Samuel Fanta1, Mari Kinnunen, Janne T Backman, Eija Kalso. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 705, FI-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland, samuel.fanta@helsinki.fi.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Low-dose ketamine is a lucrative therapeutic approach in cancer pain, perioperative treatment of pain, and management of treatment-resistant depression. The analgesic potency of its main metabolite norketamine is thought to be one third that of ketamine. However, few studies exist on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered S-ketamine. METHODS: In our study, 11 healthy volunteers received S-ketamine 0.25 mg/kg orally and 0.125 mg/kg intravenously. S-ketamine and norketamine concentrations were measured up to 23.5 h post-dose. A population pharmacokinetic model was built to describe S-ketamine and norketamine pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: A three-compartment model for both S-ketamine and norketamine best described the data. To accommodate for the extensive formation of norketamine after oral S-ketamine, a separate presystemic absorption-phase component was included in addition to its systemic formation. The oral bioavailability of S-ketamine was low, 8% (11% interindividual variability), and its clearance was high, 95 L/h/70 kg (13% interindividual variability). Simulations suggested that after oral dosing, norketamine AUC at steady state is 16.5 times higher than that of S-ketamine. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the analgesic effect of S-ketamine is due to both S-ketamine and norketamine, relatively small oral doses of S-ketamine can be assumed to be a feasible alternative to repeated intravenous dosing, for example in the setting of chronic pain.
PURPOSE: Low-dose ketamine is a lucrative therapeutic approach in cancer pain, perioperative treatment of pain, and management of treatment-resistant depression. The analgesic potency of its main metabolite norketamine is thought to be one third that of ketamine. However, few studies exist on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered S-ketamine. METHODS: In our study, 11 healthy volunteers received S-ketamine 0.25 mg/kg orally and 0.125 mg/kg intravenously. S-ketamine and norketamine concentrations were measured up to 23.5 h post-dose. A population pharmacokinetic model was built to describe S-ketamine and norketamine pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: A three-compartment model for both S-ketamine and norketamine best described the data. To accommodate for the extensive formation of norketamine after oral S-ketamine, a separate presystemic absorption-phase component was included in addition to its systemic formation. The oral bioavailability of S-ketamine was low, 8% (11% interindividual variability), and its clearance was high, 95 L/h/70 kg (13% interindividual variability). Simulations suggested that after oral dosing, norketamine AUC at steady state is 16.5 times higher than that of S-ketamine. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the analgesic effect of S-ketamine is due to both S-ketamine and norketamine, relatively small oral doses of S-ketamine can be assumed to be a feasible alternative to repeated intravenous dosing, for example in the setting of chronic pain.
Authors: Katharine E J Brunette; Brian J Anderson; Jennifer Thomas; Lubbe Wiesner; David W Herd; Simone Schulein Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 2.556
Authors: P Molero; J A Ramos-Quiroga; R Martin-Santos; E Calvo-Sánchez; L Gutiérrez-Rojas; J J Meana Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Panos Zanos; Ruin Moaddel; Patrick J Morris; Lace M Riggs; Jaclyn N Highland; Polymnia Georgiou; Edna F R Pereira; Edson X Albuquerque; Craig J Thomas; Carlos A Zarate; Todd D Gould Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Jennifer Swainson; Alexander McGirr; Pierre Blier; Elisa Brietzke; Stéphane Richard-Devantoy; Nisha Ravindran; Jean Blier; Serge Beaulieu; Benicio N Frey; Sidney H Kennedy; Roger S McIntyre; Roumen V Milev; Sagar V Parikh; Ayal Schaffer; Valerie H Taylor; Valérie Tourjman; Michael van Ameringen; Lakshmi N Yatham; Arun V Ravindran; Raymond W Lam Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 4.356