Literature DB >> 9783132

Clinical validation of a new olfactory test.

B Kremer1, L Klimek, R Mösges.   

Abstract

A new approach to clinical olfactometry is presented using nasal sprays. A special dosage valve was used to standardize an aerosol size to 40 microns. For evaluation a 6 x 6 matrix (substance/olfactory quality) with verbal associative clues was used according to test psychological findings. Validation took place in three steps after determining smell-associated thresholds in preliminary examinations. Recognition of different aromas administered either by spraying into the open mouth from a distance of 5 cm using nasal sprays or sniffing opened bottles was compared in 50 subjectively normosmic subjects. Findings showed that the correspondence between the two procedures was relatively high, with global identification of odorous substances as high as 98.4% in the spray test. The number of substances used was next reduced to those six substances providing the most reproducible results in an investigation with 56 normosmic and 55 hyposmic subjects. Verbal associative clues were also tested. In a last step 50 patients with hyposmia of various origin and 110 normosmic subjects were tested, allowing previous results to be reproduced regardless of the cause of hyposmia. The spray test was shown to be easily performed and was suitable as a screening test, with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 100%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9783132     DOI: 10.1007/s004050050076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  9 in total

1.  Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.

Authors:  Glenis Scadding; Peter Hellings; Isam Alobid; Claus Bachert; Wytske Fokkens; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Philippe Gevaert; Josep Guilemany; Livije Kalogjera; Valerie Lund; Joaquim Mullol; Giovanni Passalacqua; Elina Toskala; Cornelius van Drunen
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 2.  [Examination of the sense of smell].

Authors:  T Hummel; A Hähner; M Witt; B N Landis
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  No acute effects of an exposure to 50 ppm methyl methacrylate on the upper airways.

Authors:  A Muttray; J Gosepath; J Brieger; A Faldum; C Zagar; O Mayer-Popken; D Jung; B Roßbach; W Mann; S Letzel
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  [Olfactory dysfunction due to nasal sinus disease. Causes, consequences, epidemiology, and therapy].

Authors:  T Hummel; K B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Application of the European Test of Olfactory Capabilities in patients with olfactory impairment.

Authors:  P Joussain; M Bessy; F Faure; D Bellil; B N Landis; M Hugentobler; H Tuorila; S Mustonen; S I Vento; F Delphin-Combe; P Krolak-Salmon; C Rouby; M Bensafi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  [Olfactory dysfunction. Epidemiology, pathophsiological classification, diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  G Förster; M Damm; H Gudziol; T Hummel; K-B Hüttenbrink; T Just; A Muttray; H Seeber; A Temmel; A Welge-Lüssen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Quantitative measurement of odor detection thresholds using an air dilution olfactometer, and association with genetic variants in a sample of diverse ancestry.

Authors:  Gillian R Cook; S Krithika; Melissa Edwards; Paula Kavanagh; Esteban J Parra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Longer latency of sensory response to intravenous odor injection predicts olfactory neural disorder.

Authors:  Shu Kikuta; Yu Matsumoto; Akihito Kuboki; Tsuguhisa Nakayama; Daiya Asaka; Nobuyoshi Otori; Hiromi Kojima; Takashi Sakamoto; Kashio Akinori; Kaori Kanaya; Rumi Ueha; Ryoji Kagoya; Hironobu Nishijima; Makiko Toma-Hirano; Yayoi Kikkawa; Kenji Kondo; Koichi Tsunoda; Tempei Miyaji; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Kazunori Kataoka; Kensaku Mori; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Psychophysical Testing in Chemosensory Disorders.

Authors:  Miriam Fahmy; Katherine Whitcroft
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2022-09-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.