| Literature DB >> 27495930 |
Vassilissa Dolivo1, Claudia Rutte2, Michael Taborsky3.
Abstract
The reciprocal exchange of goods and services among social partners is a conundrum in evolutionary biology because of its proneness to cheating, but also the behavioral and cognitive mechanisms involved in such mutual cooperation are hotly debated. Extreme viewpoints range from the assumption that, at the proximate level, observed cases of "direct reciprocity" can be merely explained by basic instrumental and Pavlovian association processes, to the other extreme implying that "cultural factors" must be involved, as is often attributed to reciprocal cooperation among humans. Here we argue that neither one nor the other extreme conception is likely to explain proximate mechanisms underlying reciprocal altruism in animals. In particular, we outline that Pavlovian association processes are not sufficient to explain the documented reciprocal cooperation among Norway rats, as has been recently argued.Entities:
Keywords: Cognition; Cooperation; Direct reciprocity; Pavlovian conditioning; Rattus norvegicus
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27495930 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-016-0236-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Learn Behav ISSN: 1543-4494 Impact factor: 1.986