Literature DB >> 25711735

Application of the European Test of Olfactory Capabilities in patients with olfactory impairment.

P Joussain1, M Bessy1, F Faure2, D Bellil2, B N Landis3, M Hugentobler3, H Tuorila4, S Mustonen4, S I Vento5, F Delphin-Combe2,6, P Krolak-Salmon1,2,6, C Rouby7, M Bensafi8.   

Abstract

A central issue in olfaction concerns the characterization of loss of olfactory function: partial (hyposmia) or total (anosmia). This paper reports the application in a clinical setting of the European Test of Olfactory Capabilities (ETOC), combining odor detection and identification. The study included three phases. In phase 1, anosmics, hyposmics and controls were tested with the 16-items version of the ETOC. In phase 2, a short version of the ETOC was developed: patients with and controls without olfactory impairment were tested on a 6-items ETOC. In phase 3, to predict olfactory impairments in new individuals, the 16-items ETOC was administered on samples of young and older adults, and the 6-items version was applied in samples of young, elderly participants and Alzheimer patients. In phase 1, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of ETOC scores classified patients and controls with 87.5 % accuracy. In phase 2, LDA provided 84 % correct classification. Results of phase 3 revealed: (1) 16-items ETOC: whereas in young adults, 10 % were classified as hyposmic and 90 % as normosmic, in elderly, 1 % were classified as anosmic, 39 % hyposmic and 60 % normosmic; (2) 6-items ETOC: 15 % of the young adults were classified as having olfactory impairment, compared to 28 % in the older group and 83 % in Alzheimer patients. In conclusion, the ETOC enables characterizing the prevalence of olfactory impairment in young subjects and in normal and pathological aging. Whereas the 16-items ETOC is more discriminant, the short ETOC may provide a fast (5-10 min) tool to assess olfaction in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer; Anosmia; ENT; Hyposmia; Olfaction; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25711735     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3536-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  37 in total

1.  Utility of a three-item smell identification test in detecting olfactory dysfunction.

Authors:  Alexis H Jackman; Richard L Doty
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  The Scandinavian Odor-Identification Test: development, reliability, validity and normative data.

Authors:  S Nordin; A Brämerson; E Lidén; M Bende
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Clinical validation of a new olfactory test.

Authors:  B Kremer; L Klimek; R Mösges
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center.

Authors:  W S Cain; J F Gent; R B Goodspeed; G Leonard
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Olfactory dysfunction.

Authors:  A P Hendriks
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults.

Authors:  Claire Murphy; Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia.

Authors:  J L Cummings; M Mega; K Gray; S Rosenberg-Thompson; D A Carusi; J Gornbein
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Odor identification as an early marker for Alzheimer's disease: impact of lexical functioning and detection sensitivity.

Authors:  C D Morgan; S Nordin; C Murphy
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.475

9.  Presence of both odor identification and detection deficits in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  R L Doty; P F Reyes; T Gregor
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 10.  Complaints of olfactory disorders: epidemiology, assessment and clinical implications.

Authors:  Steven Nordin; Annika Brämerson
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-02
View more
  6 in total

1.  Changes in smell and taste perception related to COVID-19 infection: a case-control study.

Authors:  Camilla Cattaneo; Ella Pagliarini; Sara Paola Mambrini; Elena Tortorici; Roberto Mené; Camilla Torlasco; Elisa Perger; Gianfranco Parati; Simona Bertoli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Multidimensional representation of odors in the human olfactory cortex.

Authors:  A Fournel; C Ferdenzi; C Sezille; C Rouby; M Bensafi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The olfactory bulb as the entry site for prion-like propagation in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Nolwen L Rey; Daniel W Wesson; Patrik Brundin
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 4.  Psychophysical Testing in Chemosensory Disorders.

Authors:  Miriam Fahmy; Katherine Whitcroft
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2022-09-13

5.  Systematic MRI in persistent post-Covid-19 olfactory dysfunction should be reassessed.

Authors:  Ioana Brudasca; Quentin Lisan; Romain Tournegros; Moustafa Bensafi; Camille Ferdenzi; Arnaud Fournel; Luna Denoix; Stéphane Tringali; Maxime Fieux
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.426

6.  Food Neophobia, Odor and Taste Sensitivity, and Overall Flavor Perception in Food.

Authors:  Sharon Puleo; Ada Braghieri; Corrado Pacelli; Alessandra Bendini; Tullia Gallina Toschi; Luisa Torri; Maria Piochi; Rossella Di Monaco
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.