshore; Janice L Henderson; Robert D Weatherford; Nakiya N Showell Journal: Child Obes Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Delia Bogdanet; Mohamad Mustafa; Aftab Khattak; Paula M O' Shea; Fidelma P Dunne Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 5.095