Literature DB >> 25716211

Are There Sex Differences in Knee Cartilage Composition and Walking Mechanics in Healthy and Osteoarthritis Populations?

Deepak Kumar1, Richard B Souza, Karupppasamy Subburaj, Toran D MacLeod, Justin Singh, Nathaniel E Calixto, Lorenzo Nardo, Thomas M Link, Xiaojuan Li, Nancy E Lane, Sharmila Majumdar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women are at a greater risk for knee osteoarthritis (OA), but reasons for this greater risk in women are not well understood. It may be possible that differences in cartilage composition and walking mechanics are related to greater OA risk in women. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do women have higher knee cartilage and meniscus T1ρ than men in young healthy, middle-aged non-OA and OA populations? (2) Do women exhibit greater static and dynamic (during walking) knee loading than men in young healthy, middle-aged non-OA and OA populations?
METHODS: Data were collected from three cohorts: (1) young active (<35 years) (20 men, 13 women); (2) middle-aged (≥35 years) without OA (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade < 2) (43 men, 65 women); and (3) middle-aged with OA (KL>1) (18 men, 25 women). T1ρ and T2 relaxation times for cartilage in the medial knee, lateral knee, and patellofemoral compartments and medial and lateral menisci were quantified with 3.0-T MRI. A subset of the participants underwent three-dimensional motion capture during walking for calculation of peak knee flexion and adduction moments, flexion and adduction impulses, and peak adduction angle. Differences in MR, radiograph, and gait parameters between men and women were compared in the three groups separately using multivariate analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Women had higher lateral articular cartilage T1ρ (men=40.5 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 38.8-42.3] ms; women=43.3 [95% CI, 41.9-44.7] ms; p=0.017) and patellofemoral T1ρ (men=44.4 [95% CI, 42.6-46.3] ms; women=48.4 [95% CI, 46.9-50.0] ms; p=0.002) in the OA group; and higher lateral meniscus T1ρ in the young group (men=15.3 [95% CI, 14.7-16.0] ms; women=16.4 [95% CI, 15.6-17.2] ms; p=0.045). The peak adduction moment in the second half of stance was lower in women in the middle-aged (men=2.05 [95% CI, 1.76-2.34] %BW*Ht; women=1.66 [95% CI, 1.44-1.89] %BW*Ht; p=0.037) and OA (men=2.34 [95% CI, 1.76-2.91] %BW*Ht; women=1.42 [95% CI, 0.89-1.94] %BW*Ht; p=0.022) groups. Static varus from radiographs was lower in women in the middle-aged (men=178° [95% CI, 177°-179°]; women=180° [95% CI, 179°-181°]; p=0.002) and OA (men=176° [95% CI, 175°-178°]; women=180° [95% CI, 179°-181°]; p<0.001) groups. Women had lower varus during walking in all three groups (young: men=4° [95% CI, 3°-6°]; women=2° [95% CI, 0°-3°]; p=0.013; middle-aged: men=2° [95% CI, 1°-3°]; women=0° [95% CI, -1° to 1°]; p=0.015; OA: men=4° [95% CI, 2°-6°]; women=0° [95% CI, -2° to 2°]; p=0.011). Women had a higher knee flexion moment (men=4.24 [95% CI, 3.58-4.91] %BW*Ht; women 5.40 [95% CI, 4.58-6.21] %BW*Ht; p=0.032) in the young group.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate differences in cartilage composition and gait mechanics between men and women in young healthy, middle-aged healthy, and OA cohorts. Considering the cross-sectional nature of the study, longitudinal research is needed to investigate if these differences in cartilage composition and walking mechanics are associated with a greater risk of lateral tibiofemoral or patellofemoral OA in women. Future studies should also investigate the relative risk of lateral versus medial patellofemoral cartilage degeneration risk in women compared with men. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25716211      PMCID: PMC4488198          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4212-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  55 in total

1.  Gender differences in knee joint cartilage thickness, volume and articular surface areas: assessment with quantitative three-dimensional MR imaging.

Authors:  S C Faber; F Eckstein; S Lukasz; R Mühlbauer; J Hohe; K H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  T Miyazaki; M Wada; H Kawahara; M Sato; H Baba; S Shimada
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee.

Authors:  R W Hsu; S Himeno; M B Coventry; E Y Chao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Articular cartilage and osteoarthrosis. The role of molecular markers to monitor breakdown, repair and disease.

