Literature DB >> 25724181

In stage II/III lymph node-positive breast cancer patients less than 55 years of age, keratin 8 expression in lymph node metastases but not in the primary tumour is an indicator of better survival.

Serena Bonin1, Danae Pracella, Renzo Barbazza, Sandro Sulfaro, Giorgio Stanta.   

Abstract

Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic variables for breast cancer (BC). To investigate and understand the clinical, histopathological and biological factors that affect prognosis in node-positive young breast cancer patients, we compared the phenotype of 100 primary tumours with their corresponding loco-regional lymph node (LN) metastases using conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers currently in use for molecular classification of breast cancer. By comparing the expression of ER, PR, HER-2, Ki67, K8, K5/6 and vimentin, we found that expression of HER-2, Ki67, K8 and vimentin is frequently lost in lymph node metastases. Between the primary tumour and corresponding lymph node metastases, expression of keratins K8 and K5/6 significantly changed. Expression of K8 in lymph node metastases, but not in primary tumours, segregates patients in two sub-groups with different outcomes. Survival of patients with K8-positive LN metastases at 5 years in comparison with patients with K8-negative LN metastases was 75 vs 48 %, at 10 years 62 vs 22 % and at 20 years 53 vs 14 % (p < 0.001). K8 immunostaining of tissue from the lymph node metastasis allows defining a sub-group of lymph node-positive BC patients with a highly unfavourable outcome, for whom therapeutic options might have to be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25724181     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1748-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  52 in total

1.  Differential expression of cytokeratin mRNA and protein in normal prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Yang; J Hao; X Liu; B Dalkin; R B Nagle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Does analysis of biomarkers in tumor cells in lymph node metastases give additional prognostic information in primary breast cancer?

Authors:  Anna-Karin Falck; Mårten Fernö; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Lisa Rydén
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Tracking the seed and tending the soil: evolving concepts in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Comen
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.970

4.  Evaluation of ER, PgR, HER-2, Ki-67, cyclin D1, and nm23-H1 as predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Xi-ru Li; Mei Liu; Yan-jun Zhang; Jian-dong Wang; Yi-qiong Zheng; Jie Li; Bing Ma; Xin Song
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction.

Authors:  Jorge S Reis-Filho; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Cytokeratin 5/6, c-Met expressions, and PTEN loss prognostic indicators in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Mevlude Inanc; Metin Ozkan; Halit Karaca; Veli Berk; Oktay Bozkurt; Ayse Ocak Duran; Ersin Ozaslan; Hulya Akgun; Fatos Tekelioglu; Ferhan Elmali
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Frequent genetic differences between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer provide an approach to identification of biomarkers for disease progression.

Authors:  Andrzej B Popławski; Michał Jankowski; Stephen W Erickson; Teresita Díaz de Ståhl; E Christopher Partridge; Chiquito Crasto; Jingyu Guo; John Gibson; Uwe Menzel; Carl Eg Bruder; Aneta Kaczmarczyk; Magdalena Benetkiewicz; Robin Andersson; Johanna Sandgren; Barbara Zegarska; Dariusz Bała; Ewa Srutek; David B Allison; Arkadiusz Piotrowski; Wojciech Zegarski; Jan P Dumanski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Breast cancer in young women: have the prognostic implications of breast cancer subtypes changed over time?

Authors:  Wilson Sheridan; Tyldesley Scott; Speers Caroline; Zheng Yvonne; Bernstein Vanessa; Voduc David; Gelmon Karen; Chia Stephen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Does vimentin help to delineate the so-called 'basal type breast cancer'?

Authors:  Renata U Kusinska; Radzislaw Kordek; Elzbieta Pluciennik; Andrzej K Bednarek; Janusz H Piekarski; Piotr Potemski
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-20

10.  Expression of epithelial to mesenchymal transition-related markers in lymph node metastases as a surrogate for primary tumor metastatic potential in breast cancer.

Authors:  Aleksandra Markiewicz; Tomasz Ahrends; Marzena Wełnicka-Jaśkiewicz; Barbara Seroczyńska; Jarosław Skokowski; Janusz Jaśkiewicz; Jolanta Szade; Wojciech Biernat; Anna J Zaczek
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Tumour heterogeneity: principles and practical consequences.

Authors:  Giorgio Stanta; Stephan Wenzel Jahn; Serena Bonin; Gerald Hoefler
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Overview on Clinical Relevance of Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Giorgio Stanta; Serena Bonin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-04-06

3.  Histone deacetylase 6 expression in metastatic lymph nodes is a valuable prognostic marker for resected node-positive esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Xuan Xie; Kongjia Luo; Yi Li; Yihong Ling; Shuishen Zhang; Xiuying Xie; Jing Wen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.989

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.