Literature DB >> 26231567

Expansion and compression distraction osteogenesis based on volumetric and neurodevelopmental analysis in sagittal craniosynostosis.

Myung Chul Lee1, Kyu Won Shim2, Eun Kyung Park2, In Sik Yun3, Dong Seok Kim2, Yong Oock Kim4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a less daunting procedure than extensive cranial vault remodeling and has been used to correct sagittal craniosynostosis. The purposes of this study are to describe DO in combination with expansion and compression procedures and to report analytic results based on the cranial index (CI), volumetric measurement, and neurodevelopmental tests.
METHODS: Between June 2002 and May 2013, 32 patients with non-syndromic sagittal synostosis who had undergone antero-posterior compression with bitemporal expansion were recruited. Circumferential baseline, mid-sagittal, and bicoronal craniotomies were performed in addition to four-quadrant bone flap procedures via distraction with dural attachment. CI, intracranial volume (ICV), head circumference (HC), and neurodevelopmental outcomes using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II) scoring system were analyzed.
RESULTS: Dolichocephalic CI (68.85 ± 3.61) was altered to mesocephalic CI (78.28 ± 3.74) postoperatively. Preoperative ICV and HC determinations were within the normal range for the majority of participants (normal ICV 87.5%, n = 28; normal HC 75%, n = 24). ICV and HC did not show significant changes with postoperative measurements and were maintained within normal ranges. Regarding neurodevelopment, both the mental and psychomotor developmental indices (MDI, PDI) demonstrated significant improvement (MDI, 88.69 ± 17.38 to 96.23 ± 21.05; PDI, 91.38 ± 16.31 to 100 ± 11.51; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Symmetric sagittal synostosis can be treated comprehensively through DO in combination with expansion and compression procedures. ICV and HC measurements were useful for designing surgical and postoperative distraction strategies. Achievement of mesocephalic CI and neurodevelopmental improvement validated morphological and functional effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranial index; Distraction osteogenesis; Head circumference; Intracranial volume; Neurodevelopment; Sagittal craniosynostosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26231567     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-015-2843-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  33 in total

1.  Volumetric changes in cranial vault expansion: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher A Derderian; Jason D Wink; Jennifer L McGrath; Amy Collinsworth; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Mini-invasive surgical technique for sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Luca Massimi; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Neurodevelopmental functioning of infants with untreated single-suture craniosynostosis during early infancy.

Authors:  Annette C Da Costa; Vicki A Anderson; Ravi Savarirayan; Jacquie A Wrennall; David K Chong; Anthony D Holmes; Andrew L Greensmith; John G Meara
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Distraction vs remodeling surgery for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Seong-Woong Kim; Kyu-Won Shim; Nick Plesnila; Yong-Oock Kim; Joong-Uhn Choi; Dong-Seok Kim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  The occipitofrontal circumference: reliable prediction of the intracranial volume in children with syndromic and complex craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Bianca Francisca Maria Rijken; Bianca Kelly den Ottelander; Marie-Lise Charlotte van Veelen; Maarten Hans Lequin; Irene Margreet Jacqueline Mathijssen
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  CT-determined intracranial volume for a normal population.

Authors:  A H Abbott; D J Netherway; D B Niemann; B Clark; M Yamamoto; J Cole; A Hanieh; M H Moore; D J David
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Lumbar puncture opening pressure is not a reliable measure of intracranial pressure in children.

Authors:  Cathy Cartwright; Usiakimi Igbaseimokumo
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Dynamic total skull remodeling by a combination of morcellation craniotomy with distraction osteogenesis: the MoD procedure.

Authors:  Hideo Nakajima; Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Ikkei Tamada; Hirotoshi Ohara; Kazuo Kishi
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Sagittal synostosis: quantitative assessment of presenting deformity and surgical results based on CT scans.

Authors:  J C Posnick; K Y Lin; P Chen; D Armstrong
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Sagittal synostosis: a review of 53 cases of sagittal suturectomy in one unit.

Authors:  Dylan J Murray; Michael O Kelleher; A McGillivary; David Allcutt; Michael J Earley
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sagittal Synostosis and Its Association With Cognitive, Behavioral, and Psychological Functioning: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amanda J Osborn; Rachel M Roberts; Diana S Dorstyn; Ben G Grave; David J David
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01

Review 2.  Distraction Osteogenesis Update: Introduction of Multidirectional Cranial Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Akira Gomi; Ataru Sunaga; Hideaki Kamochi; Hirofumi Oguma; Yasushi Sugawara
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-05-10

Review 3.  Neurodevelopmental Problems in Non-Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Kyu-Won Shim; Eun-Kyung Park; Ju-Seong Kim; Yong-Oock Kim; Dong-Seok Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-05-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.