Literature DB >> 10132081

Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins.

A M Garratt1, L M Macdonald, D A Ruta, I T Russell, J K Buckingham, Z H Krukowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a valid and reliable outcome measure for patients with varicose veins.
DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey of patients with varicose veins.
SETTING: Surgical outpatient departments and training general practices in Grampian region.
SUBJECTS: 373 patients, 287 of whom had just been referred to hospital for their varicose veins and 86 who had just consulted a general practitioner for this condition and, for comparison, a random sample of 900 members of the general population. MAIN MEASURES: Content validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity.
RESULTS: 281(76%) patients (mean age 45.8; 76% female) and 542(60%) of the general population (mean age 47.9; 54% female) responded. The questionnaire had good internal consistency as measured by item-total correlations. Factor analysis identified four important health factors: pain and dysfunction, cosmetic appearance, extent of varicosity and complications. The validity of the questionnaire was demonstrated by a high correlation with the SF-36 health profile, which is a general measure of patients' health. The perceived health of patients with varicose veins, as measured by the SF-36, was significantly lower than that of the sample of the general population adjusted for age and a lower proportion of women.
CONCLUSION: A clinically derived questionnaire can provide a valid and reliable tool to assess the perceived health of patients with varicose veins. IMPLICATIONS: The questionnaire may be used to justify surgical treatment of varicose veins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10132081      PMCID: PMC1055054          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2.1.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  13 in total

1.  Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.

Authors:  J Dixon; H G Welch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; W Rogers; A E Raczek; J F Lu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The value of different forms of treatment for varicose veins.

Authors:  B H Jakobsen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Surgery and sclerotherapy in the treatment of varicose veins. A random trial.

Authors:  J T Hobbs
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1974-12

6.  Treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  R A Nabatoff; D C Stark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Varicose veins: a comparison of surgery and injection-compression sclerotherapy.

Authors:  A D Chant; H O Jones; J M Weddell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-12-02       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The economics of treating varicose veins.

Authors:  D Piachaud; J M Weddell
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  The effect of hypotensive drugs on the quality of life.

Authors:  S J Jachuck; H Brierley; S Jachuck; P M Willcox
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1982-02

10.  Varicose veins: A comparison of surgery and infection/compression sclerotherapy. Five-year follow-up.

Authors:  S A Beresford; A D Chant; H O Jones; D Piachaud; J M Weddell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  38 in total

1.  The SF-36 as a health status measure for epilepsy: a psychometric assessment.

Authors:  A Jacoby; G A Baker; N Steen; D Buck
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Role of users of health care in achieving a quality service.

Authors:  A Hopkins; J Gabbay; J Neuberger
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-12

3.  Socio-economic impact of endovenous thermal ablation techniques.

Authors:  Damian Kelleher; Tristan R A Lane; Ian J Franklin; Alun H Davies
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcome measures in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Wael El-Matary
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11

5.  Neovascularisation is not an innocent bystander in recurrence after great saphenous vein surgery.

Authors:  C R R Corbett; V Prakash
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Mapping clinical outcomes to generic preference-based outcome measures: development and comparison of methods.

Authors:  Mónica Hernández Alava; Allan Wailoo; Stephen Pudney; Laura Gray; Andrea Manca
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions.

Authors:  A M Garratt; D A Ruta; M I Abdalla; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-12

8.  Positive Outcomes of Varicose Vein Surgery: The Patient Perspective.

Authors:  Wei-Han Cheng; Haridarshan Patel; Wan-Ju Lee; Fang-Ju Lin; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Assessment of patients with menorrhagia: how valid is a structured clinical history as a measure of health status?

Authors:  D A Ruta; A M Garratt; Y C Chadha; G M Flett; M H Hall; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Efficacy of topical local anaesthesia to reduce perioperative pain for endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sunita Saha; Alok Tiwari; Charlotte Hunns; Jonathan Refson; Ahmed Abidia
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-04-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.