BACKGROUND: Prognostic and treatment-predictive biomarkers in primary breast cancer are routinely analyzed in the primary tumor, whereas metastatic tumor cells in lymph node metastases are not characterized. The present study aimed to define the concordance between biomarkers in matched pairs of breast cancers and lymph node metastases and to relate their expression to clinical outcome. METHODS: Patients with primary breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen for 2 years were included. A tissue microarray of primary tumors and lymph node metastases was constructed, and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 were analyzed immunohistochemically in 262, 257, 104, and 101 patients, respectively. Five years' distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was used as the primary end point. RESULTS: The concordance for biomarker expression in primary tumors and corresponding lymph node metastases was 93% for ER, 84% for PR, 97% for HER2, and 85% for Ki67. The discordant cases for HER2 status were all negative in the tumor but positive in the node. ER positivity was a significant independent predictor of improved 5-year DDFS when analyzed in the primary tumor as well as in the lymph node metastases. Ki67 positivity analyzed in both locations correlated with shortened DDFS. HER2 positivity at both locations was an indicator of early relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance for the biomarkers analyzed in matched pairs of primary tumors and lymph node metastases was high. Moreover, survival analyses showed that the expression of biomarkers in lymph node metastases can provide prognostic information when no analyses of the primary tumor can be done. Treatment selection based on biomarkers in the lymph node is a topic for further studies.
BACKGROUND: Prognostic and treatment-predictive biomarkers in primary breast cancer are routinely analyzed in the primary tumor, whereas metastatic tumor cells in lymph node metastases are not characterized. The present study aimed to define the concordance between biomarkers in matched pairs of breast cancers and lymph node metastases and to relate their expression to clinical outcome. METHODS:Patients with primary breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen for 2 years were included. A tissue microarray of primary tumors and lymph node metastases was constructed, and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 were analyzed immunohistochemically in 262, 257, 104, and 101 patients, respectively. Five years' distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was used as the primary end point. RESULTS: The concordance for biomarker expression in primary tumors and corresponding lymph node metastases was 93% for ER, 84% for PR, 97% for HER2, and 85% for Ki67. The discordant cases for HER2 status were all negative in the tumor but positive in the node. ER positivity was a significant independent predictor of improved 5-year DDFS when analyzed in the primary tumor as well as in the lymph node metastases. Ki67 positivity analyzed in both locations correlated with shortened DDFS. HER2 positivity at both locations was an indicator of early relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance for the biomarkers analyzed in matched pairs of primary tumors and lymph node metastases was high. Moreover, survival analyses showed that the expression of biomarkers in lymph node metastases can provide prognostic information when no analyses of the primary tumor can be done. Treatment selection based on biomarkers in the lymph node is a topic for further studies.
Authors: F Cardoso; A Di Leo; D Larsimont; D Gancberg; G Rouas; S Dolci; F Ferreira; M Paesmans; M Piccart Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Marion Procter; Brian Leyland-Jones; Aron Goldhirsch; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Richard Bell; Christian Jackisch; David Cameron; Mitch Dowsett; Carlos H Barrios; Günther Steger; Chiun-Shen Huang; Michael Andersson; Moshe Inbar; Mikhail Lichinitser; István Láng; Ulrike Nitz; Hiroji Iwata; Christoph Thomssen; Caroline Lohrisch; Thomas M Suter; Josef Rüschoff; Tamás Suto; Victoria Greatorex; Carol Ward; Carolyn Straehle; Eleanor McFadden; M Stella Dolci; Richard D Gelber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Britta Weigelt; Annuska M Glas; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Anke T Witteveen; Johannes L Peterse; Laura J van't Veer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-12-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gabriella Honeth; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Markus Ringnér; Lao H Saal; Sofia K Gruvberger-Saal; Kristina Lövgren; Dorthe Grabau; Mårten Fernö; Ake Borg; Cecilia Hegardt Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: André Filipe Vieira; Maria Rita Dionísio; Madalena Gomes; Jorge F Cameselle-Teijeiro; Manuela Lacerda; Isabel Amendoeira; Fernando Schmitt; Joana Paredes Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Vassiliki Kotoula; Konstantine T Kalogeras; George Kouvatseas; Despoina Televantou; Ralf Kronenwett; Ralph M Wirtz; George Fountzilas Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Aleksandra Markiewicz; Tomasz Ahrends; Marzena Wełnicka-Jaśkiewicz; Barbara Seroczyńska; Jarosław Skokowski; Janusz Jaśkiewicz; Jolanta Szade; Wojciech Biernat; Anna J Zaczek Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 5.531