Literature DB >> 33970330

Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in the immunocompromised patient.

John S Sullivan1, Alicia E Snider2, Jeffrey Farrington3, J Mason Shiflett4, Kristin J Weaver4, Laura S Humphries1, Ian C Hoppe5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The treatment of patients with multisuture craniosynostosis is complex and patient-dependent. Cranial distraction osteogenesis is a relatively new procedure for treatment of these patients, with its use increasing in many centers. With this increased use comes an expanding range of indications. Surgical management of multisuture craniosynostosis in therapeutically immunosuppressed patients following a solid organ transplant presents unique challenges. We describe our experience with posterior cranial vault distraction in two patients with multisuture craniosynostosis that had previously undergone organ transplantation.
METHODS: Two solid-organ transplant recipient patients with multisuture craniosynostosis were identified. A detailed examination of their medical/transplant history and perioperative details were recorded.
RESULTS: The first patient was a 3-year-old girl who received a kidney transplantation in infancy and subsequently presented with a symptomatic Chiari malformation and papilledema. Imaging revealed pansynostosis. She underwent posterior cranial vault distraction extending into a Chiari decompression. Her postoperative course was complicated by distractor site infection at the beginning of consolidation, necessitating early removal of distractors. The second patient was a 2-year-old boy who received a heart transplantation at the age of 3 months and subsequently presented with head shape concerns. Imaging revealed bicoronal and sagittal craniosynostosis. He underwent a posterior cranial vault distraction without complication. Following removal of the distractors, he developed an infection at one of the distractor sites with associated fever and leukocytosis, necessitating washout and drain placement. Both patients achieved successful cranial vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis and at a 2-year follow-up do not have evidence of elevated intracranial pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive therapy has the potential to inhibit wound healing and place patients at risk for wound infection. Although we have demonstrated successful cranial vault expansion with distraction in two immunosuppressed children, extra care must be taken with these patients when placing semi-buried hardware. Specifically, prompt identification and proactive management of potential infectious complications is critical to applying this technique safely in these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniosynostosis; Distraction osteogenesis; Immunosuppression

Year:  2021        PMID: 33970330     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05202-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  15 in total

1.  Volumetric changes in cranial vault expansion: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher A Derderian; Jason D Wink; Jennifer L McGrath; Amy Collinsworth; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Posterior calvarial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Nicholas White; Martin Evans; M Stephen Dover; Peter Noons; Guirish Solanki; Hiroshi Nishikawa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Posterior cranial vault expansion in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Comparison of current techniques.

Authors:  Daniel Nowinski; Federico Di Rocco; Dominique Renier; Christian SainteRose; Junnu Leikola; Eric Arnaud
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  What's New in Syndromic Craniosynostosis Surgery?

Authors:  Jesse A Taylor; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Open cranial vault remodeling: the evolving role of distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher A Derderian; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  A craniometric analysis of posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Jesse A Goldstein; J Thomas Paliga; Jason D Wink; David W Low; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Onset and Resolution of Chiari Malformations and Hydrocephalus in Syndromic Craniosynostosis following Posterior Vault Distraction.

Authors:  Lawrence O Lin; Rosaline S Zhang; Ian C Hoppe; J Thomas Paliga; Jordan W Swanson; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis.

Authors:  D Renier; C Sainte-Rose; D Marchac; J F Hirsch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis in Nonsyndromic Patients: An Evaluation of Indications and Safety.

Authors:  Rosaline S Zhang; Ari M Wes; Sanjay Naran; Ian C Hoppe; James Sun; Daniel Mazzaferro; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  A Perioperative Risk Comparison of Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis in an Older Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Jing Li; Patrick A Gerety; Wen Xu; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.