Literature DB >> 25716088

Norway rats reciprocate help according to the quality of help they received.

Vassilissa Dolivo1, Michael Taborsky2.   

Abstract

Direct reciprocity, according to the decision rule 'help someone who has helped you before', reflects cooperation based on the principle of postponed benefits. A predominant factor influencing Homo sapiens' motivation to reciprocate is an individual's perceived benefit resulting from the value of received help. But hitherto it has been unclear whether other species also base their decision to cooperate on the quality of received help. Previous experiments have demonstrated that Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus, cooperate using direct reciprocity decision rules in a variant of the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, where they preferentially help cooperators instead of defectors. But, as the quality of obtained benefits has not been varied, it is yet unclear whether rats use the value of received help as decision criterion to pay help back. Here, we tested whether rats distinguish between different cooperators depending purely on the quality of their help. Our data show that a rat's propensity to reciprocate help is, indeed, adjusted to the perceived quality of the partner's previous help. When cooperating with two conspecific partners expending the same effort, rats apparently rely on obtained benefit to adjust their level of returned help.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rattus norvegicus; altruism; cooperation; direct reciprocity; food exchange task; helping

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25716088      PMCID: PMC4360107          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  7 in total

1.  Contingent cooperation between wild female baboons.

Authors:  Dorothy L Cheney; Liza R Moscovice; Marlies Heesen; Roger Mundry; Robert M Seyfarth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeys.

Authors:  Cécile Fruteau; Bernhard Voelkl; Eric van Damme; Ronald Noë
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Kinship reduces alloparental care in cooperative cichlids where helpers pay-to-stay.

Authors:  Markus Zöttl; Dik Heg; Noémie Chervet; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Reciprocal cooperation between unrelated rats depends on cost to donor and benefit to recipient.

Authors:  Karin Schneeberger; Melanie Dietz; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Food sharing in vampire bats: reciprocal help predicts donations more than relatedness or harassment.

Authors:  Gerald G Carter; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Self-centered social exchange: differential use of costs versus benefits in prosocial reciprocity.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Nicholas Epley
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-11

7.  Generalized reciprocity in rats.

Authors:  Claudia Rutte; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 8.029

  7 in total
  21 in total

1.  Social benefits of non-kin food sharing by female vampire bats.

Authors:  Gerald G Carter; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Reciprocal altruism in rats: Why does it occur?

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.

Authors:  Michael Taborsky; Joachim G Frommen; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Relatedness decreases and reciprocity increases cooperation in Norway rats.

Authors:  Manon K Schweinfurth; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Non-kin cooperation in bats.

Authors:  Gerald S Wilkinson; Gerald G Carter; Kirsten M Bohn; Danielle M Adams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The smell of cooperation: rats increase helpful behaviour when receiving odour cues of a conspecific performing a cooperative task.

Authors:  Nina Gerber; Manon K Schweinfurth; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Male rats play a repeated donation game.

Authors:  Grace Li; Ruth I Wood
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-03-14

8.  Ultimate and proximate mechanisms of reciprocal altruism in rats.

Authors:  Vassilissa Dolivo; Claudia Rutte; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Egg-trading worms start reciprocation with caution, respond with confidence and care about partners' quality.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Lorenzi; Dáša Schleicherová; Franco G Robles-Guerrero; Michela Dumas; Alice Araguas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Pain expressiveness and altruistic behavior: an exploration using agent-based modeling.

Authors:  Amanda C de C Williams; Elizabeth Gallagher; Antonio R Fidalgo; Peter J Bentley
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.