Jennifer Swainson1, Alexander McGirr2, Pierre Blier3, Elisa Brietzke4, Stéphane Richard-Devantoy5, Nisha Ravindran6, Jean Blier7, Serge Beaulieu5, Benicio N Frey8, Sidney H Kennedy6, Roger S McIntyre6, Roumen V Milev4, Sagar V Parikh9, Ayal Schaffer6, Valerie H Taylor2, Valérie Tourjman10, Michael van Ameringen8, Lakshmi N Yatham11, Arun V Ravindran6, Raymond W Lam11. 1. Department of Psychiatry, 12357University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. Department of Psychiatry, 70401University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Department of Psychiatry, 12365University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Psychiatry, 104820Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Psychiatry, 12367McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 6. Department of Psychiatry, 12366University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 12365University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 8. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, 62703McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 9. Department of Psychiatry, 12266University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 10. Department of Psychiatry, 12368Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada. 11. Department of Psychiatry, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients with major depressive disorder often have limited response to first-line and second-line medications; hence, novel pharmacological treatments are needed for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Ketamine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, has demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in patients with TRD. The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) convened a task force to review the evidence for efficacy and safety of racemic ketamine and to provide recommendations for its use in clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted with computerized search of electronic databases up to January 31, 2020 using combinations of search terms, inspection of bibliographies, and review of other ketamine guidelines and consensus statements. The level of evidence and lines of treatment were assigned according to CANMAT criteria. Recommendations were given in question-answer format. RESULTS: Intravenous (IV) racemic ketamine given as a single infusion has Level 1 evidence for efficacy in adults with TRD. The evidence for multiple infusions, given as an acute series or as ongoing maintenance treatment, is limited to Level 3. Adverse events associated with ketamine infusions include behavioral (e.g., dissociative symptoms) and physiological (e.g., hypertension) events. There is only Level 3 or 4 evidence for non-IV formulations of racemic ketamine. Consensus recommendations are given for clinical administration of IV ketamine including patient selection, facility and personnel issues, monitoring, and maintaining response. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose IV racemic ketamine is a third-line recommendation for adults with TRD. The need for repeated and maintenance ketamine infusions should be carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis with consideration of potential risks and benefits. Because of limited evidence for efficacy and risk for misuse and diversion, the use of oral and other formulations of racemic ketamine should be limited to specialists with ketamine-prescribing expertise and affiliations with tertiary or specialized centers.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with major depressive disorder often have limited response to first-line and second-line medications; hence, novel pharmacological treatments are needed for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Ketamine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, has demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in patients with TRD. The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) convened a task force to review the evidence for efficacy and safety of racemic ketamine and to provide recommendations for its use in clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted with computerized search of electronic databases up to January 31, 2020 using combinations of search terms, inspection of bibliographies, and review of other ketamine guidelines and consensus statements. The level of evidence and lines of treatment were assigned according to CANMAT criteria. Recommendations were given in question-answer format. RESULTS: Intravenous (IV) racemic ketamine given as a single infusion has Level 1 evidence for efficacy in adults with TRD. The evidence for multiple infusions, given as an acute series or as ongoing maintenance treatment, is limited to Level 3. Adverse events associated with ketamine infusions include behavioral (e.g., dissociative symptoms) and physiological (e.g., hypertension) events. There is only Level 3 or 4 evidence for non-IV formulations of racemic ketamine. Consensus recommendations are given for clinical administration of IV ketamine including patient selection, facility and personnel issues, monitoring, and maintaining response. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose IV racemic ketamine is a third-line recommendation for adults with TRD. The need for repeated and maintenance ketamine infusions should be carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis with consideration of potential risks and benefits. Because of limited evidence for efficacy and risk for misuse and diversion, the use of oral and other formulations of racemic ketamine should be limited to specialists with ketamine-prescribing expertise and affiliations with tertiary or specialized centers.
Authors: Paul A James; Suzanne Oparil; Barry L Carter; William C Cushman; Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb; Joel Handler; Daniel T Lackland; Michael L LeFevre; Thomas D MacKenzie; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Sandra J Taler; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson T Wright; Andrew S Narva; Eduardo Ortiz Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Amie C Hayley; Maja Green; Luke A Downey; Con K K Stough; Michael Keane; Brook Shiferaw; Panagiota Kostakis; Yahya Shehabi Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Jennifer L Vande Voort; Robert J Morgan; Simon Kung; Keith G Rasmussen; Jose Rico; Brian A Palmer; Kathryn M Schak; Susannah J Tye; Matthew J Ritter; Mark A Frye; William V Bobo Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Anita E Autry; Megumi Adachi; Elena Nosyreva; Elisa S Na; Maarten F Los; Peng-fei Cheng; Ege T Kavalali; Lisa M Monteggia Journal: Nature Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jennifer L Phillips; Natalia Jaworska; Elizabeth Kamler; Venkat Bhat; Jean Blier; Jane A Foster; Stefanie Hassel; Keith Ho; Lisa McMurray; Roumen Milev; Zahra Moazamigoudarzi; Franca M Placenza; Stéphane Richard-Devantoy; Susan Rotzinger; Gustavo Turecki; Gustavo H Vazquez; Sidney H Kennedy; Pierre Blier Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Sagar V Parikh; Daniela Lopez; Jennifer L Vande Voort; Jose Rico; Eric Achtyes; William Coryell; Andrew Goddard; Fernando Goes; John F Greden; Balwinder Singh; Adam Kaplin; Mark A Frye; Daniel Maixner; Brendon Watson; Karina Drake; Vijay Tarnal; Patricio Riva-Posse; William V Bobo Journal: Psychopharmacol Bull Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Jennifer Swainson; Larry J Klassen; Stefan Brennan; Pratap Chokka; Martin A Katzman; Robert L Tanguay; Atul Khullar Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Felicia Ceban; Joshua D Rosenblat; Kevin Kratiuk; Yena Lee; Nelson B Rodrigues; Hartej Gill; Mehala Subramaniapillai; Flora Nasri; Leanna M W Lui; Orly Lipsitz; Anil Kumar; Jung Goo Lee; Edmond H Chau; Bing Cao; Kangguang Lin; Roger C Ho; Rodrigo B Mansur; Jennifer Swainson; Roger S McIntyre Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2021-08-07 Impact factor: 5.749