Literature DB >> 12810930

Sex differences in knee cartilage volume in adults: role of body and bone size, age and physical activity.

C Ding1, F Cicuttini, F Scott, M Glisson, G Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that sex differences in knee cartilage volume may be mediated through body and bone size, age and/or physical activity.
METHODS: A cross-sectional convenience sample of 372 subjects (males 43%; mean age 45 yr, range 26-61) was studied. Articular cartilage volumes and bone size were determined at the patella, medial and lateral tibia by processing images acquired in the sagittal plane using T1-weighted fat saturation magnetic resonance imaging. Height, weight, physical activity (lower limb muscle strength, endurance fitness and questionnaire items) and radiographic osteoarthritis (ROA) were measured.
RESULTS: Gender explained 33-42% of the variation in knee cartilage volumes (all P < 0.001). Males had 33-42% higher cartilage volume than females at all sites. In the whole group, the magnitude of sex differences decreased to 8-18% after adjustment for body height, weight and bone size, but remained significant (all P < 0.05). Further adjustment for physical activity had no effect on the sex differences. The sex differences in cartilage volume were greater in those aged over 50 compared with those aged under 50 (P < 0.05 for age-sex interaction at all sites) and were independent of ROA.
CONCLUSIONS: Men have substantially higher knee cartilage volumes than women. These sex differences appear to be mediated in part by body and bone size but a significant amount remains unexplained. Furthermore, the differences become more marked over the age of 50 yr suggesting that both cartilage development and cartilage loss in later life contribute to sex differences in cartilage volume. Further longitudinal studies in large samples will be required to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12810930     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  30 in total

1.  Anthropometric difference of the knee on MRI according to gender and age groups.

Authors:  Hyuksoo Han; Sohee Oh; Chong Bum Chang; Seung-Baik Kang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Anita E Wluka; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

3.  A new technique to evaluate the impact of running on knee cartilage deformation by region.

Authors:  Elora C Brenneman Wilson; Anthony A Gatti; Monica R Maly
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Variation in the Thickness of Knee Cartilage. The Use of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Cartilage Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Romil F Shah; Alejandro M Martinez; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas P Vail; Stefano A Bini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Mean femoral cartilage thickness is higher in athletes as compared with sedentary individuals.

Authors:  Naila Babayeva; Gürhan Dönmez; Levent Özçakar; Şerife Şeyma Torgutalp; Levend Karaçoban; Emre Gedik; Feza Korkusuz; Mahmut Nedim Doral
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The effect of aerobic walking and lower body resistance exercise on serum COMP and hyaluronan, in both males and females.

Authors:  Harry M Roberts; Jonathan P Moore; Jeanette M Thom
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Do we need gender-specific total joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Christopher R Costa; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Sagittal-Plane Knee Moment During Gait and Knee Cartilage Thickness.

Authors:  Randy J Schmitz; David Harrison; Hsin-Min Wang; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Gender Differences in Knee Joint Congruity Quantified from MRI: A Validation Study with Data from Center for Clinical and Basic Research and Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Sudhakar Tummala; Dieuwke Schiphof; Inger Byrjalsen; Erik B Dam
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Cartilage signal intensity on T1-weighted MRI: association with risk factors and measures of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Oliver Patrick Stannus; Danchi Jiang; Flavia Cicuttini; Yuelong Cao; Changhai Ding
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.