Emily F Gregory1, Matthew A Goldshore2, Janice L Henderson3, Robert D Weatherford3, Nakiya N Showell1. 1. 1 General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD. 2. 2 Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD. 3. 3 Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity is widespread and treatment strategies have demonstrated limited success. Changes to obstetrical practice in response to obesity may support obesity prevention by influencing offspring growth trajectories. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined growth among infants born to obese mothers who participated in Nutrition in Pregnancy (NIP), a prenatal nutrition intervention at one urban hospital. NIP participants had Medicaid insurance and BMIs of 30 kg/m(2) or greater. We compared NIP infant growth to a historical control cohort, matched on maternal factors: age, race/ethnicity, prepregnancy BMI, parity, and history of prepregnancy hypertension or preterm birth. RESULTS: Growth data were available for 61 NIP and 145 control infants. Most mothers were African American (94%). Mean maternal BMI was 39.9 kg/m(2) (standard deviation [SD], 5.6) for NIP participants and 38.8 kg/m(2) (SD, 6.0) for controls. Pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, gestational diabetes, and birth weight, did not differ between groups. NIP participants were more likely to attend a postpartum visit (69% vs. 52%; p value, 0.03). At 1 year, 17% of NIP infants and 15% of controls had weight-for-length (WFL) ≥95th percentile (p value, 0.66). Other markers of accelerated infant growth, including crossing WFL percentiles and peak infant BMI, did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in growth between infants whose mothers participated in a prenatal nutrition intervention and those whose mothers did not. Existing prenatal programs for obese women may be inadequate to prevent pediatric obesity without pediatric collaboration to promote family-centered support beyond pregnancy.
BACKGROUND:Obesity is widespread and treatment strategies have demonstrated limited success. Changes to obstetrical practice in response to obesity may support obesity prevention by influencing offspring growth trajectories. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined growth among infants born to obese mothers who participated in Nutrition in Pregnancy (NIP), a prenatal nutrition intervention at one urban hospital. NIP participants had Medicaid insurance and BMIs of 30 kg/m(2) or greater. We compared NIP infant growth to a historical control cohort, matched on maternal factors: age, race/ethnicity, prepregnancy BMI, parity, and history of prepregnancy hypertension or preterm birth. RESULTS: Growth data were available for 61 NIP and 145 control infants. Most mothers were African American (94%). Mean maternal BMI was 39.9 kg/m(2) (standard deviation [SD], 5.6) for NIP participants and 38.8 kg/m(2) (SD, 6.0) for controls. Pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, gestational diabetes, and birth weight, did not differ between groups. NIP participants were more likely to attend a postpartum visit (69% vs. 52%; p value, 0.03). At 1 year, 17% of NIP infants and 15% of controls had weight-for-length (WFL) ≥95th percentile (p value, 0.66). Other markers of accelerated infant growth, including crossing WFL percentiles and peak infant BMI, did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in growth between infants whose mothers participated in a prenatal nutrition intervention and those whose mothers did not. Existing prenatal programs for obesewomen may be inadequate to prevent pediatric obesity without pediatric collaboration to promote family-centered support beyond pregnancy.
Authors: Elsie M Taveras; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Bettylou Sherry; Emily Oken; Jess Haines; Ken Kleinman; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Matthew W Gillman Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2011-11
Authors: Stefanie N Hinkle; Andrea J Sharma; Shin Y Kim; Sohyun Park; Karen Dalenius; Patricia L Brindley; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2012-10
Authors: Mette Tanvig; Christina A Vinter; Jan S Jørgensen; Sonja Wehberg; Per G Ovesen; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Henrik T Christesen; Dorte M Jensen Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Andrew C Tiu; Michael D Bishop; Laureano D Asico; Pedro A Jose; Van Anthony M Villar Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Chantel L Martin; Dereje Jima; Gemma C Sharp; Lauren E McCullough; Sarah S Park; Kymberly M Gowdy; David Skaar; Michael Cowley; Rachel L Maguire; Bernard Fuemmeler; David Collier; Caroline L Relton; Susan K Murphy; Cathrine Hoyo Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 4.861