Literature DB >> 10842165

Venous severity scoring: An adjunct to venous outcome assessment.

R B Rutherford1, F T Padberg, A J Comerota, R L Kistner, M H Meissner, G L Moneta.   

Abstract

Some measure of disease severity is needed to properly compare the outcomes of the various approaches to the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Comparing the outcomes of two or more different treatments in a clinical trial, or the same treatment in two or more reports from the literature cannot be done with confidence unless the relative severity of the venous disease in each treatment group is known. The CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic) system is an excellent classification scheme, but it cannot serve the purpose of venous severity scoring because many of its components are relatively static and others use detailed alphabetical designations. A disease severity scoring scheme needs to be quantifiable, with gradable elements that can change in response to treatment. However, an American Venous Forum committee on venous outcomes assessment has developed a venous severity scoring system based on the best usable elements of the CEAP system. Two scores are proposed. The first is a Venous Clinical Severity Score: nine clinical characteristics of chronic venous disease are graded from 0 to 3 (absent, mild, moderate, severe) with specific criteria to avoid overlap or arbitrary scoring. Zero to three points are added for differences in background conservative therapy (compression and elevation) to produce a 30 point-maximum flat scale. The second is a Venous Segmental Disease Score, which combines the Anatomic and Pathophysiologic components of CEAP. Major venous segments are graded according to presence of reflux and/or obstruction. It is entirely based on venous imaging, primarily duplex scan but also phlebographic findings. This scoring scheme weights 11 venous segments for their relative importance when involved with reflux and/or obstruction, with a maximum score of 10. A third score is simply a modification of the existing CEAP disability score that eliminates reference to work and an 8-hour working day, substituting instead the patient's prior normal activities. These new scoring schemes are intended to complement the current CEAP system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10842165     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2000.107094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  71 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis and treatment of varicose veins. Part 1: definition, epidemiology, etiology, classification, clinical aspects, diagnostic and indications].

Authors:  H Nüllen; T Noppeney
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Iliocaval vein stenting: Long term survey of postthrombotic symptoms and working capacity.

Authors:  Alaa Alhadad; Tilo Kölbel; Andreas Herbst; Jan Holst; Hussein Alhadad; Anders Gottsäter
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  The post-thrombotic syndrome: the forgotten morbidity of deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  The state of the art of endothermal ablation.

Authors:  Renate R van den Bos; Thomas M Proebstle
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Neovascularisation is not an innocent bystander in recurrence after great saphenous vein surgery.

Authors:  C R R Corbett; V Prakash
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Role of venous stenting for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Karen Breen
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2020-12-04

7.  A Prospective Study in Comparison of Ambulatory Phlebectomy and Duplex Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in the Management of Varicosities with Isolated Perforator Incompetence.

Authors:  R Kishore; T Bavani Sankar; A Anandi; S Nedunchezhian; Valarmathy Murugan
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Venous claudication in iliofemoral thrombosis: long-term effects on venous hemodynamics, clinical status, and quality of life.

Authors:  Konstantinos T Delis; Dimitris Bountouroglou; Averil O Mansfield
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Endovascular laser therapy for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-04-01

10.  Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2011-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.