OBJECTIVE: To compare the cartilage thickness, volume, and articular surface areas of the knee joint between young healthy, non-athletic female and male individuals. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: MR imaging was performed in 18 healthy subjects without local or systemic joint disease (9 female, age 22.3 +/- 2.4 years, and 9 male, age 22.2 +/- 1.9 years.), using a fat-suppressed FLASH 3D pulse sequence (TR = 41 ms, TE = 11 ms, FA = 30 degrees) with sagittal orientation and a spatial resolution of 2 x 0.31 x 0.31 mm3. After three-dimensional reconstruction and triangulation of the knee joint cartilage plates, the cartilage thickness (mean and maximal), volume, and size of the articular surface area were quantified, independent of the original section orientation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Women displayed smaller cartilage volumes than men, the percentage difference ranging from 19.9% in the patella, to 46.6% in the medial tibia. The gender differences of the cartilage thickness were smaller, ranging from 2.0% in the femoral trochlea to 13.3% in the medial tibia for the mean thickness, and from 4.3% in the medial femoral condyle to 18.3% in the medial tibia for the maximal cartilage thickness. The differences between the cartilage surface areas were similar to those of the volumes, with values ranging from 21.0% in the femur to 33.4% in the lateral tibia. Gender differences could be reduced for cartilage volume and surface area when normalized to body weight and body weight x body height. The study demonstrates significant gender differences in cartilage volume and surface area of men and women, which need to be taken into account when retrospectively estimating articular cartilage loss in patients with symptoms of degenerative joint disease. Differences in cartilage volume are primarily due to differences in joint surface areas (epiphyseal bone size), not to differences in cartilage thickness.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the cartilage thickness, volume, and articular surface areas of the knee joint between young healthy, non-athletic female and male individuals. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: MR imaging was performed in 18 healthy subjects without local or systemic joint disease (9 female, age 22.3 +/- 2.4 years, and 9 male, age 22.2 +/- 1.9 years.), using a fat-suppressed FLASH 3D pulse sequence (TR = 41 ms, TE = 11 ms, FA = 30 degrees) with sagittal orientation and a spatial resolution of 2 x 0.31 x 0.31 mm3. After three-dimensional reconstruction and triangulation of the knee joint cartilage plates, the cartilage thickness (mean and maximal), volume, and size of the articular surface area were quantified, independent of the original section orientation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS:Women displayed smaller cartilage volumes than men, the percentage difference ranging from 19.9% in the patella, to 46.6% in the medial tibia. The gender differences of the cartilage thickness were smaller, ranging from 2.0% in the femoral trochlea to 13.3% in the medial tibia for the mean thickness, and from 4.3% in the medial femoral condyle to 18.3% in the medial tibia for the maximal cartilage thickness. The differences between the cartilage surface areas were similar to those of the volumes, with values ranging from 21.0% in the femur to 33.4% in the lateral tibia. Gender differences could be reduced for cartilage volume and surface area when normalized to body weight and body weight x body height. The study demonstrates significant gender differences in cartilage volume and surface area of men and women, which need to be taken into account when retrospectively estimating articular cartilage loss in patients with symptoms of degenerative joint disease. Differences in cartilage volume are primarily due to differences in joint surface areas (epiphyseal bone size), not to differences in cartilage thickness.
Authors: Elena Ruiz Mediavilla; Bernardo Perea Pérez; Elena Labajo González; José Antonio Sánchez Sánchez; Andrés Santiago Sáez; Enrique Dorado Fernández Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Romil F Shah; Alejandro M Martinez; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas P Vail; Stefano A Bini Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Robert Stahl; Anthony Luke; Xiaojuan Li; Julio Carballido-Gamio; C Benjamin Ma; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 5.315