Andreas Charidimou1, Sergi Martinez-Ramirez2, Ashkan Shoamanesh2, Jamary Oliveira-Filho2, Matthew Frosch2, Anastasia Vashkevich2, Alison Ayres2, Jonathan Rosand2, Mahmut Edip Gurol2, Steven M Greenberg2, Anand Viswanathan2. 1. From the Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (A.C.), UCL Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; and the Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology (A.C., S.M.-R., A.S., J.O.-F., A. Vashkevich, A.A., J.R., M.E.G., S.M.G., A. Viswanathan), C.S. Kubik Laboratory for Neuropathology (M.F.), Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology (J.R.), and Center for Human Genetic Research (J.R.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. acharidimou@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. From the Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (A.C.), UCL Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; and the Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Program, Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology (A.C., S.M.-R., A.S., J.O.-F., A. Vashkevich, A.A., J.R., M.E.G., S.M.G., A. Viswanathan), C.S. Kubik Laboratory for Neuropathology (M.F.), Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology (J.R.), and Center for Human Genetic Research (J.R.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into different cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) phenotypes and mechanisms, we investigated cortical superficial siderosis (CSS), a new imaging marker of the disease, and its relation with APOE genotype in patients with pathologically proven CAA, who presented with and without intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: MRI scans of 105 patients with CAA pathologic confirmation and MRI were analyzed for CSS (focal, ≤3 sulci; disseminates, ≥4 sulci) and other imaging markers. We compared pathologic, imaging, and APOE genotype data between subjects with vs without ICH, and investigated associations between CSS and APOE genotype. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 54 patients with CAA with symptomatic lobar ICH and 51 without ICH. APOE genotype was available in 53 patients. More than 90% of pathology samples in both groups had neuritic plaques, whereas neurofibrillary tangles were more commonly present in the patients without ICH (87% vs 42%, p < 0.0001). There was a trend for patients with CAA with ICH to more commonly have APOE ε2 (48.7% vs 21.4%, p = 0.075), whereas patients without ICH were more likely to be APOE ε4 carriers (85.7% vs 53.9%, p = 0.035). Disseminated CSS was considerably commoner in patients with ICH (33.3% vs 5.9%, p < 0.0001). In logistic regression, disseminated CSS was associated with APOE ε2 (but not APOE ε4) (odds ratio 5.83; 95% confidence interval 1.49-22.82, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: This neuropathologically defined CAA cohort suggests that CSS and APOE ε2 are related to the hemorrhagic expression of the disease; APOE ε4 is enriched in nonhemorrhagic CAA. Our study emphasizes the concept of different CAA phenotypes, suggesting divergent pathophysiologic mechanisms.
OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into different cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) phenotypes and mechanisms, we investigated cortical superficial siderosis (CSS), a new imaging marker of the disease, and its relation with APOE genotype in patients with pathologically proven CAA, who presented with and without intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: MRI scans of 105 patients with CAA pathologic confirmation and MRI were analyzed for CSS (focal, ≤3 sulci; disseminates, ≥4 sulci) and other imaging markers. We compared pathologic, imaging, and APOE genotype data between subjects with vs without ICH, and investigated associations between CSS and APOE genotype. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 54 patients with CAA with symptomatic lobar ICH and 51 without ICH. APOE genotype was available in 53 patients. More than 90% of pathology samples in both groups had neuritic plaques, whereas neurofibrillary tangles were more commonly present in the patients without ICH (87% vs 42%, p < 0.0001). There was a trend for patients with CAA with ICH to more commonly have APOE ε2 (48.7% vs 21.4%, p = 0.075), whereas patients without ICH were more likely to be APOE ε4 carriers (85.7% vs 53.9%, p = 0.035). Disseminated CSS was considerably commoner in patients with ICH (33.3% vs 5.9%, p < 0.0001). In logistic regression, disseminated CSS was associated with APOE ε2 (but not APOE ε4) (odds ratio 5.83; 95% confidence interval 1.49-22.82, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: This neuropathologically defined CAA cohort suggests that CSS and APOE ε2 are related to the hemorrhagic expression of the disease; APOE ε4 is enriched in nonhemorrhagic CAA. Our study emphasizes the concept of different CAA phenotypes, suggesting divergent pathophysiologic mechanisms.
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J Linn; J Herms; M Dichgans; H Brückmann; G Fesl; T Freilinger; M Wiesmann Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-10-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Steven M Greenberg; Meike W Vernooij; Charlotte Cordonnier; Anand Viswanathan; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Steven Warach; Lenore J Launer; Mark A Van Buchem; Monique Mb Breteler Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Andreas Charidimou; Jun Ni; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Anastasia Vashkevich; Alison Ayres; Jonathan Rosand; Edip M Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Anand Viswanathan Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Jonathan Graff-Radford; Timothy G Lesnick; Michelle M Mielke; Eleni Constantopoulos; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Scott A Przybelski; Prashanthi Vemuri; Hugo Botha; David T Jones; Vijay K Ramanan; Ronald C Petersen; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Melissa E Murray; Dennis W Dickson; Clifford R Jack; Kejal Kantarci; R Ross Reichard Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Hyemin Jang; Young Kyoung Jang; Hee Jin Kim; David John Werring; Jin San Lee; Yeong Sim Choe; Seongbeom Park; Juyeon Lee; Ko Woon Kim; Yeshin Kim; Soo Hyun Cho; Si Eun Kim; Seung Joo Kim; Andreas Charidimou; Duk L Na; Sang Won Seo Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andreas Charidimou; Gregoire Boulouis; M Edip Gurol; Cenk Ayata; Brian J Bacskai; Matthew P Frosch; Anand Viswanathan; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Brain Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Gregoire Boulouis; Andreas Charidimou; Michael J Jessel; Li Xiong; Duangnapa Roongpiboonsopit; Panagiotis Fotiadis; Marco Pasi; Alison Ayres; M Emily Merrill; Kristin M Schwab; Jonathan Rosand; M Edip Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Anand Viswanathan Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Thanakit Pongpitakmetha; Panagiotis Fotiadis; Marco Pasi; Gregoire Boulouis; Li Xiong; Andrew D Warren; Kristin M Schwab; Jonathan Rosand; M Edip Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Anand Viswanathan; Andreas Charidimou Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Andreas Charidimou; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Yael D Reijmer; Jamary Oliveira-Filho; Arne Lauer; Duangnapa Roongpiboonsopit; Matthew Frosch; Anastasia Vashkevich; Alison Ayres; Jonathan Rosand; Mahmut Edip Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Anand Viswanathan Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 18.302