Literature DB >> 19581578

Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeys.

Cécile Fruteau1, Bernhard Voelkl, Eric van Damme, Ronald Noë.   

Abstract

Animals neither negotiate verbally nor conclude binding contracts, but nevertheless regularly exchange goods and services without overt coercion and manage to arrive at agreements over exchange rates. Biological market theory predicts that such exchange rates fluctuate according to the law of supply and demand. Previous studies showed that primates pay more when commodities become scarcer: subordinates groomed dominants longer before being tolerated at food sites in periods of shortage; females groomed mothers longer before obtaining permission to handle their infants when there were fewer newborns and males groomed fertile females longer before obtaining their compliance when fewer such females were present. We further substantiated these results by conducting a 2-step experiment in 2 groups of free-ranging vervet monkeys in the Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, South Africa. We first allowed a single low-ranking female to repeatedly provide food to her entire group by triggering the opening of a container and measured grooming bouts involving this female in the hour after she made the reward available. We then measured the shifts in grooming patterns after we added a second food container that could be opened by another low-ranking female, the second provider. All 4 providers received more grooming, relative to the amount of grooming they provided themselves. As biological market theory predicts, the initial gain of first providers was partially lost again after the introduction of a second provider in both groups. We conclude that grooming was fine-tuned to changes in the value of these females as social partners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19581578      PMCID: PMC2706267          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812280106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Primate cognition: from 'what now?' to 'what if?'.

Authors:  Louise Barrett; Peter Henzi; Robin Dunbar
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  The influence of social hierarchy on primate health.

Authors:  Robert M Sapolsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reciprocation and interchange in wild Japanese macaques: grooming, cofeeding, and agonistic support.

Authors:  Raffaella Ventura; Bonaventura Majolo; Nicola F Koyama; Scott Hardie; Gabriele Schino
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Patience.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens; David W Stephens
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms.

Authors:  R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Biological markets.

Authors:  R Noë; P Hammerstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.

Authors:  J Altmann
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.991

8.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  The tragedy of the commons in evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Daniel J Rankin; Katja Bargum; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans.

Authors:  Thomas Baumgartner; Markus Heinrichs; Aline Vonlanthen; Urs Fischbacher; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Cooperation for direct fitness benefits.

Authors:  Olof Leimar; Peter Hammerstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Contingent cooperation between wild female baboons.

Authors:  Dorothy L Cheney; Liza R Moscovice; Marlies Heesen; Roger Mundry; Robert M Seyfarth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Social benefits of non-kin food sharing by female vampire bats.

Authors:  Gerald G Carter; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.

Authors:  Michael Taborsky; Joachim G Frommen; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Rudimentary empathy in macaques' social decision-making.

Authors:  Sebastien Ballesta; Jean-René Duhamel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Female chacma baboons form strong, equitable, and enduring social bonds.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Jacinta C Beehner; Thore J Bergman; Catherine Crockford; Anne L Engh; Liza R Moscovice; Roman M Wittig; Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Extent and limits of cooperation in animals.

Authors:  Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  How placebo responses are formed: a learning perspective.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Social bet-hedging in vampire bats.

Authors:  Gerald G Carter; Damien R Farine; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 10.  How does cognition shape social relationships?

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Ipek G Kulahci; Ellis J G Langley; Rachael C Shaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.