Literature DB >> 25711229

Co-Expression of p16, Ki67 and COX-2 Is Associated with Basal Phenotype in High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.

Amanda Arantes Perez1, Débora Balabram1, Rafael Malagoli Rocha2, Átila da Silva Souza1, Helenice Gobbi1.   

Abstract

We assessed the co-expression of cell cycle-related biomarkers in a series of 121 consecutive cases of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), pure or associated with invasive carcinoma, and their associations with the different immunoprofiles of DCIS. Cases were identified from the histopathology files of the Breast Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, from 2003 to 2008. The expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 overexpression, cytokeratin 5, epidermal growth factor receptor 1, cyclooxygenase-2, p16 and Ki67 were assessed. Tumors were placed into five subgroups according to their immunohistochemical profile: luminal A, luminal B, HER2, basal-like and "not classified". We found that the basal phenotype was associated with a higher frequency of p16-positive cases (83%) and the luminal A phenotype showed a higher frequency of p16-negative cases (93%; p=0.000). The association of biomarkers p16(+)/Ki67(+)/COX2(+) was expressed in 02/06 cases (33.3%) of the basal phenotype but in only 01/70 cases (1.4%) of the luminal A phenotype (p=0.01). The co-expression of p16(+)/Ki67(+)/COX2(-) was associated with a basal phenotype (p=0.004). P16 expression, p16(+)/Ki67(+)/COX2(+) and p16(+)/Ki67(+)/COX2(-) co-expression showed significant associations with the basal phenotype and these profiles could be used to guide more aggressive treatment strategies in patients with high-grade DCIS.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological markers; biomarkers; breast cancer; ductal carcinoma in situ

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25711229      PMCID: PMC4872194          DOI: 10.1369/0022155415576540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  32 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ in young women with an emphasis on molecular subtype.

Authors:  Christopher J VandenBussche; Hillary Elwood; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Zeid Bittar; Peter B Illei; Hind Nassar Warzecha
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Biological markers that predict clinical recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  E Provenzano; J L Hopper; G G Giles; G Marr; D J Venter; J E Armes
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Annette M Molinaro; Mona L Gauthier; Hal K Berman; Fred Waldman; James Bennington; Henry Sanchez; Cynthia Jimenez; Kim Stewart; Karen Chew; Britt-Marie Ljung; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Kalliopi P Siziopikou
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  The status of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ lesions and invasive breast cancer correlates to cyclooxygenase-2 expression in normal breast tissue.

Authors:  Cornelia Leo; Stefanie Faber; Bettina Hentschel; Michael Höckel; Lars-Christian Horn
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.090

6.  Identification of a basal-like subtype of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Chad A Livasy; Charles M Perou; Gamze Karaca; David W Cowan; Diane Maia; Susan Jackson; Chiu-Kit Tse; Sarah Nyante; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Torsten O Nielsen; Forrest D Hsu; Kristin Jensen; Maggie Cheang; Gamze Karaca; Zhiyuan Hu; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Chad Livasy; Dave Cowan; Lynn Dressler; Lars A Akslen; Joseph Ragaz; Allen M Gown; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Incidence of breast cancer with distant involvement among women in the United States, 1976 to 2009.

Authors:  Rebecca H Johnson; Franklin L Chien; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Ductal carcinoma in situ--current management.

Authors:  Martin J O'Sullivan; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Biological Markers in DCIS and Risk of Breast Recurrence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sara A Lari; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Acetylation and Dysregulation, Due to Loss of SIRT3 Activity, Promote a Luminal B-Like Breast Carcinogenic-Permissive Phenotype.

Authors:  Xianghui Zou; Cesar Augusto Santa-Maria; Joseph O'Brien; David Gius; Yueming Zhu
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Cancer stem cells and early stage basal-like breast cancer.

Authors:  Pang-Kuo Lo; Benjamin Wolfson; Qun Zhou
Journal:  World J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-10

Review 3.  The intrinsically disorderly story of Ki-67.

Authors:  Lucy Remnant; Natalia Y Kochanova; Caitlin Reid; Fernanda Cisneros-Soberanis; William C Earnshaw
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 6.411

4.  Cytokeratin 5 and cytokeratin 6 expressions are unconnected in normal and cancerous tissues and have separate diagnostic implications.

Authors:  Cosima Völkel; Noémi De Wispelaere; Sören Weidemann; Natalia Gorbokon; Maximilian Lennartz; Andreas M Luebke; Claudia Hube-Magg; Martina Kluth; Christoph Fraune; Katharina Möller; Christian Bernreuther; Patrick Lebok; Till S Clauditz; Frank Jacobsen; Guido Sauter; Ria Uhlig; Waldemar Wilczak; Stefan Steurer; Sarah Minner; Rainer H Krech; David Dum; Till Krech; Andreas H Marx; Ronald Simon; Eike Burandt; Anne Menz
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  High expression of cyclooxygenase 2 is an indicator of prognosis for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Dongxin Hu; Mingyan Zhang; Shuai Wang; Zhou Wang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Transition to invasive breast cancer is associated with progressive changes in the structure and composition of tumor stroma.

Authors:  Tyler Risom; David R Glass; Inna Averbukh; Candace C Liu; Alex Baranski; Adam Kagel; Erin F McCaffrey; Noah F Greenwald; Belén Rivero-Gutiérrez; Siri H Strand; Sushama Varma; Alex Kong; Leeat Keren; Sucheta Srivastava; Chunfang Zhu; Zumana Khair; Deborah J Veis; Katherine Deschryver; Sujay Vennam; Carlo Maley; E Shelley Hwang; Jeffrey R Marks; Sean C Bendall; Graham A Colditz; Robert B West; Michael Angelo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 41.582

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.