Literature DB >> 25714238

Defining 'progression' and triggers for curative intervention during active surveillance.

Laurence Klotz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Low-risk and many cases of low-intermediate risk prostate cancer have little or no metastatic potential, and do not pose a threat to the patient in his lifetime. Substantial recent evidence, reviewed in this article, has clarified who these patients are and supports the use of conservative management in such individuals. RECENT
FINDINGS: A key element of conservative management is the early identification of those 'low-risk' patients who harbour higher risk disease and benefit from definitive therapy. This represents about 30% of newly diagnosed low-risk patients. A further small proportion of patients with low-risk disease demonstrates true biological progression over time to higher grade disease (as distinct from grade increase on repeat biopsy due to resampling). Men with lower risk disease can defer treatment, in most cases for life. The results of active surveillance, embodying conservative management with selective delayed intervention for the subset who are reclassified as higher risk over time based on repeat biopsy, imaging or biomarker results, are associated with a 5% cancer-specific mortality at 15 years.
SUMMARY: Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer is well tolerated in the intermediate-long term time frame. Further refinement of the surveillance approach is ongoing, incorporating MRI, targeted biopsies and molecular biomarkers to improve appropriate patient selection and triggers for intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25714238     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  5 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Sociodemographic and Clinical Predictors of Switching to Active Treatment among a Large, Ethnically Diverse Cohort of Men with Low Risk Prostate Cancer on Observational Management.

Authors:  Scott P Kelly; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Richard M Hoffman; David S Aaronson; Tania Lobo; George Luta; Amethyst D Leimpter; Jun Shan; Arnold L Potosky; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Comparison of Pathological Outcomes for Men with Low Risk Prostate Cancer from Diverse Practice Settings: Similar Results from Immediate Prostatectomy or Initial Surveillance with Delayed Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory B Auffenberg; Susan Linsell; Apoorv Dhir; Stacie N Myers; Bradley Rosenberg; David C Miller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Randomized Trial of Partial Gland Ablation with Vascular Targeted Phototherapy versus Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer: Extended Followup and Analyses of Effectiveness.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Abdel-Rahmene Azzouzi; Mark Emberton; Jonathan A Coleman; Emmanuel Coeytaux; Avigdor Scherz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Green tea extract for prevention of prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance.

Authors:  Nagi B Kumar; Shohreh I Dickinson; Michael J Schell; Brandon J Manley; Michael A Poch; Julio Pow-Sang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-12-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.