Authors:  L S Lohmander
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  T1rho MRI of menisci and cartilage in patients with osteoarthritis at 3T.

Authors:  Ligong Wang; Gregory Chang; Jian Xu; Renata L R Vieira; Svetlana Krasnokutsky; Steven Abramson; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  T2 and T1rho MRI in articular cartilage systems.

Authors:  Nina M Menezes; Martha L Gray; James R Hartke; Deborah Burstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Correlation and sex differences between ankle and knee cartilage morphology determined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Eckstein; V Siedek; C Glaser; D Al-Ali; K-H Englmeier; M Reiser; H Graichen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study.

Authors:  A A Guccione; D T Felson; J J Anderson; J M Anthony; Y Zhang; P W Wilson; M Kelly-Hayes; P A Wolf; B E Kreger; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Effect of gender on in vivo cartilage magnetic resonance imaging T2 mapping.

Authors:  Timothy J Mosher; Christopher M Collins; Harvey E Smith; Lauren E Moser; Rebecca T Sivarajah; Bernard J Dardzinski; Michael B Smith
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Sex differences in knee cartilage volume in adults: role of body and bone size, age and physical activity.

Authors:  C Ding; F Cicuttini; F Scott; M Glisson; G Jones
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  11 in total

1.  Associations of three-dimensional T1 rho MR mapping and three-dimensional T2 mapping with macroscopic and histologic grading as a biomarker for early articular degeneration of knee cartilage.

Authors:  T Sasho; J Katsuragi; S Yamaguchi; H Haneishi; T Aizimu; T Tanaka; A Watanabe; Y Sato; R Akagi; K Matsumoto; T Uno; K Motoori
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Sexual dimorphism in knee osteoarthritis: Biomechanical variances and biological influences.

Authors:  Alicia L Black; Andrea L Clark
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-28

3.  Baseline Cartilage Thickness and Meniscus Extrusion Predict Longitudinal Cartilage Loss by Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Jason S Klein; Jean Jose; Michael G Baraga; Ty K Subhawong
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 4.  T1ρ magnetic resonance: basic physics principles and applications in knee and intervertebral disc imaging.

Authors:  Yì-Xiáng J Wáng; Qinwei Zhang; Xiaojuan Li; Weitian Chen; Anil Ahuja; Jing Yuan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-12

5.  Influence of sex and gender on the management of late-stage knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  B Moretti; A Spinarelli; G Varrassi; L Massari; A Gigante; G Iolascon; M G Benedetti; A M Moretti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2021-08-07

6.  Characterizing the transient response of knee cartilage to running: Decreases in cartilage T2 of female recreational runners.

Authors:  Hollis A Crowder; Valentina Mazzoli; Marianne S Black; Lauren E Watkins; Feliks Kogan; Brian A Hargreaves; Marc E Levenston; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  T1ρ/T2 mapping and histopathology of degenerative cartilage in advanced knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Benjamin S Kester; Philip M Carpenter; Hon J Yu; Taiki Nozaki; Yasuhito Kaneko; Hiroshi Yoshioka; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-04-18

Review 8.  Stem Cells for Cartilage Repair: Preclinical Studies and Insights in Translational Animal Models and Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Melissa Lo Monaco; Greet Merckx; Jessica Ratajczak; Pascal Gervois; Petra Hilkens; Peter Clegg; Annelies Bronckaers; Jean-Michel Vandeweerd; Ivo Lambrichts
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 9.  Gender-Related Aspects in Osteoarthritis Development and Progression: A Review.

Authors:  Maria Peshkova; Alexey Lychagin; Marina Lipina; Berardo Di Matteo; Giuseppe Anzillotti; Flavio Ronzoni; Nastasia Kosheleva; Anastasia Shpichka; Valeriy Royuk; Victor Fomin; Eugene Kalinsky; Peter Timashev; Elizaveta Kon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Gender-specific differential expression of exosomal miRNA in synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ravindra Kolhe; Monte Hunter; Siyang Liu; Ravirajsinh N Jadeja; Chetan Pundkar; Ashis K Mondal; Bharati Mendhe; Michelle Drewry; Mumtaz V Rojiani; Yutao Liu; Carlos M Isales; Robert E Guldberg; Mark W Hamrick; Sadanand Fulzele
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.