Literature DB >> 25724062

Volumetric changes in cranial vault expansion: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis.

Christopher A Derderian1, Jason D Wink, Jennifer L McGrath, Amy Collinsworth, Scott P Bartlett, Jesse A Taylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis has recently been introduced to treat patients with multisuture syndromic craniosynostosis and is believed to provide greater gains in intracranial volume. This study provides volumetric analysis to determine the gains in intracranial volume produced by this modality.
METHODS: This was a two-center retrospective study of preprocedure and postprocedure computed tomography scans of two groups of 15 patients each with syndromic multisuture craniosynostosis treated with either fronto-orbital advancement or posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Scan data were analyzed volumetrically with Mimics software. Volumetric gains attributable to growth between scans were controlled for.
RESULTS: The mean advancements were 12.5 mm for fronto-orbital advancement and 24.8 mm for distraction osteogenesis. The mean difference in volume between the preoperative and postoperative scans was 144 cm(3) for fronto-orbital advancement and 274 cm(3) for (p = 0.009). After controlling for growth, the corrected mean volume difference was 66 cm(3) for fronto-orbital advancement and 142 cm(3) for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.0017). The corrected mean volume difference per millimeter of advancement was 4.6 cm(3) for fronto-orbital advancement and 5.8 cm(3) for distraction (p = 0.357).
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis provided statistically greater intracranial volume expansion than fronto-orbital advancement. The volume gains per millimeter advancement were similar between groups, with a trend toward greater gains per millimeter with distraction osteogenesis. Gradual expansion of the overlying soft tissues with posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis appears to be the primary mechanism for greater volume gains with this technique. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25724062     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  20 in total

1.  Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in the immunocompromised patient.

Authors:  John S Sullivan; Alicia E Snider; Jeffrey Farrington; J Mason Shiflett; Kristin J Weaver; Laura S Humphries; Ian C Hoppe
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Posterior cranial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher A Derderian; Nicholas Bastidas; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Ventricular shunt complications in patients undergoing posterior vault distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Anthony Azzolini; Katie Magoon; Robin Yang; Scott Bartlett; Jordan Swanson; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Wire fixation of internal distractor for cranial vault remodeling.

Authors:  Federico Di Rocco; Alexandru Szathmari; Carmine Mottolese
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Syndrome-related outcomes following posterior vault distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral; Yuri Moresco de Oliveira; Rafael Denadai; Cesar Augusto Raposo-Amaral; Enrico Ghizoni
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sameer Pandey; Gosla S Reddy; Ashi Chug; Ashutosh Dixit
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-09-16

7.  Expansion and compression distraction osteogenesis based on volumetric and neurodevelopmental analysis in sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Myung Chul Lee; Kyu Won Shim; Eun Kyung Park; In Sik Yun; Dong Seok Kim; Yong Oock Kim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Early Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis for the Treatment of Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Dana Johns; Erin Anstadt; Daniel Donato; John Kestle; Jay Riva-Cambrin; Faizi Siddiqi; Barbu Gociman
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 9.  Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Complexities of Clinical Care.

Authors:  Justine O'Hara; Federica Ruggiero; Louise Wilson; Greg James; Graeme Glass; Owase Jeelani; Juling Ong; Richard Bowman; Michelle Wyatt; Robert Evans; Martin Samuels; Richard Hayward; David J Dunaway
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2019-01-16

10.  Severe craniolacunae and upper and lower extremity anomalies resulting from Crouzon syndrome, FGFR2 mutation, and Ser347Cys variant.

Authors:  Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral; Yuri Moresco Oliveira; Rafael Denadai; Cesar Augusto Raposo-Amaral; Enrico Ghizoni
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.