Literature DB >> 25723685

Neovascularisation is not an innocent bystander in recurrence after great saphenous vein surgery.

C R R Corbett1, V Prakash.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to establish the causes of failure of great saphenous vein surgery among patients in whom there was confidence that accurate saphenofemoral ligation had been carried and the great saphenous vein had been stripped at least to knee level.
METHODS: This was an observational study of 100 limbs (66 patients) operated on by a single surgeon 5-22 years previously (mean: 12 years). The index operation was primary in 54 limbs and for recurrence in 46 limbs. Thirty-two patients were studied having been re-referred for recurrence while 34 were recalled for review. All were examined clinically and with duplex ultrasonography, and all completed questionnaires (Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire [AVVQ] and EQ-5D-3L). In order to measure the extent of visible recurrence, a scoring system similar to that in the venous clinical severity score was used but with a range of 0-8.
RESULTS: There were visible varicosities in 77 of the 100 limbs. Duplex ultrasonography showed that recurrent saphenofemoral incompetence (SFI) was present in 27% of the limbs. This was judged to result from neovascularisation and was the most common source of reflux. AVVQ scores for the 27 limbs with recurrent SFI (median: 34, interquartile range [IQR]: 20-42) were higher than for the 73 with no recurrent SFI (median: 17, IQR: 11-29), which was a significant difference (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.01). Analysing clinical scores with chi-squared tests indicated fewer visible varicosities in limbs without recurrent SFI than in those with recurrent SFI (p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Neovascularisation remains poorly understood but it cannot be considered an innocent bystander.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25723685      PMCID: PMC4473385          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X14055925061199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  24 in total

1.  Venous severity scoring: An adjunct to venous outcome assessment.

Authors:  R B Rutherford; F T Padberg; A J Comerota; R L Kistner; M H Meissner; G L Moneta
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Varicose veins: a critical review of the definition and the therapeutical options.

Authors:  C Jeanneret; K Karatolios
Journal:  Vasa       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 3.  Pathogenesis and etiology of recurrent varicose veins.

Authors:  Maresa Brake; Chung S Lim; Amanda C Shepherd; Joseph Shalhoub; Alun H Davies
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Recurrent varicose veins: correlation between preoperative clinical and hand-held Doppler ultrasonographic examination, and anatomical findings at surgery.

Authors:  A W Bradbury; P A Stonebridge; C V Ruckley; I Beggs
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction reflux after ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein.

Authors:  R Fischer; N Linde; C Duff; C Jeanneret; J G Chandler; P Seeber
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum.

Authors:  Peter Gloviczki; Anthony J Comerota; Michael C Dalsing; Bo G Eklof; David L Gillespie; Monika L Gloviczki; Joann M Lohr; Robert B McLafferty; Mark H Meissner; M Hassan Murad; Frank T Padberg; Peter J Pappas; Marc A Passman; Joseph D Raffetto; Michael A Vasquez; Thomas W Wakefield
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins.

Authors:  A M Garratt; L M Macdonald; D A Ruta; I T Russell; J K Buckingham; Z H Krukowski
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-03

8.  Causes of varicose vein recurrence: late results of a randomized controlled trial of stripping the long saphenous vein.

Authors:  Rebecca J Winterborn; Chris Foy; Jonothan J Earnshaw
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Presentation of the patient with recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS).

Authors:  Michel R Perrin; Nicos Labropoulos; Luis R Leon
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 10.  Superficial venous insufficiency from the infernal to the endothermal.

Authors:  D Carradice
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.